2019 School hool R Repor port Ca Cards ds a and d District ct A Acad ademic c Goa oals BOARD OF EDUCATION PRESENTATION OCTOBER 21, 2019
Purpos ose Our purpose is: • To provide an overview of the School Report Card highlighting the changes • Present the District and School Report Cards to the Board • Provide an overview of District Goal 1 • Describe how buildings use the data and the Illinois Quality Framework for school improvement planning. Board Policies – 2:20, 6:15, 6:340 2
Previ viou ous Rating M Method ods Before ESSA, accountability was based only on proficiency. Elementary English Language Arts Elementary Math 52.2% 56.3% 55.2% 59.3% 100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 60% 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 Level 5 Level 5 7.1% 9.0% 14.6% 14.7% Level 4 Level 4 45.1% 47.3% 40.6% 44.6% Level 3 Level 3 25.5% 23.3% 23.5% 21.0% Level 2 Level 2 13.6% 12.5% 14.4% 13.9% Level 1 8.7% 7.8% Level 1 6.9% 5.8% 3
Previ viou ous Rating M Method ods Before ESSA, accountability was based only on proficiency. Middle School English Language Arts Middle School Math 57.4% 59.9% 53.6% 53.7% 100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 60% 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% 17-18 18-19 17-18 18-19 Level 5 14.4% 15.0% Level 5 14.2% 14.6% Level 4 43.0% 44.9% Level 4 39.4% 39.1% Level 3 25.5% 23.6% Level 3 24.6% 23.9% Level 2 11.2% 10.8% Level 2 15.6% 15.0% Level 1 5.9% 5.8% Level 1 6.2% 7.4% 4
Changes Chan es From om L Las ast Y Year ear Changes for the 18-19 report card: • Proficiency results from the Illinois Science Assessment (ISA) are included. • Student participation rates for the 5Essentials survey are included. • Students are reported by home school rather than serving school. • The IEP student group has been replaced with a Children With Disabilities (CWD) group. This group includes students with an IEP and students with a 504 plan. • The points for high school College and Career Readiness indicator have been distributed to the other indicators until it becomes effective for the 20-21 school year. 5
Mul ultiple M Mea easures School designations are now based on multiple indicators. Math Proficiency 7.5% Elementary/Middle School Indicators 7.5% ELA Proficiency 7.5% Math Proficiency 75% Chronic 5 % Science Proficiency Absenteeism Academic 20% 5% EL Progress 25% ELA Growth Math Growth 25% 25% Math Growth 25% 20% Chronic Absenteeism ELA Growth School Quality/ 5% Climate Survey 25% Student Success 6
Mul ultiple M Mea easures School designations are now based on multiple indicators. High School Indicators 7.5% ELA Proficiency 7.5% Math Proficiency 75% 5 % Science Proficiency Academic 5% EL Progress Chronic Absenteeism 50% Graduation Rate 10% 8.33% 9 th Grade On-Track Composite 25% Graduation Rate 10% Chronic Absenteeism School Quality/ 50% Student Success 6.67% Climate Survey 7
New S School hool Design gnation ons Determining each school’s summative designation happens in three steps: Compare against Use ISBE Calculate state-wide determined Indicator Scores results to weightings to for each determine calculate school measure Summative Index Score Designation 8
Ind ndex S Scor ores es The final Index Score is calculated using the weights for each indicator. Indicator Score Weight Earned Points Math Proficiency 7.5% ELA Proficiency 84 7.5% 6.3 Math Proficiency 92 7.5% 6.9 Chronic Science Proficiency 72 5% 3.6 Absenteeism 20% ELA Growth 86 25% 21.5 Math Growth 84 25% 21 Math Growth 25% EL Progress 74 5% 3.7 Chronic Absenteeism 75 20% 15 ELA Growth Climate Survey 94 5% 4.7 25% School Index Score 82.7 9
Ind ndex S Scor ores es This process is repeated to create an Index Score for each student group. All Asian Black Hispanic White CWD English Learners Low Income Index Score 82.7 85.7 81.2 82.4 83.1 68.4 72.8 76.4 10
Establishing D Design gnation ons All schools in the state are then ranked by the overall Index Score to find the top 10% and the bottom 5%. School A 93.2 School B 92.1 Top 10% The lowest score for the top 10% sets the School C 90.4 School D 88.2 cut score for an Exemplary designation. School E 85.9 School F 81.7 School G 78.6 School H 71.2 School I 68.5 These cut scores will change from one School J 64.5 year to the next. We will not know until School K 52.1 School L 48.3 they are announced by ISBE. School M 47.8 School N 41.5 School O 38.7 School P 35.6 The highest score for the bottom 5% sets the School Q 33.2 School R 31.4 Bottom 5% cut score for a Lowest Performing designation. School S 28.7 11
