who we are
play

WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development (ACCD) National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) Western Sydney University Contracted by Independent Health Pricing Authority (IHPA) to develop and maintain the


  1. WHO WE ARE Australian Consortium for Classification Development (ACCD) National Centre for Classification in Health (NCCH) Western Sydney University Contracted by Independent Health Pricing Authority (IHPA) to develop and maintain the ICD-10-AM, ACHI, and ACS

  2. For more information: www.accd.net.au

  3. WHY VISUALISATION • Moving to the digital era • WHO’s ICD -10 and ICD-11 browser • CSIRO’s SHRIMP browser • ICD-10-AM, ACHI and ACS on screen for feedback • How should we visualise ICD-10-AM/ACHI/ACS?

  4. VISUALISATION REQUIREMENTS Our requirements: • User-friendly and intuitive • Easy to Navigate around • Able to illustrate multi-parent relationships

  5. TYPES OF VISUALISATION Tree View Tree View Diagram Force-Directed Graph

  6. TREE VIEW • Lower development efforts • Highly Compact • Clearly illustrates parent-child hierarchical relationships • Does not support multi-parent, by itself

  7. TREE VIEW DIAGRAM • Visually appealing • Illustrate multi-parent relationship • Requires a certain amount of space • Requires additional development effort

  8. Example created by Rob Schmuecker http://bl.ocks.org/robschmuecker/7880033

  9. Click Chapter 1 Focused on Chapter 1 and hidden unnecessary nodes

  10. Multiple parents Line crossing over other lines and nodes

  11. FORCE DIRECTED GRAPH • Visually appealing • Avoids lines overlapping • Illustrate multi-parent relationship • Requires a certain amount of space • Requires the most development effort

  12. SUMMARY Illustrates Visual Compactness Suitability for Multi-Parent Rating Rating Large Datasets Tree View No Low High High Tree View Yes High Medium High Diagram Force-Directed Yes High Medium High Graph

  13. SUMMARY Illustrates Visual Compactness Suitability for Multi-Parent Rating Rating Large Datasets Tree View No Low High High Tree View Yes High Medium High Diagram Force-Directed Yes High Medium High Graph

  14. CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATIONS • Visualisation Libraries (e.g. Chart.js, GoJs) • Efficient for simple visualisation requirements • Less flexibility • Visualisation Frameworks (e.g. D3.js, C3.js) • The “ground - up” approach • Requires more development efforts • Offers flexibility

  15. Presented by Western Sydney Michael Tran University

Recommend


More recommend