Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 12, 2018 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 12, 2018

State’s announcement February 7 Preliminary review Stage 1 facilities Water supply Costs Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 2 February 12, 2018

Proposed staged approach Stage 1 (6,000 cfs) – one tunnel, one intermediate forebay, two intakes, and one pumping station Stage 2 (9,000 cfs) – second tunnel, third intake, and second pumping station CA WaterFix to be funded by south-of-Delta State Water Project contractors and potential participating CVP contractors CA WaterFix Provides benefits to aquatic species in the Delta Reduces reverse flows caused by the existing south Delta pumps Diverts water further upstream away from sensitive habitats Improves conditions for native fish species Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 3 February 12, 2018

CEQA and Permitting for Staged Implementation Supplemental EIR Supplemental ESA and CESA Permitting No new water quality or aquatic issues anticipated No changes to impact determinations or mitigation requirements anticipated Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 4 February 12, 2018

Full Project – Staged Approach Intake 2 Intake 3 Sacramento Intake 5 Intake 5 Intermediate Forebay West West East Tunnel Tunnel Tunnel Stockton West East West Pumping Plant Pumping Plant Pumping Plant SWP Pump SWP Pumps Stage 1 CVP P Pump Pumps Stage 2 February 12, 2018 5 Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 5

Average Delivery Capability With & Without 9,000 cfs Facility 6 4.7 4 to 5.3 5 1.3 MAF SWP-CVP Capability (MAF) 4.7 1 { 5 3.5 2 to 3.9 3 4 3 2 1 0 Existing Conditions Future without Future with CA WaterFix CA WaterFix 1 California WaterFix EIR/EIS No Action Alternative, existing conditions with 2025 climate change impacts 2 2015 Delivery Capability Report Existing Conveyance High Outflow scenario 3 2015 Delivery Capability Report Existing Conveyance Low Outflow scenario 4 California WaterFix EIR/EIS Alternative 4A-H4, initial operating criteria lower range 5 California WaterFix EIR/EIS Alternative 4A-H3, initial operating criteria upper range Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 6 February 12, 2018

Summary of Changes with Stage 1 -- 6,000 cfs 1 6,000 cfs facility protects approximately 0.9 MAF Stage 1 – based on current information, SWP contractors will be the primary funder and will receive commensurate water supply benefit SWP deliveries are roughly unchanged between 9,000 cfs and 6,000 cfs (approximately 2.8 maf) (1) Preliminary modeling analysis based on 6,000 cfs north of Delta H3+ modeling criteria Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 7 February 12, 2018

Capital (2017 dollars) Stage 1 Full Project ITEM 6,000 cfs 9,000 cfs ($ Billions) ($ Billions) Capital – Conveyance Facility • Construction 6.3 10.4 • Contingency for construction (~36%) 2.3 3.7 • Program Mgt., Construction Mgt., Engineering 2.0 2.1 • Land acquisition (includes 20% contingency) 0.14 0.16 Subtotal $10.7 B $16.3 B Mitigation – Capital 0.38 0.40 Total (Capital & Mitigation) $11.1 B $16.7 B Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 8 February 12, 2018

Operations & Maintenance (2017 Dollars) Stage 1 Full Project 6,000 cfs 9,000 cfs ITEM ($ M/yr.) ($ M/yr.) Total $49.6 M/yr. $64.4 M/yr. Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 9 February 12, 2018

2017 Dollars (1) Stage 1 assumes that up to 1,000 cfs of capacity is available for CVP use. The cost range shown is from 0 to 1,000 cfs of CVP use. (2) Based on Metropolitan's 2017/18 Revenue Requirement of $1,574 M (3) Approximate based on Metropolitan's 2017/18 sales budget of 1.70 million acre-feet Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 10 February 12, 2018

2017 Dollars Marginal Cost • South Delta Pumps $588 /AF $613 /AF • Delivered/Treated $815 /AF $840 /AF Household Cost 1 $1.90 - $2.40 / month $1.90 / month (1) Household impact based on 6.2 million occupied residential households in MWD Service area, 70% residential / 30% industrial split. Stage 1 assumes that up to 1,000 cfs of capacity is available for CVP use. The cost range shown is from 0 to 1,000 cfs of CVP use. Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 11 February 12, 2018