+ 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) in Oklahoma * and some NHD! Claire DeVaughan USGS National Geospatial Program National Map Liaison for Oklahoma and Texas April 7, 2017
+ 2 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Applies ground- breaking lidar technology to acquire and distribute 3D data Addresses a broad range of critical applications of national ■ 3D data include surface elevations significance and natural and constructed features ■ 3DEP increases the quality level of lidar being acquired to enable more accurate understanding, modeling, and prediction ■ Goal to acquire national coverage in 8 years
+ 3 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Mission Critical Applications Archaeology Alternative Energy Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management Infrastructure Management Aviation Safety Precision Forestry Precision Forestry Geologic Hazards
+ 4 3DEP is a Partnership Program ■ National lidar coverage with ifsar in Alaska in 8 years ■ Address the mission-critical requirements of 34 Federal agencies, 50 states, and other organizations documented in the National Enhanced Elevation Assessment ■ Return on investment 5:1 ■ Leverage the capability and capacity of private industry mapping firms ■ Achieve a 25% cost efficiency gain by collecting data in larger projects ■ Completely refresh national elevation data holdings with new lidar and ifsar elevation data products and services Precision Farming Land Navigation Geologic Resources and Flood Risk Mitigation Natural Resource Infrastructure Hazards Mitigation Conservation Management and Safety
3D Elevation Program + + 5 5 Mission Critical Applications Annual Benefits Conservative Potential Rank Business Use 1 Flood Risk Management $295M $502M Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management 2 Infrastructure and Construction Management $206M $942M 3 Natural Resources Conservation $159M $335M 4 Agriculture and Precision Farming $122M $2,011M 5 Water Supply and Quality $85M $156M 6 Wildfire Management, Planning and Response $76M $159M Geologic Resource Assessment and Hazard 7 $52M $1,067M Mitigation 8 Forest Resources Management $44M $62M 9 River and Stream Resource Management $38M $87M Infrastructure 10 Aviation Navigation and Safety $35M $56M : 20 Land Navigation and Safety $0.2M $7,125M Total for all Business Uses (1 – 27) $1.2B $13B Geologic Hazards NEEA Refresh is underway in partnership with NOAA Improve documentation of requirements and benefits based on what users know and need today Plan for next cycle after national coverage is achieved – what repeat rate and QLs are needed? Aviation Safety
FY17 3DEP Partnerships + 6
+ 7 Quality Level Quality Source Vertical Nominal Nominal Pulse DEM Post Level Accuracy Pulse Density (NPD) Spacing RMSEz Spacing (NPS) QL1 Lidar 10 cm 0.35 m 8 points/sq 0.5 meter meter QL2 Lidar 10 cm 0.7 m 2 points/sq 1 meter meter QL3 Lidar 20 cm 1.4 m 0.5 points/sq 2 meter meter QL4 Imagery 139 cm N/A N/A 5 meters QL5 Ifsar 185 cm N/A N/A 5 meters
+ Meers Fault in southwest Oklahoma 8 1-meter DEM from 2015 Quality Level 2 lidar
Where has lidar data been collected? + + 9 9 U.S. Interagency Elevation Inventory (USIEI) Interagency Collaboration USGS leads the topographic component by leveraging on-the- landscape knowledge of the USGS National Map liaison network NOAA (Bathy-Lead), FEMA, USACE, USFS, NRCS, NPS Improves understanding of the nation’s lidar landscape Active updates are critical to assessing progress toward 3DEP goals www.coast.noaa.gov/inventory
Spring 2017 Status + + 10 10
+ + 11 11 Where do people want to collect data? Analysis Tool: Interagency Areas of Interest – Seasketch Seasketch - http://seasket.ch/hwpR3E-MxO
3DEP + 12 READY for a national, 8-year program ■ Published plan for action based on extensive stakeholder input ■ Issued the first Broad Agency Announcement in 2014/15, in partnership with FEMA and NRCS; second round in 2015/16, third round in progress ■ USGS Contracting vehicle (GPSC3) has 5 meter Alaska DEMs Alaska Ifsar ORIs been established to address increased data volume nationwide ■ Revised the base lidar specification to include 3DEP quality levels, V 1.3 of spec is in Alaska Ifsar DSMs 1 meter DEMs progress ■ New products and services being made available from The National Map Lidar Point Cloud
