2006
play

2006 NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL Canadian Financial Services Conference - PDF document

2006 NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL Canadian Financial Services Conference TIM CRANE Executive Vice-President, Chicagoland Banking CHUCK TONGE Vice Chairman, Harris N.A. March 29 06 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING


  1. 2006 NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL Canadian Financial Services Conference TIM CRANE Executive Vice-President, Chicagoland Banking CHUCK TONGE Vice Chairman, Harris N.A. March 29 • 06 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Bank of Montreal’s public communications often include written or oral forward-looking statements. Statements of this type are included in this presentation, and may be included in other filings with Canadian securities regulators or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or in other communications. All such statements are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and of any applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, comments with respect to our objectives and priorities for 2006 and beyond, our strategies or future actions, our targets, expectations for our financial condition or share price, and the results of or outlook for our operations or for the Canadian and U.S. economies. By their nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. There is significant risk that predictions, forecasts, conclusions or projections will not prove to be accurate, that our assumptions may not be correct and that actual results may differ materially from such predictions,forecasts, conclusions or projections. We caution readers of this presentation not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements as a number of factors could cause actual future results, conditions, actions or events to differ materially from the targets, expectations, estimates or intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements. The future outcomes that relate to forward-looking statements may be influenced by many factors, including but not limited to: general economic conditions in the countries in which we operate; currency value fluctuations; changes in monetary policy; the degree of competition in the geographic and business areas in which we operate; changes in laws; judicial or regulatory proceedings; the accuracy and completeness of the information we obtain with respect to our customers and counterparties; our ability to execute our strategic plans and to complete and integrate acquisitions; critical accounting estimates; operational and infrastructure risks; general political conditions; global capital market activities; the possible effects on our business of war or terrorist activities; disease or illness that affects local, national or international economies; disruptions to public infrastructure, such as transportation, communications, power or water supply; and technological changes. We caution that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all possible factors. Other factors could adversely affect our results. For more information, please see the discussion in our 2005 Annual Report concerning the effect certain key factors could have on actual results. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to Bank of Montreal, investors and others should carefully consider these factors, as well as other uncertainties and potential events, and the inherent uncertainty of forward looking statements. Bank of Montreal does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by the organization or on its behalf. Assumptions about the performance of the Canadian and U.S. economies in 2006 and how that will affect our businesses are material factors we consider when setting our strategic priorities and objectives, and in determining our financial targets, including provision for credit losses. Key assumptions include our assumption that the Canadian and U.S. economies will expand at a healthy pace in 2006 and that inflation will remain low. We also have assumed that interest rates will increase gradually in both countries in 2006 and that the Canadian dollar will hold onto its recent gains in value. In determining our expectations for economic growth, both broadly and in the financial services sector, we primarily consider historical economic data provided by the Canadian and U.S. governments and their agencies. Tax laws in the countries in which we operate, primarily Canada and the United States, are material factors we consider when determining our sustainable effective tax rate . 2 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6

  2. 2006 NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL NATIONAL BANK FINANCIAL Canadian Financial Services Conference Canadian Financial Services Conference TIM CRANE Executive Vice President, Chicagoland Banking March 29 • 06 2006 PRIORITIES Achieve financial targets with a particular focus on revenue growth to improve productivity Drive revenue growth by providing a superior client experience and earning a larger share of customers’ business Continue to improve U.S. performance Accelerate growth in the United States both organically and through acquisitions Grow net income in Canada through operational efficiency and improved market share, accelerating our growth in commercial banking and wealth management Build a high-performance organization by developing our people, living our values and being an employer of choice Maintain our world-class foundation of leading governance, sound risk management, productive systems and excellent after sales service 4 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6

  3. P&C CHICAGOLAND BANKING STRATEGY, ASPIRATION AND PRIORITIES � Our differentiated strategy is to leverage strong community leaders focused on growing deep customer relationships through exceptional service and offering a complete range of products and services through an expanding distribution network � Our aspiration is to be the leading Midwest retail and commercial bank � Our priorities are: � Improving organic growth � Expanding our retail footprint in the Midwest through de novo growth and acquisitions 5 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6 OVERVIEW OF THE U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY � Large, growing, diverse and fragmented market with almost Top 5 MSA Profile 9,000 banking institutions and thrifts Per Capita Personal � U.S. and Canadian markets have Population Population (MM)* Growth(%)** Income significant differences in customer ($M)*** preferences and market structure New York 18.7 10.8 41 � Payment processing models Los Angeles 12.9 8.4 33 � Adoption of electronic channels Chicago 9.4 12.7 35 Philadelphia 5.8 12.6 37 � Regulatory requirements (e.g., Community reinvestment act, Dallas 5.7 29.3 34 Anti-money laundering) Population as of July 2004 * Population growth rate 1990-2000 � Customer buying behaviour and ** Per capita income in 2003 *** share of wallet Source: SNL database, FDIC, US census 6 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6

  4. CHICAGO AREA OVERVIEW An attractive, growing, fragmented and competitive retail banking market � Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) key demographic Top 5 MSA Profile indicators: � Population growth in the second Branches/ Deposit share # # of Bank quartile of all U.S. MSAs 100,000 of top 5 Banks branches people competitors* � Median household income in the first quartile of all U.S. MSAs New York 233 5,236 28 57% Los Angeles 160 2,227 17 53% � Banking statistics: Chicago 309 2,989 32 45% � Almost 3,000 branches in MSA Philadelphia 156 1,893 33 54% � Top 5 bank deposit market share significantly lags other major MSAs; Dallas 176 1,493 26 67% increasing market fragmentation � 14 new banking charters granted and * Unadjusted in-market deposits as of 6/30/05 over 561 new branches opened in Source: SNL database, FDIC last 3 years (highest MSA branch growth rate in the U.S.) 7 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6 CHICAGO MSA MARKET SHARE INFORMATION Retail and small business adjusted deposit market share Number of 2000 2005 1 Year 5 Year Deposits per Branches share share Growth Growth Branch ($MM) (%) (%) (%) (%) 2005 Chase 287 10.6 10.5 1.9 37.7 61.3 Harris* 172 8.1 8.5 0.4 45.5 83.1 LaSalle 140 10.1 7.6 3.2 4.9 91.4 Fifth Third 103 4.8 4.3 13.5 27.4 70.9 Charter One 136 3.8 3.8 0.7 40.1 47.1 Top 5 Share (%) 37.4 34.7 Total Market Size (US$B) $120.3 $168.7 Total Market Growth (%) 8.4 7.7 7.7 40.3 * Harris branch count above excludes 19 Mercantile branches, 2 Villa Park branches and 6 net new branches opened post 6/30/05 Source: www.fdic.gov as at June 30, 2005. Market share data for 8 counties: Cook, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, Will. Data adjusted to remove large corporate/wholesale deposits on a Y/Y consistent basis. 8 I N V E S T O R C O N F E R E N C E · M A R C H 2 9 , 2 0 0 6

Recommend


More recommend