New S School hool Design gnation ons Each school will receive one of the following summative designations: Schools performing in the top 10 percent of School A 93.2 Exemplary schools statewide, with no underperforming School B 92.1 Top 10% School C 90.4 student groups . School D 88.2 School E 85.9 A school that has no underperforming student School F 81.7 Commendable groups and whose performance is not in the top School G 78.6 School H 71.2 10 percent of schools statewide. School I 68.5 School J 64.5 A school in which one or more student groups is School K 52.1 performing at or below the level of the “all School L 48.3 Underperforming School M 47.8 students” group in the lowest performing (Targeted Support) School N 41.5 5 percent of schools . School O 38.7 School P 35.6 A school that is in the lowest-performing 5 percent School Q 33.2 Lowest School R 31.4 Bottom 5% of schools in Illinois and any high school with a Performing School S 28.7 graduation rate of 67 percent or less . (Comprehensive Support) 12
New S School hool Design gnation ons IPSD 2019 Tentative School Designations 25 20 20 Number of Schools 15 11 10 5 0 0 0 Exemplary Commendable Under Performing Lowest Performing 13
Com Coming Chan g Changes es ISBE is considering an amendment to the state ESSA accountability plan that could include the following: • Add growth as an indicator at the high school level • Remove chronic absenteeism as an indicator • Change the name and number of summative designation categories The State Superintendent is also planning to undergo an evaluation of the state’s assessment systems. 14
Distri rict G Goals District Goal 1: Help all students grow socially, emotionally, and academically. By the end of the 2019-2020 school year, • the average Aimsweb student growth percentile in reading and math will be greater than the 60th percentile. • the district-wide average SAT score will be a composite score of 1180. • the percentage of seniors with a post-secondary experience (AP/dual credit) will be at least 92% with increased participation in each student group. • the percentage of students receiving out of school suspensions will be at or below 1.0%. 15
Distri rict G Goals The average Aimsweb student growth percentile in reading and math will be greater than the 60 th percentile. Average Aimsweb Student Growth Percentile Fall 2018 to Spring 2019 60 District Goal 58 When student growth Average Student Growth Percentile 56 percentiles are above 50, our students are outpacing their national peers. National Average 50 40 Reading Math 16
Distri rict G Goals Our students demonstrate increasing achievement levels relative to their national peers. Reading - Four Year Aimsweb Cohort Math - Four Year Aimsweb Cohort 100 100 90 90 80 80 Average National Percentile Average National Percentile 75 73 71 70 70 70 65 63 63 60 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 17
Distri rict G Goals Our students demonstrate increasing achievement levels relative to their national peers. Reading - Four Year Aimsweb Cohort Math - Four Year Aimsweb Cohort 100 100 90 90 77 76 80 76 80 76 Average National Percentile Average National Percentile 75 74 72 71 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 5th 6th 7th 8th 5th 6th 7th 8th 18
Distri rict G Goals We see similar growth results for the PARCC/IAR assessment. IAR Student Growth Percentiles IAR Student Growth Percentiles Elementary Schools Middle Schools 59.1 60 60 Average Student Growth Percentile Average Student Growth Percentile 55.4 55.4 55.3 50 50 40 40 ELA Math ELA Math 19
Distri rict G Goals The district-wide average SAT score will be a composite score of 1180. 2019 School Day SAT 1600 1400 1148 1200 Average Score 995 1000 800 582 566 600 498 497 400 200 IPSD 204 Illinois Composite EBRW Math 20
Distri rict G Goals 2019 Average Junior Year SAT Total Score 1600 1400 1287 1178 1171 1148 1148 1200 998 College Board 976 959 Benchmark (1010) 1000 995 860 800 600 400 All Students Non Low Income Non IEP IEP Asian Black/African Hispanic/ White Low Income American Latino IPSD Illinois 21
Distri rict G Goals The percentage of seniors with a post-secondary experience (AP/dual credit) will be at least 92% with increased participation in each student group. Post Secondary Experiences by Type 100% 16.5% 80% 12.4% Percent of Graduating Class 92.2% 25.6% 60% 31.9% 87.1 % 40% 50.1% 42.0% 20% 0% Class of 18 Class of 19 Both AP and DC AP only DC only None 22
Recommend
More recommend
