a sat based procedure for verifying finite state machines
play

A SAT-Based Procedure for Verifying Finite State Machines in ACL2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A SAT-Based Procedure for Verifying Finite State Machines in ACL2 Warren A. Hunt, Jr. and Erik Reeber {reeber,hunt}@cs.utexas.edu The University of Texas ACL2 Workshop, August 16 , 2006 Introduction The ACL2 theorem prover is great


  1. A SAT-Based Procedure for Verifying Finite State Machines in ACL2 Warren A. Hunt, Jr. and Erik Reeber {reeber,hunt}@cs.utexas.edu The University of Texas ACL2 Workshop, August 16 , 2006

  2. Introduction • The ACL2 theorem prover is great – Scalable to large industrial verification problems • But… – Proofs require a lot of human effort – Computer could do more • Especially when in decidable domains • Identify a decidable subclass of ALC2 properties – Based on tree structures • New ACL2 hint for proving properties in this domain – Available in a future version of ACL2 August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 2

  3. Presentation Overview • Focus is on what you can do with the new hint – If you want to know how it works • Read paper • Look at code: www.cs.utexas.edu/users/reeber • Outline – Demo – Performance Results – Hardware Verification Methodology – Application: TRIPS Processor Components – Future Work – Conclusion August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 3

  4. Demo August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 4

  5. Performance Results ACL2 Clausifier BDD Engine SAT Engine 275 225 175 Time(s) 125 75 25 4-bit Add Assoc 32-bit Add 200-bit Add 32x6 Shift-0 64x7 Shift-0 32x4 Add-Shift 64x6 Add-Shift 100 Digit Dec Assoc Assoc Inv -25 August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 5

  6. Lines of Code ACL2 Clausifier BDD Engine SAT Engine 350 300 250 200 # Lines 150 100 50 0 4-bit Add Assoc 32-bit Add 200-bit Add 32x6 Shift-0 64x7 Shift-0 32x4 Add-Shift 64x6 Add-Shift 100 Digit Dec Assoc Assoc Inv August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 6

  7. Hardware Verification Methodology Verilog English Spec, C Model and Design Test Suite Testing & Inspection Manual Compiler Translation DE2 ACL2 Spec Design Guided Verifying SAT-Based Proof Compiler Decision Procedure SULFA ACL2 Model Properties August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 7

  8. TRIPS LSQ • TRIPS Processor – Designed and built at University of Texas and IBM • Prototype next-generation processor – Multi-core, speculative, pipelined processor • 4 memory partitions, 16 ALUs • 256 speculative out-of-order instructions, partitioned into eight instruction blocks • Load Store Queue (LSQ) – Queue for speculative loads and stores not ready for cache – Four LSQ tiles, one for each memory partition • Verified LSQ internal communication protocol August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 8

  9. Exception Mask Protocol Flush_mask Exception_mask • Exception can occur at each tile Tile 0 UDT_EX_Mask • Each tile stores a Flush_mask T0_Except Local_Except DDT_EX_Mask mask of known REG exceptions Tile 1 UDT_EX_Mask Flush_mask • Mask sent up T1_Except Local_Except DDT_EX_Mask each cycle REG Tile 2 • Eventually every UDT_EX_Mask Flush_mask T2_Except exception is Local_Except DDT_EX_Mask known by Tile 0 REG Tile 3 UDT_EX_Mask • Global flushes Flush_mask T3_Except remove Local_Except DDT_EX_Mask exceptions August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 9

  10. Verification of Exception Protocol • Compiled Verilog design into DE2 • Compiled DE2 into ACL2 model – proven equivalence • Wrote single-tile exception model • Specification: – Safety. Tile 0 reports a subset of the exceptions reported by the single-tile model – Liveness. Eventually every exception produced by the single-tile model is reported by Tile 0 . August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 10

  11. Exception Protocol Safety Property • Tile 0 reports a subset of the exceptions reported by the single-tile model (defthm specification-miss-exception-safety (implies (and (integerp tao) (<= 0 tao) (Tth-valid-inputsp tao input-list)) (submaskp 8 (acl2v-udt_miss_ordering_exceptions *t0* (Tth-model-state tao input-list) (nth tao input-list)) (spec-miss-exceptions (Tth-spec-state tao input-list) (nth tao input-list))))) August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 11

