Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Advisory Board Quarterly Meeting First Quarter FY10 Presented to District Energy Advisory Board November 19, 2009
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Agenda 1. Call to Order 2. Review & Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes 3. Review of DES Contractor Performance 4. Natural Gas Purchasing Status 5. Financial Reports – 1 st Qtr FY10 6. FY09-10 Budget Status Report 7. Capital Projects Review and Status Report 8. DES Emergency Response Plan 9. Adjourn 2
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 1. Call to Order 2. Review and Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes 3
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 3. Review of DES Contractor Performance Contractor (CNDE) is in compliance with their contractual obligations for FY10. Excellent Performance – No Improvement Necessary Satisfactory Performance – Some Improvement Could Be Made Poor Performance – Much Improvement Necessary 4
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Summary Table 3: Customer Cost Comparison for the Previous 12 Months Steam Chilled Water ($ millions) ($ millions) 10/07 10/08- % Diff. 10/07 10/08- % Diff. –9/08 9/09 –9/08 9/09 Private $2.350 $2.197 -6.5% $3.884 $3.564 -8.2% State $2.898 $2.805 -3.2% $3.224 $3.213 <1% Metro $2.701 $2.636 -2.4% $3.055 $3.053 <1% Aggregate $7.950 $7.638 -3.9% $10.163 $9.830 -3.3% *FY08 MFA = $2,193,075; FY09 MFA = $3,217,986 post-True-up; MFA 5 not included in values shown
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM FY10 Operations: Steam 60,000,000 1,000 900 P 50,000,000 o 800 u 700 n 40,000,000 d 600 s HDD 30,000,000 500 o 400 f 20,000,000 300 S 200 t 10,000,000 e 100 a 0 0 m 6 Sales Sendout Losses HDD
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM FY10 Operations: Chilled Water 9,000,000 450 8,000,000 400 7,000,000 350 6,000,000 300 T o 5,000,000 250 CDD n 4,000,000 200 h r 3,000,000 150 s 2,000,000 100 1,000,000 50 0 0 7 Sales Sendout Losses CDD
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Performance Measurement FY10: Steam Electric Conversion 9.00 8.00 7.00 k 6.00 W 5.00 h r 4.00 / 3.00 M l 2.00 b 1.00 - GMQ Elec to Steam FY09-FY10 Actual Elec to Steam FY09-FY10 8
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Performance Measurement FY10: Steam Plant Efficiency 2 1.8 1.6 D 1.4 k t 1.2 h 1 e 0.8 r 0.6 m 0.4 / 0.2 M l 0 b GMQ Fuel to Steam FY09-FY10 Actual Fuel to Steam FY09-FY10 9
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Performance Measurement FY10: Steam Water Conversion 3,500,000 G 3,000,000 a l 2,500,000 l o 2,000,000 n s 1,500,000 o 1,000,000 f 500,000 W a - t e r GMQ Water to Steam FY09-FY10 Actual Water to Steam FY09-FY10 10
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Performance Measurement FY10: Chilled Water Electric Conversion 1.20 1.00 k W 0.80 h r 0.60 / t 0.40 o n h 0.20 r 0.00 GMQ Elec to CHW FY09-FY10 Actual Elec to CHW FY09-FY10 11
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Performance Measurement FY10: Chilled Water Water Conversion 6 5 g 4 a l 3 / t o 2 n h r 1 0 GMQ W ater to CHW FY09 -FY10 Actual W ater to CHW FY09 -FY10 12
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Water Treatment • Steam/Condensate – Corrosion – Iron – Hardness – Chlorine/Sulfite • Condensing Water – Conductivity – Biologicals • Chilled Water – Hardness – Corrosion 13 – Biologicals
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM EGF Walkthrough Quarterly Inspection Process • Equipment Maintenance • Operations • Electrical • Housekeeping • Building Structure • Building Exterior and Grounds 14
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM EDS Walkthrough Quarterly Inspection Process • Manhole/Tunnel Housekeeping • Maintenance Items – Insulation Repair/Replacement – Water Infiltration – Corrosion of Structural Metal Components • Safety Items 15
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 4. Natural Gas Purchasing Natural Gas Purchasing Review Table 4: FY10 Gas Spending & Budget Comparison Figure 4: Actual and Projected Gas Cost Comparison for FY10 16
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Table 4: FY10 Gas Spending & Budget Comparison Actual FY10 Budget FY10 To date (Sept 30) Steam Sendout (Mlbs) 40,821 39,655 Fuel Use (Dth) 57,844 57,500 Plant Eff (Dth/Mlb) 1.413 1.450 Total Gas Cost $356,454 $564,995 Unit Cost of Fuel ($/Dth) $6.162 $9.826 17
