algebraic semantics and model completeness for
play

Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public Announcement Logic Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh TACL 2011, Marseille 28 July 2011 Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic


  1. Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public Announcement Logic Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh TACL 2011, Marseille 28 July 2011 Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  2. PAL Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  3. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  4. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Language Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  5. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Language ϕ ::= p ∈ AtProp | ¬ ϕ | ϕ ∨ ψ | � ϕ | � α � ϕ. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  6. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Language ϕ ::= p ∈ AtProp | ¬ ϕ | ϕ ∨ ψ | � ϕ | � α � ϕ. Axioms Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  7. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Language ϕ ::= p ∈ AtProp | ¬ ϕ | ϕ ∨ ψ | � ϕ | � α � ϕ. Axioms � α � p ↔ ( α ∧ p ) 1 � α �¬ ϕ ↔ ( α ∧ ¬� α � ϕ ) 2 � α � ( ϕ ∨ ψ ) ↔ ( � α � ϕ ∨ � α � ψ ) 3 � α � � ϕ ↔ ( α ∧ � ( α ∧ � α � ϕ )) . 4 Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  8. PAL The simplest dynamic epistemic logic. Language ϕ ::= p ∈ AtProp | ¬ ϕ | ϕ ∨ ψ | � ϕ | � α � ϕ. Axioms � α � p ↔ ( α ∧ p ) 1 � α �¬ ϕ ↔ ( α ∧ ¬� α � ϕ ) 2 � α � ( ϕ ∨ ψ ) ↔ ( � α � ϕ ∨ � α � ψ ) 3 � α � � ϕ ↔ ( α ∧ � ( α ∧ � α � ϕ )) . 4 Not amenable to a standard algebraic treatment. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  9. Semantics of PAL Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  10. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  11. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M , w � � α � ϕ iff Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  12. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  13. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M α , w � ϕ, M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α and Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  14. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M α , w � ϕ, M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α and Relativized model M α = ( W α , R α , V α ) : Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  15. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M α , w � ϕ, M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α and Relativized model M α = ( W α , R α , V α ) : W α = [ [ α ] ] M , Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  16. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M α , w � ϕ, M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α and Relativized model M α = ( W α , R α , V α ) : W α = [ [ α ] ] M , R α = R ∩ ( W α × W α ) , Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  17. Semantics of PAL PAL-models are S5 Kripke models: M = ( W , R , V ) M α , w � ϕ, M , w � � α � ϕ iff M , w � α and Relativized model M α = ( W α , R α , V α ) : W α = [ [ α ] ] M , R α = R ∩ ( W α × W α ) , V α ( p ) = V ( p ) ∩ W α . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  18. Methodology based on duality theory: Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  19. Methodology based on duality theory: Dualize epistemic update on Kripke models to epistemic update on algebras . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  20. Methodology based on duality theory: Dualize epistemic update on Kripke models to epistemic update on algebras . Generalize epistemic update on algebras to much wider classes of algebras. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  21. Methodology based on duality theory: Dualize epistemic update on Kripke models to epistemic update on algebras . Generalize epistemic update on algebras to much wider classes of algebras. Dualize back to relational models for non classically based logics. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  22. Algebraic models Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  23. Algebraic models An algebraic model is a tuple M = ( A , V ) s.t. A is a monadic Heyting algebra and V : AtProp → A . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  24. Algebraic models An algebraic model is a tuple M = ( A , V ) s.t. A is a monadic Heyting algebra and V : AtProp → A . For every A and every a ∈ A , define the equivalence relation ≡ a : Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  25. Algebraic models An algebraic model is a tuple M = ( A , V ) s.t. A is a monadic Heyting algebra and V : AtProp → A . For every A and every a ∈ A , define the equivalence relation ≡ a : for every b , c ∈ A , b ≡ a c iff b ∧ a = c ∧ a . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  26. Algebraic models An algebraic model is a tuple M = ( A , V ) s.t. A is a monadic Heyting algebra and V : AtProp → A . For every A and every a ∈ A , define the equivalence relation ≡ a : for every b , c ∈ A , b ≡ a c iff b ∧ a = c ∧ a . Let [ b ] a be the equivalence class of b ∈ A . Let A a := A / ≡ a A a is ordered: [ b ] ≤ [ c ] iff b ′ ≤ A c ′ for some b ′ ∈ [ b ] and some c ′ ∈ [ c ] . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  27. Algebraic models An algebraic model is a tuple M = ( A , V ) s.t. A is a monadic Heyting algebra and V : AtProp → A . For every A and every a ∈ A , define the equivalence relation ≡ a : for every b , c ∈ A , b ≡ a c iff b ∧ a = c ∧ a . Let [ b ] a be the equivalence class of b ∈ A . Let A a := A / ≡ a A a is ordered: [ b ] ≤ [ c ] iff b ′ ≤ A c ′ for some b ′ ∈ [ b ] and some c ′ ∈ [ c ] . Let π a : A → A a be the canonical projection. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  28. Properties of the (pseudo)-congruence Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  29. Properties of the (pseudo)-congruence For every A and every a ∈ A , Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  30. Properties of the (pseudo)-congruence For every A and every a ∈ A , ≡ a is a congruence if A is a BA / HA / BDL / Fr. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  31. Properties of the (pseudo)-congruence For every A and every a ∈ A , ≡ a is a congruence if A is a BA / HA / BDL / Fr. ≡ a is not a congruence w.r.t. modal operators. Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

  32. Properties of the (pseudo)-congruence For every A and every a ∈ A , ≡ a is a congruence if A is a BA / HA / BDL / Fr. ≡ a is not a congruence w.r.t. modal operators. For every b ∈ A there exists a unique c ∈ A s.t. c ∈ [ b ] a and c ≤ a . Minghui Ma, Alessandra Palmigiano, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh Algebraic Semantics and Model Completeness for Intuitionistic Public

Recommend


More recommend