academic integrity by design
play

Academic Integrity By Design November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Academic Integrity By Design November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, Executive Director of Academic Technology Kurt Daw, Professor of Theatre Arts Agenda Agenda 1 4 Who really cheats? Is there another Services way? F2F vs Online Universal


  1. Academic Integrity By Design November 15, 2017 Maggie Beers, Executive Director of Academic Technology Kurt Daw, Professor of Theatre Arts

  2. Agenda Agenda 1 4 Who really cheats? Is there another Services way? F2F vs Online Universal Design for Learning 2 5 Who’s watching? Design Showcase Physical & virtual proctoring Academic Integrity Models 3 6 What’s the cost? Discussion Campus resource dilemmas What’s a campus to do?

  3. Who really cheats & why? What the research says

  4. in·teg·ri·ty inˈteɡrədē / noun 1 .the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness. Merriam-Webster

  5. cheat CHēt / verb 1. act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, especially in a game or examination. Merriam-Webster

  6. One Time Performance Image Source: http://www.travelthruhistory.tv/quick-history- olympic-games/

  7. High Stakes

  8. Extrinsic Motivation

  9. Low Self- "Princess Alice is watching you": Children's belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating Efficacy

  10. Do students cheat more online vs F2F? No significant difference.

  11. Cheating is not solely the fault of our students or the declining ethical standards of the millennial generation, but a product of our testing-oriented and performance- obsessed culture.

  12. Who’s watching? Physical & Virtual Proctoring

  13. In-person proctoring During exams In-Class Testing Center Clickers Reservation & Fee required Register with http://www.todayifoundout.com/

  14. Virtual & High-Tech Approaches • Remote in-person proctoring • Virtual recording for review • Algorithm identifies suspicious behaviors • Typing style identification • Fingerprint & face recognition • Text-matching • Writing style identification

  15. What’s the cost? Campus resource requirements

  16. Virtual Proctoring Contenders Usability & Functionality ProctorU Proctor.io Respondus    Schedule time/date for exam X X  Browser lockdown    Video recording X X  Real- time “live” monitoring X X  “Suspicious” behavior flagged X   Monitors student’s computer activity    Student authentication    LMS integration

  17. Virtual Proctoring Costs Virtual Proctoring Annual Pricing University Solution Cost Parameters Resources $650,000 1 exam (90 mins) per None Live proctoring student (ProctorU) $32,500 1200 concurrent 0.5 FTE staff Smart Browser + licenses Algorithm (Proctor.io) $11,500 Annual fee + 1200 0.5 FTE staff Smart Browser concurrent licenses (Respondus) 13,000=online students per semester 1,200=largest online course

  18. Is there another way? Instructional Design Strategies

  19. Much of the research and advice on cheating... focuses on the learner, and on how we can better police or modify the learner.

  20. [But] the amount of cheating that takes place in an educational situation may very well depend on the structure of the learning environment . From Cheating Lessons, James M. Lang

  21. learn lərn / verb 1. gain or acquire knowledge of or skill in (something) by study, experience, or being taught. Merriam-Webster

  22. Faculty showcase Academic integrity strategies

  23. Designs that promote academic integrity Instructional design principles and strategies Foster Intrinsic Focus on Learning over Motivation Performance Academic Integrity Lower Assessment Instill Self- Efficacy Stakes (James M. Lange, 2013)

  24. Focus on mastery over performance In this class we focus on the pursuit of understanding .

  25. Remove the competition from grades

  26. Lower assessment stakes The more pressure put on a single exam, the more likely a student will use any means necessary to succeed on it.

  27. Foster intrinsic motivation My course has more to offer than just the extrinsic reward of a grade.

  28. Instill self-efficacy I have something wonderful to teach you. I am going to challenge you. You are capable of meeting that challenge.

  29. Metacognitive Surveys Knowing what you know • Surveys, not tests • Ask about familiarity • Preview test content areas • Provide focus for studying

  30. The environments which reduce the incentive and opportunity to cheat... will lead to greater and deeper learning by your students. From Cheating Lessons

  31. Discussion What’s a campus to do?

  32. Thank you. A special thank you to Monica Muñoz for her support in researching this presentation and supporting our Academic Integrity efforts at SF State.

  33. Contact Us Academic Technology Email/Website Academic Phone Technology iteach@sfsu.edu (415) 405-5555 San Francisco State University At.sfsu.edu 1600 Holloway Avenue San Francisco, CA 94132

Recommend


More recommend