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Actual and Projected Gas Cost Comparison for FY10 $16.00 FY09 FY09 FY10 FY07 FY08 FY08 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $ - Actual & Projected Unit Costs Budgeted Unit Costs Market Unit Price 18
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 5. Financial Reports: 1 st Qtr FY10 Item F Y10 Total E xpens es Percent of Budget to Date F Y10 Budget FOC: Bas i c $ 3,976,200 $ 963,043 24.22% FOC: 9th Chi l l er $ 37,200 $ 9,024 24.26% FOC: Change Order 6A $ 73,400 $ 17,816 24.27% FOC: Change Order 6B $ 64,300 $ 15,597 24.26% Chem i cal s $ 161,200 $ 37,896 23.51% E ngi neeri ng $ 26,200 $ 3,801 14.51% Ins urance $ 43,700 $ - 0.00% M arketi ng: CE PS Sal es A cti vi ty $ 9,800 $ - 0.00% M etro M arketi ng $ 35,000 $ 5,212 14.89% Incenti ve Paym ents $ - $ - n.a. Proj ect A dm i ni s trati on $ 24,000 $ - 0.00% M etro Increm ental Cos t $ 526,400 $ 94,387 17.93% FE A : Steam $ - $ 14,041 n.a. FE A : Chi l l ed Water $ - $ 113,028 n.a. A RFA $ - $ 13,987 n.a. M etro Credi t $ - $ (140,933) n.a. Water/Sewer $ 689,600 $ 127,546 18.50% Natural Gas /Propane $ 4,692,900 $ 355,953 7.58% E l ectri ci ty $ 5,034,100 $ 1,264,600 25.12% E DS Repai r & Im provem ent $ 176,500 $ 35,648 20.20% E DS Surcharge $ 70,600 $ - 0.00% S ub-total Operations $ 15,641,100 $ 2,930,645 18.74% 2002 Bonds $ 4,362,900 $ 1,090,698 25.00% 2005 Bonds $ 627,600 $ - 0.00% FY07 Proj ects $ 227,800 $ - 0.00% FY08 Proj ects $ 220,500 $ - 0.00% Debt Servi ce Interes t Revenue $ (123,700) $ (154) 0.12% Oper. Res erve Fundi ng Depos i t $ - $ - n.a. S ub-total Debt S erv ice $ 5,315,100 $ 1,090,544 20.52% Total E xpens es $ 20,956,200 $ 4,021,189 19.19% Cus tomer Rev enues $ 18,512,100 $ 3,543,483 19.14% 19 Total M etro F unding Amount $ 2,444,100 $ 477,706 19.55%
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 6. FY2009-2010 Budget Status Review Spent to End of FY10 Balance to Date FY09 (09/30/09) Spending R&I Projects $764,130 $35,648 $485,062 2005B Bond $7,920,090 $5,604 $260,807 2007 Bond $2,620,771 $0 $237,729 2008 Bond $1,846,622 $1,023,574 $8,304 2010 Bond $0 $6,088 $2,403,912 Total $10,530,842 $1,070,914 $3,395,814 20
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 7. Capital Projects Review Active Capital Projects • DES 041/054: Symphony CND – closed • DES 044: STM Repair & CND Replacement MH 5 to MH 9 – closed • DES 0441: Modification of Manhole 9 - closed • DES 046: Ryman CND – closed • DES 050: MH Insulation – in construction/ongoing (DES 060 in FY 2010) • DES 051: Replacement of 4 th Avenue Tunnel Condensate Slip Joint - closed • DES 055: Rebuild of MH “C” – closed • DES 056: STM Repair & CND Replacement to Citizen’s Plaza – closed 21 • DES 057: STM & CND Valve Replacement: Phase I & II – closed
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM FY 2010 Proposed Projects • DES 048: Tunnel Lighting Replacement Phase III • DES 059: CJC Steam & Condensate Line Replacement – in design • DES 060: MH Insulation – in construction/ongoing • DES 061: Manhole & Tunnel Steel Corrosion Repair & Prevention • DES 062: Wildhorse Stm & Cnd Line Replacement – in construction • DES 063: Sump Pump Installation in MH A, B & M – currently bidding • DES 067: Tunnel Rock Repair – in design • DES 068: St Mary’s Condensate Tempering • DES 069: Municipal Auditorium Condensate Tempering • DES 070: MH 6 to 23 Condensate Line Replacement – in design • DES 071: Hermitage Hotel Service Modifications • DES 072: Sheraton Hotel Steam and Condensate Replacement 22
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Music City Center & New Hotel DES Location 23
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Proposed Music City Center & New Hotel • Music City Center – 3,500 tons – 35,000 pph • New Hotel – 1,500 tons – 18,000 pph • Est $1,500,000 (~55% ) Reduction in MFA • No Impact on Existing Customers • New Load Approaches EGF Capacity Limit 24
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM 8. DES Emergency Response Plan • Metro Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan • Constellation Energy Emergency Response Plan • Customer Response Plans 25
Metro Nashville DISTRICT ENERGY SYSTEM Metro Disaster Recovery Plan • Communications Between – Metro – CEPS – TEG – Customers • EGF/EDS Functionality • Relocation of Command • Continuity of Services • Priority Customers 26
Recommend
More recommend
