70 mil illion annually
play

$70 Mil illion Annually Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HUD Continuum of Care Funding $70 Mil illion Annually Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) Recommendations Chicago System & HUD CoC Funding CHICAGO HOUSING INVENTORY FUNDING SOURCE 48% 52% HUD CoC Non-HUD CoC Funded Funded


  1. HUD Continuum of Care Funding $70 Mil illion Annually Pri riority Li Listing (R (Ranking) ) Recommendations

  2. Chicago System & HUD CoC Funding CHICAGO HOUSING INVENTORY FUNDING SOURCE 48% 52% HUD CoC Non-HUD CoC Funded Funded Projects Projects

  3. The Chicago CoC FY2019 GIW Inventory Breakdown [by component type] RRH PSH SH Program # of Projects Model % (149) Types PSH 115 77% TH 18 12% TH RRH 4 3% CE-SSO 5 3% SH 3 2% CES-SSO TH-RRH 2 1% HMIS Non- CE-SSO 1 1% Joint TH & PH-RRH HMIS 1 1% Non CES-SSO

  4. 2019 System Goals • Reduce the number of persons who are homeless and are in the homeless system (One List), overall and for identified subpopulations. • Subpopulations: chronic homeless, street homeless, families, youth, veterans. • Reduce the time persons remain homeless. • Homeless dedicated units should all be filled utilizing the coordinated entry system (CES). • Increase the earned income and/or other income of adults served in the homeless services system. • Increase persons who exit street homelessness to enter sheltered destination (ES, SH, TH, PH)

  5. CoC Funding Advancing Local Priorities to Align with HUD Priorities Local Priorities HUD Program Type Chronic & Street Homelessness Permanent Housing Families Temporary & Permanent Housing Youth Temporary & Permanent Housing Veterans Temporary & Permanent Housing Domestic Violence Temporary & Permanent Housing Coordinated Response System Coordinated Entry Data-Driven Decision Making HMIS

  6. CoC Board’s Role to Prepare for CoC Funding • Approve system goals that guide prioritization • Board is final stop on any appeals • Approve formal prioritization policy to guide ranking of projects

  7. Considerations & Rationale • Prioritize Rapid Rehousing (RRH) projects (RRH and Joint Transitional Housing-Rapid Rehousing) for both renewals and new projects – Pipeline Expansion • Significant changes in the 2019 Local Evaluation Instrument process – SPEC; Evaluation Tool Subcommittee • Implementation of Monitoring and Technical Assistance (TA) protocols – Performance/Data/Research; Monitoring Workgroup • Focus on priority populations – Coordinated Entry

  8. 2019 Ranking Policy Recommendation 1. System-level Projects 2. Renewal Projects a. RRH/Joint TH-RRH b. PSH c. Safe Havens d. TH e. SSO 3. New Projects 1. RRH/Joint TH-RRH 2. PSH

  9. Project Prioritization Work Group Members Fred Friedman – LEC Rosemary Mendez – Thresholds Gwendolyn Turner – LEC Ann Bihrle – Mercy Housing Chris O’Hara – LEC Millicent Ntiamoah – Catholic Charities Renita White – At-large Shannon Stewart – Inspiration Khen Nickle – At-large Corporation Adriana Camarda - DFSS Emily Metz – Urban Labs Jackie Lorens Harris – Chicago Lights

  10. Thank You & Questio ions

Recommend


More recommend