western states water council
play

Western States Water Council IDAHO WATER REUSE CONFERENCE Advisor - PDF document

5/10/2012 Western States Water Council IDAHO WATER REUSE CONFERENCE Advisor to 18 western APRIL 18, 2012 governors on water policy issues Provides collective Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council voice Fosters collaboration


  1. 5/10/2012 Western States Water Council IDAHO WATER REUSE CONFERENCE • Advisor to 18 western APRIL 18, 2012 governors on water policy issues • Provides collective Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council voice • Fosters collaboration Dan Adams • Formal affiliate of the The Langdon Group Western Governors’ Association (WGA) Reuse Regulation Downstream State Regulation Upstream California Utah • State laws and policies • Strict legal framework promote reuse • Reuse is relatively new • Long history with reuse • Mixed political • Political support for perspectives reuse • Low raw water supply • High raw water supply costs costs Factors Influencing Reuse Public Concerns Lack of understanding about water supply Drivers Barriers • Scarcity of water • Public opposition supplies • Water right protections • High raw water supply • Inconsistent state policy costs • Regulatory burdens • Public desire to • Project funding conserve • Treatment requirements 1

  2. 5/10/2012 Public Concerns Public Concerns Lack of understanding about water cycle Negative or confusing terminology Public Concerns Public Concerns The “Yuck” Factor Media influence “We expect [California’s] Recycled Water Task Force to offer a final report…that will contribute to dumping even more potentially hazardous contaminants into California’s drinking water.” ‐ Shaffer, R.; Robinson, R. Other View: “Toilet to Tap:” Let’s Not Get Hasty. Sacramento Bee, April 7, 2003 . State Reuse Efforts Factors influencing public acceptance 2009 Corvallis, OR Study • Recent Rulemaking/Legislation (ID, MT, WA) Influencing factors Credible Sources • State ‐ Initiated Reports (TX, UT, and others) • Sustainability • OR State Univ. (93%) • Component in State Water Plans (various) • Trust in the city • Other univ. scientists • State ‐ Led Reuse Taskforces (AZ, CA, OR, WA) (78%) • Prior knowledge of wastewater • OR. Dep’t of Health (77%) • Education • OR. DEQ (75%) • EPA (61%) 2

  3. 5/10/2012 Addressing public concerns Addressing public concerns Arizona Recommendations CA Recommendations • Create coalition with • State should take leadership role industry to create an • Community value ‐ based decision ‐ making “acceptable lexicon” • State ‐ hosted website • Comprehensive curricula for public schools with reuse information • Information program for the media • “Water Reuse Day” • Encourage academic program for universities • State ‐ hosted education workshops Addressing public concerns Addressing public concerns Oregon Recommendations Texas Recommendations • Develop “clear and “[I]t is extremely important that proactive public coherent” state policy outreach and awareness programs be • Regulatory process implemented on a local, regional, and statewide guidance basis.” • Remove stigmatizing ‐ Texas Water Dev. Bd., History of Water Reuse in Texas , 22 (Feb. 2011). language • Show benefits through education and outreach Addressing public concerns Common themes from State efforts • Refine terminology • States can take lead in encouraging reuse (where appropriate) • Clear and coherent state policies are essential • Improve access to information • Involve local stakeholders in all project phases • Proactive public and policy maker education 3

  4. 5/10/2012 The Old and The New The Old • NEPA requires public involvement • Hold an open house – “Tell the community what you • Transportation was the first to embrace public are going to do.” involvement as part of NEPA • Have some one ‐ on ‐ one • Municipal only embraced public involvement interaction in scattered areas around the country • Hold a bond election and • Today with tight dollars and failing hope for the best infrastructure, you now HAVE to do it • Go ask for a grant The Five The New • Engagement of Policy, Program and Public • Planning • Situational Assessment • Engineering • Engage the Silent Majority • Funding – Messaging and Brand Development – Online Open House • Environmental – Visual Voice • Public and Agency Engagement – One ‐ on ‐ one Stakeholder Facilitation – Informational Website Through Construction – Online video – Social Media Messaging & Branding Online Open House 4

  5. 5/10/2012 Visual Voice Project Websites Key Learning Points… • Trust • If you are going to do engagement (and you will have to), do it right! • Community Solution to a Community Problem • Education • Funding contact information DANIEL R. ADAMS dadams@langdongroupinc.com 801.886.9052 www.langdongroupinc.com 5

Recommend


More recommend