water quality standards regulation
play

Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Cadmium, Human Health Criteria Agenda: Roll Call Status of Selenium Criteria Summary & discussion of Issues, Opinions and Options: Bacteria


  1. Water Quality Standards Regulation (9 VAC 25-260) Rulemaking: Bacteria, Ammonia, Cadmium, Human Health Criteria

  2. Agenda: • Roll Call • Status of Selenium Criteria • Summary & discussion of Issues, Opinions and Options:  Bacteria Criteria  Ammonia Criteria  Cadmium Criteria  Human Health Criteria • Wrap up and future rulemaking actions

  3. Selenium Criteria: • Naturally occurring element in sedimentary rocks, shale, coal, phosphate deposits and soil • Essential micro-nutrient in small amounts; toxic impacts at higher concentrations • June 2016 – EPA issued revised water quality criterion for Selenium in freshwater • Reflects latest scientific knowledge • Aquatic life toxicity based primarily on consuming contaminated food rather than exposure to Se dissolved in water

  4. Recommended Selenium Criteria Short- Chronic Term Criterion Egg-Ovary Whole Body Muscle Water Lentic Water Lotic Water Version (mg/kg dw) (mg/kg dw) (mg/kg dw) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) Acute Equation 5 5 based on Current VA N/A N/A N/A (4-day) (4-day) water Criterion column conc. Intermittent 1.5 3.1 EPA 2016 15.1 8.5 11.3 exposure (30-day) (30-day) equation

  5. Selenium Criteria Recommendation: • With recent release, insufficient time to discuss with RAP • Still awaiting EPA’s implementation guidance; timing unknown  Address EPA’s new recommended Selenium criteria in next Triennial Review

  6. Bacteria Criteria Theoretical Illness Criteria Theoretical Illness EPA Rate (STV) Alternate EPA Rate (STV) Elements Recommendation 1 (36/1000 illness rate) Recommendation 2 (32/1000 illness rate) Statistical Statistical Indicator Geometric Mean Threshold Value Geometric Mean Threshold Value (freshwater) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) 10% exceedence 10% exceedence Current VA 126 235 Criterion E. coli EPA 2012 126 410 100 320 E. coli Statistical Statistical Indicator Geometric Mean Threshold Value Geometric Mean Threshold Value (marine water) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) (cfu/100 ml) 10% exceedence 10% exceedence Current VA 35 104 Criterion Enterococci EPA 2012 35 130 30 110 Enterococci

  7. Bacteria Criteria Issue Opinions Options • Recommend criteria based • Consider both illness on 36/1,000 illness rate; rates; EPA criteria Assumed illness rate consistent with current documentation states policy and existing TMDLs (36 or 32/1,000) both are protective and • Recommend more acceptable conservative lower rate • Include in Regulation • If not in Regulation, BEACH Action Value • EPA recommends not ( notification threshold provide reference to for grant-funded States ) including in Standards VDH authority • EPA recommendations • Define “Coastal Rec. applicable to “ Coastal Waters” and limit Geographic Recreation Waters” amendments to them • All State surface waters • Provide same level of application designated for primary protection to all State contact recreation waters

  8. Ammonia Criteria Issue Opinions Options • VAMWA’s report has representative order-of- • DEQ cost info provided magnitude estimates Capital and operating to DPB • DEQ analysis of # and • VAMWA engineer’s costs for compliance type of affected report dischargers • State can’t lobby for $ • Keep 5 year limit • VAMWA suggested • Limit to permit term • Allow for schedule beyond draft regulatory permit term, in accord amendments Compliance schedule • DEQ Draft “Strawman” with Federal requirements • “As soon as possible” revisions to WQ Stds • “As soon as practicable” Regulation section for ammonia

  9. “Strawman” Amendments for Ammonia Compliance Schedule • Compliance schedule not limited to permit term by Federal regulations; “as soon as possible” • State preference to match Federal requirement • Amend WQ Standards Reg now (eventually revise VDPES Permit Regulation also): • Specific to ammonia criteria implementation • Factors to consider on a case-by-case basis • Interim milestones and reporting requirements

  10. EPA’s Updated Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium Freshwater Acute Chronic Criterion ug/L at hardness 100 ug/L at hardness 100 Virginia (1984) 3.9 1.1 EPA (2001) 2.0 0.25 EPA (2016) 1.8 0.72

  11. Updated Criteria for Cadmium: with and without extra protection for rainbow trout Criterion Acute Chronic ug/L at hardness 100 ug/L at hardness 100 EPA (2016) ; criterion lowered to protect rainbow 1.8 0.72 trout EPA (2016) ; criterion NOT lowered to protect rainbow 2.7 0.72 trout (no change to chronic)

  12. EPA’s Updated Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium (Estuarine) Estuarine Criterion Acute (ug/L) Chronic (ug/L) Virginia 40 8.8 EPA 2016 33 7.9

  13. Cadmium Criteria Issue Opinions Options • If included, only apply more stringent concs. to listed trout waters • Include “R. Trout • Following past policy, Include F.W. criterion Absent” criteria propose only EPA calculated by DEQ for • Don’t include “R. Trout recommended “Trout Absent”? Absent” criteria criterion; provides add’l protection for non- tested species that may be more sensitive

  14. Human Health Criteria Issue Opinions Options • Either don’t apply RSC or use 80% only when data • Further consider the supports it 20% “Relative Source • Propose EPA’s criteria; matter Contribution” is • Accept that RSC is have gone through peer arbitrary established EPA policy review, public comment, and no add’l data will be developed by DEQ • Can’t adopt a range as • Exclude Benzene from a WQ Standard proposal until EPA Benzene criteria • Use drinking water provides specific criteria shown as a range • Propose stringent criteria MCL (5 ug/L) as a guide on basis of MCL

  15. Future rulemaking actions • Staff to consider all RAP input and develop proposed amendments for agency management • Target Dec. 2016 SWCB presentation to request approval to go to Public Comment stage; if approved, followed by: • Executive Review (no time limit) • Notification in Virginia Register • 60-day public comment period • Public Hearing(s) scheduled • Review/respond to comment, draft final proposal for SWCB Fall 2017 meeting

Recommend


More recommend