W3C Standarzization: Blance between Reality and Vision W3C Asia10 November 2006 Toshihiko Yamakami Toshihiko.Yamakami@access-company.com ACCESS http://www.access-company.com/ ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.1/6
Outline • Background • Advantages of W3C • Industrial Views on W3C Struggles • W3C Position Next Decade ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.2/6
Backgrounds • Application Layer Standardization • MHS/MOTIS in CCITT/ISO/IEC (1987-1993) • XHTML Basic in W3C since 2000 • WML2.0 and RD/ETR Editors in WAP/OMA since 2000 ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.3/6
Advantages of W3C • Incomparable skills of Webs • Neutral International Leading Org. • Leading Visions for industries • Compact HTML Tech Note • XHTML Basic 1.0 ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.4/6
Industrial Views on W3C • Losing Battles • .NET and IE • Industrial value chains, process and semantics • Authoring tools? Internet Police? Web 2.0? • Struggles for Invisible Internet • Embedded constraints inherited gadgets • Too Genetic and Theoretical • Gap with “Interoperability” • Mobile: Too diverse to be placed in MWI ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.5/6
Next Decade • Reusable Components and Framework • Neutral Process • Registry, Rating, ... • Evolution Evangelist • Taking part in Invisible Internet Guardian • Standardization is difficult with broader installed bases and diverse future • Web 2.0 is a reflection of emerged diversity of the Web ACCESS Proprietary, (C) ACCESS 2006 W3C Standarzization:Blance betweenReality and Vision – p.6/6
Recommend
More recommend