+ 13 3DEP is a Partnership Program Maximize Project Benefits and Minimize Project Risks ■ Reduced unit costs through pooled funding with other partners, and economy of scale that 3DEP provides ■ Access to qualified and experienced firms under contract that acquire and process aerial lidar data ■ USGS programmatic infrastructure that issues and manages data acquisition contracts, and inspects, accepts, and distributes point cloud and derived data products ■ The opportunity to “buy up” higher-quality data for demanding applications that are not satisfied by standard 3DEP data ■ The opportunity to receive funding and acquire data on behalf of 3DEP
+ 14 FY17 Broad Agency Announcement Status (03/01/17) ■ Summary of proposals ■ 41 proposals in 25 states ■ Total value of $36.2 M: offering $22.5M and seeking $13.7 M from 3DEP ■ ~155,000 sq. mi. ■ Awards to date ■ 33 Projects in 25 States ■ Total Value $29M ■ Federal $17.2M: USGS $7.6M NRCS $6.7M FEMA $1M Other Feds $1.9 ■ Non-Federal $11.8M ■ ~125,000 sq. mi. ■ Reaching new partners – 20 new and 13 repeat partners ■ Additional Federal investments - $25.7M and ~121,000 sq. mi
+ Timeline FY18 Broad Agency Announcement Public Webinars Generate JFA and IA, GPSC Task Orders, Issue Awards 15 Issue Cooperative Agreements
+ + 16 16 3DEP FY16 BAA / FY17 Awards BAA Solicitation IV. Eligibility Information B. Cost Share, Minimum non-Federal Match for Cooperative Agreements, Project Scope The implementation model for 3DEP is based on multi-agency partnership funding for acquisition. Applicants must commit to a cost share for their project to be considered for funding. Cost share (funds contributed by applicant) is an evaluation factor against which proposals are rated. The greater the applicant’s cost share, the greater the score for this factor. In 2016, the average BAA award covered 38% of the total project cost, resulting in an average cost share of 62% by award recipients. Project awards ranged from $8,388 to $797,472, with an average award of $330,261.
+ + 17 17 3DEP FY16 BAA / FY17 Awards VI. Proposal Review Information A. Criteria 1. Project Location Areas with no lidar coverage Existing data Data more than 8 years old QL 3, 4, 5 Significant changes to the landscape have occurred 2. Areal Extent 3DEP Prefers project between 1500 and 5000 square miles Preference given to larger projects Projects outside of this range considered To fill in gaps in coverage For projects that represent significant cost share by the applicant
+ + 18 18 3DEP FY16 BAA /FY17 Awards VI. Proposal Review Information A. Criteria 3. Geographic Overlap with areas BAA represented on Attachment B: Attachment B: 3DEP FY17 Federal 3DEP Combined Areas of Interest Federal Areas of Interest General preference Attachment C: Agency Specific FY16 High Priority Areas for Data Acquisition Additional Consideration by individual agencies BAA Attachment C: 3DEP Funding Partners FY17 High Priority Areas for Lidar Data Acquisition (FEMA, NRCS)
+ + 19 19 3DEP FY16 BAA /FY17 Awards VI. Proposal Review Information A. Criteria 4.Project Cost and Cost Share (funds contributed by applicant) 5. Maturity of Applicant’s Proposal and maturity of designated funding sources 6.Technical Approach Projects making use of the GPSC as the acquisition mechanism receive full score for technical approach Applicants proposing to mange their own contract will be evaluated on the applicant’s approach to data acquisition and required project deliverables 7. Past Performance
+ + 20 20 3DEP Funding FY16 FY17 USGS Base budget from prior Preliminary year (includes acquisition and $20.4 M $24.7M operations) Estimated USGS Increase (FY16 enacted, FY17 $4.3 M $4.9 M Program Budget proposed President’s budget) $24.7 M $29.6 M Total USGS 3DEP budget FY16 Enacted (14 Year Scenario) FY16 Enacted Budget FY17 President’s FY17 President’s Budget Increase Budget Gap in annual USGS (13 Year Scenario) program budget to meet 8-year program (includes operations and 1/3 of total data 3DEP Call to acquisition funding Action Goal needed) (8 Year Scenario)
+ + 21 21 3DEP National Multiyear Plan Background 3DEP Executive Forum tasked the 3DEP Working Group to develop plan to: Move from this… Move from an annual, opportunistic process to a unified multi-year plan Move from patchwork irregular acquisition footprints to a defined planning and delivery unit Implement a phased approach beginning in FY18 Benefits Facilitate greater investments and leveraging through longer planning lead times Defined units facilitate planning and …to something more like this understanding costs, allow for improved reporting and justification of investments Presents a plan for nationwide coverage
Recommend
More recommend
