a two stage m odel to reveal a university s research data
play

A two-stage m odel to reveal a universitys research data landscape - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A two-stage m odel to reveal a universitys research data landscape and facultys research data practices Thomas Seyffertitz & Michael Katzmayr INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS INFORMATION, BERLIN, 6-7 MAY 2019 Vienna


  1. A two-stage m odel to reveal a university’s research data landscape and faculty’s research data practices Thomas Seyffertitz & Michael Katzmayr INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS INFORMATION, BERLIN, 6-7 MAY 2019

  2. Vienna University of Econom ics and Business Characteristics & Tim eline 10/ 2016 Academ ic units : • Start of systematic engagement with RDM Research 11 academic DPs staff: (60 institutes), 15 research institutes 2017 about 770 FTEs • Empirical analysis of the research output ~ 6 0 0 articles in 01/ 2018 scholarly journals • Presentation to the university management per year 05-11/ 2018 • Development of a RDM-Policy for WU No institutional RDM at that time BUT 12/ 2018 Development of RDM as a new RDM-concept • FDM-Policy  Legal affairs office „business“ within the com m issioned by library the vice-rector for research 05/ 2019 • FDM-Policy becomes effective! 2

  3. Motivation, Objectives & Research Design Know ledge of the RD landscape is an important Motivation prerequisite for appropriate research data services • Research data landscape : „ What research data do we have at WU ?“ Objectives • Research culture : how do researchers deal with their data; experience, data trends, needs • Case study design – mixed method approach • Stage 1 – Docum ent analysis of research output  Research journal articles ( quantitative aspects ) design & method • Stage 2 – Sem i-structured interview s with researchers, designed along the lifecycle of research data ( qualitative aspects ) 3

  4. Stage 1 – Docum ent Analysis Analysis of Journal Articles Verlag Inform Bezeichnung DP, FI Volltext (0/1) (einzeln) Zitat DOI Gasser, Stephan, Rammerstorfer, DFAS http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.043 1 Elsevier Empir Margarethe, Weinmayer, Karl. Entwi Forthcoming. Markowitz Revisited: ESG s Social Portfolio Engineering. European Thom Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) a max , all st the fu in ou SRIs), --> nu Kastner, Gregor. 2016. Dealing with DFAS http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i05 1 Foundati 1. We Stochastic Volatility in Time Series on for des R Using the R Package stochvol. Journal Open Daten of Statistical Software 69 (5): S. 1-30. Access 2. R-C Statistics (FOAS) Finan Malsiner-Walli, Gertraud, Frühwirth- DFAS http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-014-9500-2 1 Springer 1. Kün Schnatter, Sylvia, Grün, Bettina. 2016. Simul Model-based clustering based on 2. Par sparse finite Gaussian mixtures. 3. Kra Statistics and Computing 26 (1): S. 303- Krabb 324. 4. Iris Extract Deriving CRIS as source Getting fulltext information Data encoding statistical of references paper from fulltext information 4

  5. Stage 2 – Sem i-structured Interviews Rationale & Methodological Aspects  Expert interviews can be very effective  Awareness of certain topics can be increased among the interview partners  Objective: exploring expert knowledge (in terms of technical and process knowledge)  Sample building criteria  Experience with data driven research  Covering all departments  Junior- and senior-researchers included  Interview/ Topic-guide: designed along the researcher’s day-to-day research work and lifecycle of research data  Pre-test & 25 interviews 5

  6. Results – Analysis of the Journal Articles General  Analysed 596 articles published in 2016  ~ 80% without external/ third-party funding  Only 12% funding of papers without RD  Whereas > 33% of articles containing RD received funding  86% quantitative RD  Almost 30% contained both quantitative and qualitative RD 6

  7. Results – Analysis of the Journal Articles What the data are about Percentage of different types of data occurring in articles Economic data; Other data; 20,38% 23,51% Types of data WU Economic data 65 Company data 56 Environm./ Company Social research data 97 natural Technical systems data 11 data; 17,55% science Environmental and natural science data 15 data; Social research Other 75 4,70% data; 30,41% Total frequency over all 319 articles with RD (n= 250, WU) Technical systems data; 3,45% 7

  8. Results - Analysis of Journal Articles Data Form at Types Image; Other; 3,04% 0,34% Video; Percentage of data Audio; 1,35% format types 11,15% occurring in articles Data format types WU (abs.) Image 9 Audio 33 Video 4 Alphanumeric Alphanumeric data 249 data; 84,12% Other 1 Total frequency over all 296 articles with RD (n= 250) 8

  9. Analysing the Interviews Following Meuser and Nagel (1991, 20 0 9) − Transcription − Paraphrase - sequencing of the text according to Analysis of a thematic units single − Coding – ordering paraphrased passages thematically Condensing interview along our topic-guide − Them atic com parison – grouping comparable Analysis passages from interviews across multiple − Conceptualization - generalizing restricted to the interviews empirical data − Theoretical generalization 9

  10. Sem i-structured Interviews - Findings • Some experience existing with funder mandates DMP , research • DMPs have been used for projects funded by DFG , funders ERC , ESRC and Horizon 2020 • Quantitative research methods: Big Data Data trends and • Source: increasingly WWW, Social media developments • Storage; computer performance • Data are scattered, data management strategy Managing RD within within departments rather an exception the research process • Use of external cloud-systems • Quantitative RD: Publishers‘ data-policies relevant RD in the publication • Qualitative RD: data usually not published; no process policies (e.g. sociology) 10

  11. Sem i-structured Interviews – Findings ctd. • I n a pragmatic and case-based way Archiving RD • effort required for the accurate description of RD • Respondents have already experienced data loss Data loss • Related to processed RD • Most regard reuse as relevant (reproducibility) Sharing & Reuse • Sometimes data „used up“; dependent on discipline Research data- • Different (discipline-specific) cultures Policy • Some fear over-regulation • Awareness-raising measures, one-stop shop RDM as a service • Need for advice; information & technical services 11

  12. Recom m endations Based on Our Findings 1 . Developing a RDM-Policy : awarness, research cultures; optional implementation at department level 2 . Online m aterial at the university‘s w ebsite summarizing relevent information 3 . Single point of contact : providing information on RDM-services, referring to other sources etc… 12

  13. Developing a RDM-Policy for WU Several Im portant Aspects Organisational and content- related issues Ownership of data • Single policy for the entire DMP university or framework with not considered strictly optional customization at the or only Responsibilities, duties regulated recommending academic department character Handling research data • Recommending or more Other subjects… regulating character Basic orientation w hen developing a first draft • Based on state-of-the-art examples • Taking into account empirical findings and the research cultures at WU • Middle ground between directive specifications and non-binding recommendations • The draft defines an ethical standard in dealing with research data and is therefore deliberately designed as a policy and not as guideline 13

  14. Selected Literature Methodology  Bogner A., Menz W (2009): The Theory-Generating Expert Interview. Epistemological Interest, Forms of Knowledge, Interaction. In: A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz (eds.): Interviewing Experts . London [ UK] , Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43–80.  Meuser M., Nagel U. (2009): The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production. In: A. Bogner, B. Littig and W. Menz (eds.): Interviewing Experts . London [ UK] , Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–42.  Pickard J., Childs S (2013): Research methods in information . London, Facet.  Yin R. K. (2017): Case study research and applications - design and methods . London, SAGE. Conceptualising data  Kitchin, R. (2014): The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. Thousand Oaks [ CA] , SAGE. 14

  15. Thank you for your attention! Questions? 15

Recommend


More recommend