a visual analytics approach to comparing cohorts of event
play

A Visual Analytics Approach to Comparing Cohorts of Event Sequences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Visual Analytics Approach to Comparing Cohorts of Event Sequences Sana Malik, Fan Du, Megan Monroe, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Catherine Plaisant, & Ben Shneiderman May 29, 2014 HCIL Symposium Time-stamped event data is widespread


  1. A Visual Analytics Approach to Comparing Cohorts of Event Sequences 
 Sana Malik, Fan Du, Megan Monroe, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Catherine Plaisant, & Ben Shneiderman May 29, 2014 — HCIL Symposium

  2. Time-stamped event data is widespread

  3. Time-stamped event data is widespread → E-commerce

  4. Time-stamped event data is widespread → E-commerce → Online education

  5. Time-stamped event data is widespread → E-commerce → Online education → Patient medical histories

  6. Often, we compare groups in these datasets

  7. Often, we compare groups in these datasets → E-commerce

  8. Often, we compare groups in these datasets → E-commerce

  9. Existing tools fall into two categories.

  10. 1. Visual

  11. Aspirin -> Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Exit 38.37, 0.0, 4.11e-123 Emergency -> ICU -> Exit 24.61, 0.0, 2.11e-73 Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit -> ICU 2. Statistical 5.26, 0.0, 4.12e-15 Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Exit 5.26, 0.0, 4.12e-15 Aspirin -> Emergency -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 7.89, 3.22, 1.20e-06 Aspirin -> Emergency -> ICU -> Intermediate Care -> Exit 4.15, 0.0, 4.22e-12 Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Intermediate Care -> Exit 2.97, 0.0, 7.02e-09 Aspirin -> Emergency -> ICU -> Exit 2.80, 0.0, 2.02e-08 Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 1.44, 0.0, 9.83e-05 Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 1.01, 0.0, 0.00 Aspirin -> Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Intermediate Care -> Exit 0.76, 0.0, 0.00 Aspirin -> Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 0.0, 1.61, 3.37e-05 Aspirin -> Emergency -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Exit 0.0, 2.37, 2.84e-07 Aspirin -> Emergency -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 3.82, 6.45, 0.00 Emergency -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Exit 0.0, 4.07, 7.17e-12 Emergency -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> ICU -> Normal Floor Bed -> Exit 0.0, 4.24, 2.48e-12

  12. visualization + statistics = CoCo (Cohort Comparison)

  13. Visualizing Statistical Results

  14. Visualizing Statistical Results

  15. Visualizing Statistical Results

  16. Visualizing Statistical Results

  17. Visualizing Statistical Results

  18. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  19. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  20. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  21. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  22. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  23. Visualizing Statistical Results Emergency Normal Floor Bed

  24. Visualizing Statistical Results (59.8%) (10.1%) Emergency Normal Floor Bed Δ = 49.7% (p = 0.001)

  25. Visualizing Statistical Results

  26. Visualizing Statistical Results

  27. Visualizing Statistical Results

  28. Visualizing Statistical Results

  29. 1. Summary Statistics

  30. 2. Prevalence Metrics → Events

  31. 2. Prevalence Metrics → Events → Event sequences

  32. 2. Prevalence Metrics → Events → Event sequences → Co-occurring (non-sequential) events

  33. 2. Prevalence Metrics → Events → Event sequences → Co-occurring (non-sequential) events → Outcomes of records

  34. 3. Time Metrics → Absolute times

  35. 3. Time Metrics → Absolute times → Duration of events, gaps, and overlaps

  36. 4. Attribute Metrics → Event attributes Emergency | Doctor = Smith

  37. 4. Attribute Metrics → Event attributes → Record attributes

  38. Pilot User Study → 10 participants → Used CoCo & side-by-side EventFlow for analysis → Counted the number of insights users made

  39. Pilot User Study

  40. Pilot User Study “ I like the fact that you give me two different tools. I can look at the data in different ways ” ! → 9/10 participants started with EventFlow for an “overview” → Used CoCo to confirm findings

  41. Future Work → Support a variety of statistical tests → Add visualizations of distributions → Support exploration and search of sequences

  42. A Visual Analytics Approach to Comparing Cohorts of Event Sequences 
 Sana Malik, Fan Du, Megan Monroe, Eberechukwu Onukwugha, Catherine Plaisant & Ben Shneiderman For more information & to become a CoCo user: web www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/coco email maliks@cs.umd.edu ! ! ! Supported by Oracle and the University of Maryland Center for Health-related Informatics and Bioimaging (CHIB), a unit of UMIACS

Recommend


More recommend