an examination of the impact of mixed variable fixed non
play

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 18, 2023 •101 likes •269 views

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1

  1. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University

  2. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Non-Content-Based Content-Based Invalid Responding Invalid Responding F, Fp, Fs, Unscorable Overreporting CNS FBS, RBS Responding Variable L, K VRIN Underreporting Responding Fixed True Fixed False TRIN Responding Responding Ben-Porath (2013)

  3. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Non-Content-Based Content-Based Invalid Responding Invalid Responding F, Fp, Fs, Unscorable Overreporting CNS FBS, RBS Responding Variable L, K VRIN Underreporting Responding Mixed Inconsistent Responding CRIN Fixed True Fixed False TRIN Responding Responding Ben-Porath (2013) Ben-Porath & Tellegen (2020)

  4. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Burchett et al. (2016); Dragon, Ben-Porath, & Handel (2012); Handel, Ben-Porath, Tellegen, & Archer (2010); Lemaster, Whitney, Burchett, & Lee (2019); Whitney et al. (2018a, 2018b)

  5. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Research Questions: 1. How does mixed inconsistent responding affect MMPI-3 Validity Scales? 2. Do VRIN, TRIN, and CRIN reduce the likelihood of misinterpreting overreporting and underreporting Validity Scale elevations caused by mixed inconsistent responding (“false feigning”)?

  6. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University n = 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 166 ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  7. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University n = 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 166 ACR10: ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR A (Acquiescent): 10% of Items #1-112 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 replaced with TRUE responses ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 C (Counter-Acquiescent): 10% of Items # 113-224 replaced with FALSE responses CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% R (Random): 10% of Items # 225-335 CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA replaced with either TRUE or FALSE responses 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  8. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Mean Scores with 0 to 100% Mixed Inconsistent Responding CRIN VRIN TRIN 120T 40T 0% 100%

  9. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100 F ≥ 100 Fs ≥ 100 RBS ≥ 90

  10. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100 F ≥ 100 Fs ≥ 100 RBS ≥ 90

  11. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

  12. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

  13. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

Recommend

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Substantive Scales Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Maddie Cardellio 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2

349 views • 10 slides
19. Fixed costs and variable bounds Fixed cost example Logic and the Big M Method

19. Fixed costs and variable bounds Fixed cost example Logic and the Big M Method

CS/ECE/ISyE 524 Introduction to Optimization Spring 201718 19. Fixed costs and variable bounds Fixed cost example Logic and the Big M Method Example: facility location Variable lower bounds Laurent Lessard

453 views • 26 slides
A Cross-Sectional and Mixed Methods Examination of Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs among

A Cross-Sectional and Mixed Methods Examination of Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs among

A Cross-Sectional and Mixed Methods Examination of Non-medical Use of Prescription Drugs among Adolescents BRIDGID MARIKO CONN, M.A. APRIL 2, 2014 SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY BOSTON, MA Background Prescription drug misuse (NMUPD) is a growing

289 views • 26 slides
MG&E Bill Example Fixed vs. Variable Charges DAY charges

MG&E Bill Example Fixed vs. Variable Charges DAY charges

Madison Gas & Electric Rate Restructuring The Nega(ve Impacts on Sustainability Efforts MG&E Bill Example Fixed vs. Variable Charges DAY charges

147 views • 13 slides
121 Monmouth St. A mixed use development / A\ \ Borough of Red Bank Planning:

121 Monmouth St. A mixed use development / A\ \ Borough of Red Bank Planning:

121 Monmouth St. A mixed use development / A\ \ Borough of Red Bank Planning: Master Plan Re-Examination Adopted Match 4, 2019 Red Bank Master Plan & Re- Examination Mayor Pasquale Menna Planning Board Members: Dan Mancuso -

519 views • 23 slides
Examples of symmetric primitives D. J. Bernstein message len Permutation fixed Compression

Examples of symmetric primitives D. J. Bernstein message len Permutation fixed Compression

1 Examples of symmetric primitives D. J. Bernstein message len Permutation fixed Compression function fixed Block cipher fixed Tweakable block cipher fixed Hash function variable MAC (without nonce) variable MAC (using nonce)

1.08k views • 107 slides
Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration II Numerical Analysis (9th Edition)

Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration II Numerical Analysis (9th Edition)

Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration II Numerical Analysis (9th Edition) R L Burden & J D Faires Beamer Presentation Slides prepared by John Carroll Dublin City University 2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning c

1.44k views • 111 slides
Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration I Numerical Analysis (9th Edition)

Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration I Numerical Analysis (9th Edition)

Solutions of Equations in One Variable Fixed-Point Iteration I Numerical Analysis (9th Edition) R L Burden & J D Faires Beamer Presentation Slides prepared by John Carroll Dublin City University 2011 Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning c

1.23k views • 101 slides
Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 3: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random

Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 3: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random

Packages Dyestuff Mixed models Penicillin Pastes Fixed-effects Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 3: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random effects Douglas Bates University of Wisconsin - Madison and R Development Core

900 views • 78 slides
Curve Clustering and Functional Mixed Models. Modeling, variable selection and application to

Curve Clustering and Functional Mixed Models. Modeling, variable selection and application to

Curve Clustering and Functional Mixed Models. Modeling, variable selection and application to Genomics Franck Picard, LBBE - Lyon Madison Giacofci LJK (Grenoble) Sophie Lambert-Lacroix (TIMC - Grenoble) Guillemette Marot (Univ. Lille 2) Carlos

683 views • 45 slides
Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 1: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random

Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 1: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random

Mixed models in R using the lme4 package Part 1: Linear mixed models with simple, scalar random effects Douglas Bates 2011-03-16 Contents 1 Packages 1 2 Dyestuff 2 3 Mixed models 5 4 Penicillin 10 5 Pastes 14 6 Fixed-effects 19

