AE Faculty Consultant: Richard Behr The Department of Architectural - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presented by: Matthew Peyton AE Faculty Consultant: Richard Behr The Department of Architectural Engineering The Pennsylvania State University April 13 th 2011

Presentation Outline  Introduction  Building Stats and Features  Location  Existing Structural Design  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review  Gravity System  Lateral System  Breadth Topics  Proposal Review  Construction Management  Acoustical Study  Recommendations & Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats and Features  Location  Existing Structural Design  Structural Depth Analysis Introduction  Breadth Topics  Recommendations & Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats and Features  Location Building Stats Building Features  Existing Structural Design  174 private intensive care and medical/surgical rooms. Size: 216,000 s.f.  Structural Depth Analysis Number of stories: 12 Above Grade  360 o patient access for improved care. Cost: $161 Million  Breadth Topics Construction duration: Summer  Two story atrium connected to the lobby with a living 2010 – Fall 2011 roof.  Recommendations & Conclusion  Cantilevered aluminum lovers with glazing as lobby canopy.  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats & Features Building Location  Location  Existing Structural  Existing Hospital Campus Design  Northern Virginia  Structural Depth Analysis  Outside the Capital  Breadth Topics Beltway  Recommendations & Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats & Features  Location Existing Structural System  Existing Structural Existing Patient Tower Caissons Foundation Design  Piles  Structural Depth Analysis  Drilled piles from 2 – 12 per column  Pile caps pored monolithic with Slab.  Breadth Topics  Grade beams  Recommendations & New Pile Detail  24” to 36” deep Conclusion  5” Slab On Grade  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats & Features  Location Existing Structural System  Existing Structural Gravity System Design  Columns  Structural Depth Analysis  Typical size 24” x 24”  7,000 psi concrete floors 1 – 4  Breadth Topics  5,000 psi concrete floors 5 – roof  6” deep column capitals  Recommendations & Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats & Features  Location Existing Structural System  Existing Structural Gravity System Design  Floor Slab  Structural Depth Analysis  29’ x 29’ bays  9.5” 2 - Way flat plate.  Breadth Topics  5,000 psi concrete floors 1 – 4  4,000 psi concrete floors 5 – roof  Recommendations &  10.5” thick slab for mechanical floor Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Building Stats & Features  Location Existing Structural System  Existing Structural Lateral Force Resisting System Design  Concrete moment frame  Structural Depth Analysis  Typical 24” x 24” concrete columns  9.5” Two -way slab  Breadth Topics  Reinforced concrete shear cores  Recommendations &  2 Shear cores Conclusion  Surrounding the stairs and the elevator  12” thick reinforced concrete  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review  Gravity System  Lateral System  Breadth Topics Structural Depth Analysis  Recommendations & Conclusion  Acknowledgments & Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Proposal Review  Gravity System  Lateral System Design a Steel Frame System with Composite  Breadth Topics Beam and Hollow core plank and lateral X bracing  Recommendations &  Goals Conclusion  Decrease construction time  Acknowledgments &  Decrease building weigh Questions  Decrease total cost Matthew Peyton Structural Option  Maintain the low floor to floor height AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower Interior Column Sizing  Introduction Virginia USA Floor Column Size  Structural Depth Analysis W12 x 50 Roof  Proposal Review 11 W12 x 50 Gravity System Redesign - Column  Gravity System 10 W12 x 50  Lateral System 9 W12 x 50  W12 Steel Columns 8 W12 x 79  Breadth Topics 7 W12 x 79  Live loads in accordance with ASCE 7-10 6 W12 x 79  Recommendations & W12 x 79  Splices every 2 or 4 stories 5 Conclusion 4 W12 x 120  Only W12’s to increase shape redundancy  Acknowledgments & W12 x 120 3 Questions 2 W12 x 120  Designed by hand and checked with an Etabs W12 x 120 1 model Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Gravity System Redesign - Column  Gravity System  Lateral System  Advantages  Breadth Topics o Lighter than concrete o Quicker erection than concrete  Recommendations &  Disadvantage Conclusion o Requires Fireproofing  Acknowledgments & o More columns per floor Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Gravity System Redesign - Column  Gravity System  Lateral System  Advantages  Breadth Topics o Lighter than concrete o Quicker erection than concrete  Recommendations &  Disadvantage Conclusion o Requires Fireproofing  Acknowledgments & o More columns per floor Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Gravity System Redesign - Column  Gravity System  Lateral System  Advantages  Breadth Topics o Lighter than concrete o Quicker erection than concrete  Recommendations &  Disadvantage Conclusion o Requires Fireproofing  Acknowledgments & o More columns per floor Questions Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Gravity System Redesign – Floor Slab  Gravity System  Lateral System  Girder Slab system  Breadth Topics  Composite action  Recommendations &  8” Hollow core plank Conclusion  2” Concrete topping  Acknowledgments & Questions  Modified W flanges and top flange Found at www.girder-slab.com Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Hollow core plank design Virginia USA  Live load = 80psf  Structural Depth Analysis  Dead Load = 10psf  Proposal Review  SDL = 25 Gravity System Redesign - Floor Slab  Gravity System  Max span = 29”  Lateral System  Girder Slab system  Normal weight concrete  Breadth Topics  Composite action  2” concrete topping  Recommendations &  8” Hollow core plank Conclusion Results from PCI Design Handbook  78 – S  2” Concrete topping  Acknowledgments &  7 strands at 8/16” dia. Questions  Modified W flanges and top flange Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr

Hospital Patient Tower  Introduction Virginia USA  Structural Depth Analysis  Proposal Review Gravity System Redesign - Floor Slab  Gravity System  Lateral System  Girder Slab system  Breadth Topics  Composite action  Recommendations &  8” Hollow core plank Conclusion  2” Concrete topping  Acknowledgments & Questions  Modified W flanges and top flange Matthew Peyton Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Advisor: Prof. Behr