  12. Safety Invariant Properties (defthm miss-order-inv-is-invariant-step (implies (and (inputs-goodp proof-st ins) (miss-order-inv proof-st)) (miss-order-inv (update-proof-state proof-st ins))) :hints (("Goal" :external (sat nil sat::$sat)))) (defthm miss-order-inv-implies-thm (implies (and (miss-order-inv proof-st) (inputs-goodp proof-st ins)) (submaskp 8 (acl2v-udt_miss_ordering_exceptions *t0* (proof-st-dsn-state proof-st) ins) (update-proof-st-0th-miss-mask *t0* proof-st ins))) :hints (("Goal" :external (sat nil sat::$sat)))) August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 12

  13. Liveness Property • Eventually every exception produced by the single- tile model is reported by Tile 0 • ACL2 Specification – Prove theorem below – Use defun-sk definition on next slide • Proof process same as before – Unable to prove invariant directly with SAT (defthm specification-miss-exception-liveness (implies (and (integerp tao) (<= 0 tao)) (eventually-1T-miss-subset-of-4T-P tao input-list)) August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 13

  14. Liveness Property Defun-sk (defun-sk eventually-1T-miss-subset-of-4T-P (tao input-list) (exists (tao-prime) (and (integerp tao-prime) (<= tao tao-prime) (implies (Tth-valid-inputsp tao-prime input-list) (submaskp 8 (spec-miss-exceptions (Tth-spec-state tao input-list) (nth tao input-list)) (bv-or 8 (recent-flushes tao tao-prime input-list) (acl2v-udt_miss_ordering_exceptions *t0* (Tth-model-state tao-prime input-list) (nth tao-prime input-list)))))))) August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 14

  15. Store Mask Protocol • Each tile produces a mask of arrived stores • Protocol more complex than exception protocol – Up to 256 entries in store mask – Store mask sent to both neighbors • Specification & verification methodology similar to exception protocol • Analysis – Problem size: ~1500 Boolean variables – 130 hours of human effort – Multi-hour proof • Improvement over pure theorem proving – Counter examples especially helpful August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 15

  16. Future Work • More applications – Full LSQ design – n-tile circuit generator • Performance improvements – Try the new BDD system • Expand SULFA – Constrained functions – Limited arithmetic • Add to ACL2 “waterfall” • Verify proof engine – Theoretical issues: function body, proof of termination – Practical issues: complex code, large clause inputs • Counter-example guided refinement August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 16

  17. Conclusion • Defined decidable subclass of ACL2 formulas – Includes primitives if, cons, car, cdr, consp, and equal – Can be extended with user-defined functions • New hint for proving properties in this subclass – Fully automatic – Generates counter-examples to invalid properties • Applying to TRIPS processor – Multi-core, pipelined, out-of-order processor – Combining SAT-based reasoning with pure theorem proving – Solid improvement over pure theorem proving August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 17

  18. Backup Slides August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 18

  19. Single-Tile Exception Model • Wrote a single-tile model in ACL2 • The full mask of exceptions is generated each cycle Spec_EX_mask Flush_mask 8 NOT T0_Except 4 8 EN-DECODE R T1_Except * 8 A 4 8 E EN-DECODE N O G T2_Except * D 4 8 R EN-DECODE T3_Except * 4 8 EN-DECODE * This input has been modified: an exception is disabled if it occurs in an instruction that has already been flushed. August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 19

  20. Single-Tile Exception Model • Wrote a single-tile model in ACL2 • The full mask of exceptions is generated each cycle Spec_EX_mask Flush_mask 8 NOT T0_Except 4 8 EN-DECODE R T1_Except * 8 A 4 8 E EN-DECODE N O G T2_Except * D 4 8 R EN-DECODE T3_Except * 4 8 EN-DECODE * This input has been modified: an exception is disabled if it occurs in an instruction that has already been flushed. August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 20

  21. Store Mask Protocol Flush_mask Commit_mask • Each tile keeps a mask Tile 0… of arrived stores REG • Used in completion detection & deferred load Tile 1 UDT2_in UDT1_in UDT0_in UDT2_out UDT1_out UDT0_out awakening Flush_mask • Up to three stores are Commit_mask sent both upward and Store_mask downward at the Local_store DDT2_out DDT1_out DDT0_out DDT2_in DDT1_in DDT0_in beginning of each cycle • Eventually all arrived stores reach every tile REG • A flush or a commit removes stores Tile 2… August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 21

  22. Single-Tile Store Model • Similar to single-tile exception mask Flush_mask Store_mask 256 NOR Expand Mask Commit_mask 256 256 T0_Store 9 EN-DECODE R T1_Store * 8 A 9 E EN-DECODE O N G T2_Store * R D 9 EN-DECODE T3_Store * 9 EN-DECODE * This input has been modified: an exception is disabled if it occurs in an instruction that has already been flushed. August 16, 2006 ACL2 2006 22

Recommend


More recommend