598 views • 27 slides
Examination of the Impact of Cancer Telegenetics among a Rural Patient Population: Comparison

Examination of the Impact of Cancer Telegenetics among a Rural Patient Population: Comparison

Examination of the Impact of Cancer Telegenetics among a Rural Patient Population: Comparison with Traditional InPerson Services NNECOS Annual Meeting 2016 Susan Miesfeldt, MD Maine Medical Center This work was partially funded by the

271 views • 16 slides
Week 8, Lectures 1 & 2 : Fixed-, Random-, and Mixed-Effects models 1. The repeated measures

Week 8, Lectures 1 & 2 : Fixed-, Random-, and Mixed-Effects models 1. The repeated measures

Week 8, Lectures 1 & 2 : Fixed-, Random-, and Mixed-Effects models 1. The repeated measures design, where each of n Ss is measured k times, is a popular one in Psych. We approach this design in 2 ways: 1. As a generalisation of the paired

728 views • 61 slides
Why Mixed Effects Models? Mixed Effects Models Recap/Intro Three issues with ANOVA

Why Mixed Effects Models? Mixed Effects Models Recap/Intro Three issues with ANOVA

Why Mixed Effects Models? Mixed Effects Models Recap/Intro Three issues with ANOVA Multiple random effects Categorical data Focus on fixed effects What mixed effects models do Random slopes Link functions Iterative

575 views • 38 slides
DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2015 OVERVIEW

DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2015 OVERVIEW

DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2015 OVERVIEW DSH Examination Policy DSH Year 2015 Examination Timeline DSH Year 2015 Examination Impact Paid Claims Data Review Review of DSH

1.27k views • 109 slides
Basic SQL types String Char(n): fixed length. Padded Varchar(n): variable length

Basic SQL types String Char(n): fixed length. Padded Varchar(n): variable length

Basic SQL types String Char(n): fixed length. Padded Varchar(n): variable length Number Integer: 32 bit Decimal(5,2): 999.99 Real, Double: 32 bit, 64 bit Datetime Date: 2002-01-15 Time:

733 views • 3 slides
DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2017 OVERVIEW DSH

DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2017 OVERVIEW DSH

DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL (DSH) PAYMENT EXAMINATION UPDATE DSH YEAR 2017 OVERVIEW DSH Examination Policy DSH Year 2017 Examination Timeline DSH Year 2017 Examination Impact Paid Claims Data Review Review of DSH Year

1.43k views • 96 slides
Guidance Note 3 Introduction to Mixed Methods in Impact Evaluation Michael Bamberger

Guidance Note 3 Introduction to Mixed Methods in Impact Evaluation Michael Bamberger

Guidance Note 3 Introduction to Mixed Methods in Impact Evaluation Michael Bamberger Independent Consultant Outline 2 A. Why mixed methods (MM)? B. Four decisions for designing a MM evaluation C. Using MM to strengthen each stage of an

690 views • 39 slides
Nworgu, Q, C. (2019) A critical examination of the impact of Social Media on online small

Nworgu, Q, C. (2019) A critical examination of the impact of Social Media on online small

Nworgu, Q, C. (2019) A critical examination of the impact of Social Media on online small businesses owned and run by women entrepreneurs: A case study of London-based female E-entrepreneurs A Presentation for the KIE-WEF Collaborative

519 views • 13 slides
THE EXAMINATION BOARD INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXAMINATION BOARD Luuk Schoenmakers, LLM, MSc

THE EXAMINATION BOARD INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXAMINATION BOARD Luuk Schoenmakers, LLM, MSc

THE EXAMINATION BOARD INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXAMINATION BOARD Luuk Schoenmakers, LLM, MSc Chairman examination board SM&O/ISMB 1 CONTENT What is the examination board? What is the TER? BSA first year Fraud/plagiarism 2

459 views • 15 slides
Chapter 10 Attaway MATLAB 4E Variable # of Arguments So far in the functions that we ve

Chapter 10 Attaway MATLAB 4E Variable # of Arguments So far in the functions that we ve

Advanced Functions Chapter 10 Attaway MATLAB 4E Variable # of Arguments So far in the functions that we ve written, there has been a fixed number of input arguments and a fixed number of output arguments It is possible to have a

636 views • 24 slides
Overview of this module Course 02429 Design Matrix 1 Analysis of correlated data: Mixed Linear

Overview of this module Course 02429 Design Matrix 1 Analysis of correlated data: Mixed Linear

Overview of this module Course 02429 Design Matrix 1 Analysis of correlated data: Mixed Linear Models Fixed model Mixed model Module 4: Theory, Part I Mixed model 2 Definition, Matrix form The likelihood function Per Bruun Brockhoff The

516 views • 7 slides
Session 11 More on mixed effects modelling A Generalized Linear Mixed Model Recovery of the

Session 11 More on mixed effects modelling A Generalized Linear Mixed Model Recovery of the

Session 11 More on mixed effects modelling A Generalized Linear Mixed Model Recovery of the benthos after trawling on the Great Barrier Reef 6 Control plots, 6 Impact plots Visited 2 times prior to treatment and 4 times afterwards

981 views • 22 slides
Fixed Income Strategy Mixed Messages in Money Markets | March 2019 Margaret Kerins, CFA Global

Fixed Income Strategy Mixed Messages in Money Markets | March 2019 Margaret Kerins, CFA Global

Fixed Income Strategy Mixed Messages in Money Markets | March 2019 Margaret Kerins, CFA Global Head of FICC Macro Strategy Margaret.Kerins@bmo.com 312-845-2687 0 Top Seismic Shifts Impacting Money Markets Bank Fed Balance Regulatory Sheet

450 views • 26 slides

More recommend