Understanding the diagnosis of hip problems: When to refer to the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

understanding the diagnosis of hip problems when to refer
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Understanding the diagnosis of hip problems: When to refer to the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding the diagnosis of hip problems: When to refer to the surgeon and when to hold on! Dirk Kokmeyer, PT, DPT, SCS, COMT Director of Rehabilitation and Performance Maine Medical Partners, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Portland, Maine


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Understanding the diagnosis of hip problems: When to refer to the surgeon and when to hold on!

Director of Rehabilitation and Performance

Maine Medical Partners, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Portland, Maine dkokmeyer@mmc.org

@DirkKokmeyer

Dirk Kokmeyer, PT, DPT, SCS, COMT

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Patient

  • Physical demands
  • Satisfaction
  • Expectation

The Evidence

  • Success of PT
  • Indication for surgery
  • Surgical success

Expertise/opinion

  • Pragmatism
  • Humility
  • Understanding

clinical pathways

EBM

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • HPI with Inventory of:
  • Red flags?
  • Pain
  • functional demands
  • physical demands (sport)
  • Clinical Exam
  • Prognosis
  • What I can do for you…
  • How long will it take?
  • How much satisfaction?
  • Treatment - success?

Formulating the hot vs. crazy matrix

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Physical Therapist Surgeon

Hip Pain Hip Stiffness Hip/LE Dysfunction

Patient Values Evidence Clinical Expertise Patient Values Evidence Clinical Expertise

Nerve Entrapment

FAI/Labral Tear

Chondral issues

  • Chondral Lesion
  • OA

Athletic Pubalgia Soft tissue disorders

  • Bursitis
  • Lat. trochanteric pain syndrome
  • Tendon -opathy/tears

Referred pain

  • Lumbar Spine
  • SIJ
  • Other
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Understanding the diagnosis/clinical pathway

Sports Perf/PT Sports Med PCP Surgeon

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Patient Expectation

Dunn, JSES, 2016 NEER AWARD Mohamad, J of Rheumatology, 2002 Nicholas, PTJ, 2011 Puendetura, JOSPT, 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Irritability Classification

High Moderate Low

High Pain (≥7/10) Consistent night or rest pain High disability/low function

  • n WOMAC, HHS, HOS

Pain prior to end ROM AROM less than PROM secondary to pain Moderate Pain (4-6/10) Intermittent night or rest pain Moderate disability/function

  • n WOMAC, HHS, HOS

Pain at end ROM AROM similar to PROM Low Pain (≤3/10) No resting or night pain Low disability/high function

  • n WOMAC, HHS, HOS

Minimal pain at end ROM with overpressure AROM same as PROM PROM, modalities, pain reduction, activity modification Referral sooner if no change in symptoms PROM, modalities, pain reduction, activity modification Referral in 4-8 weeks if no change in symptoms Functional activities, strengthening as tolerated, activity modification Referral in 6-8 weeks if surgical indications

Modified from:

  • Kelley, McClure and Leggin, JOSPT 2009
  • McClure, Michener, PTJ, 2015
slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Cancer
  • Fractures
  • AVN
  • Legg-Calve-Perthes

Disease

  • SCFE
  • Septic Arthritis
  • Inguinal Hernia
  • Appendicitis
  • Ovarian Cyst

Red Flags

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fractures

Kirby et al, MSK Imaging, 2010: 14% of hip fractures missed by radiographs Dominguez, Acad Emerg Med, 2005: 4.4% hip fractures missed

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 1/5 falls cause serious injury

(i.e. hip fracture)

  • 2x risk of falling after 1º fall
  • <50% tell MD about a fall
  • >300,000/year hospitalized

for hip fractures

  • women > men
  • $31 billion/year

Falls and fractures among the elderly

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Hemmerich, 2006
  • Hyodo, 2017
  • Andriacchi, 1980

Range of motion demands of the hip

Stairs ~40º Squatting 90-140º Don + Tying shoes 85-90º IR ~10º Putting on pants ~86º IR 13-15º Getting in/out tub 79-99º IR 15-17º

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Case example of gentleman referred with knee pain and hip OA

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Altman et al, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1991

Hip IR < 15º

Hip Flex < 115º Morning Stiffness >60 min

Age >50 yrs

Sensitivity 86%, Specificity 75%

HIP PAIN +

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Joint Space narrowing

Femoral/ Acetabular Osteophytes

Sensitivity 91%, Specificity 89%

Altman et al, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 1991 HIP PAIN +

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Physical Therapy:

Beumer et al, BJSM, 2016 SR with meta-analysis

  • Exercise therapy: good short-term

benefit with pain/WOMAC

  • Manual Therapy: No additional

benefit

Treatment options and efficacy

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pisters et al, Ostoearthritis and Cartilage, 2010

  • RCT of two exercise protocols

with 60 month follow-up

  • Long-term: reduced pain, fewer

TJAs, better WOMAC

  • Booster session a key element

Treatment options and efficacy

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Svege et al, Ann Rheum Dis, 2015

  • 41% survival rate at 6 year f/u

with exercise + education

  • symptom severity (lower

WOMAC) in patients undergoing THR

Treatment options and efficacy

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Surgery

Indications for Surgery (THA): Quintana, J of Clin Epidemiology, 2000

  • Surgery inappropriate if:
  • mild pain > mild - mod limitations
  • mod-severe pain < 50
  • mod-severe pain > 50, low limitations
  • Surgery uncertain if:
  • mild-mod pain - moderate limitations -

low to high surgical risk - failed “correct” conservative mgmt

  • mild-moderate pain - severe functional

limitation - failed conservative mgmt

  • High pain - low functional limitation
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Surgery

Indications for Surgery (THA): Gademan, BMC Musc Dis, 2016

  • Failed conservative management

WRT pain

  • Typically >50
  • Severe pain
  • WOMAC >60
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hold on!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Athletic Pubalgia

“sports hernia”

c/c: severe groin, lower abdominal or pubic region, induced by exertion. Definition: weakness of the posterior inguinal wall.

Involves injury to the (Meyer, ann of surg, 2008):

  • insertion of the distal R abdominus
  • conjoined tendon
  • external oblique aponeurosis
  • adductor tendon(s)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Diagnosis

Cluster of findings:

  • 1. Subjective complaint of

deep groin, abdominal, pubic pain

  • 2. Pain exacerbated with

sport specific movements: running, kicking, cutting. 3.TTP: pubic symphysis, conjoined tendon, int/ext

  • bliques, adductor

insertions 4.Pain with resisted hip adduction and/or hip flexion 5.Pain with resisted curl-up

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Athletic Pubalgia

algorithm to treatment Kachingwe and Grech, JOSPT, 2008

Indication for PT based on: RTP> 4 mo & + hx of “rip”

  • hx of “rip”

not high-performance athlete Surgery indicated if: + hx of “rip”, RTP< 4 mo

  • hx of “rip” & failed PT
slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Feely, AJSM, 2008

}1997-2006: 23,806 injuries }738 hip injuries

  • Hammoud, Arthroscopy, 2012 - 38

pro athletes

}32% (12/38) had AP surgery also

required FAI surgery

}39% (15/38) had complete

resolution of AP symptoms with FAI surgery alone

“The Sports Hip Triad”

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FAI and Labral Pathology

Burnett et al, JBJS, 2006

  • 21 months to dx labral pathology
  • average of 3.3 providers seen

before dx made

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FAI and Labral Pathology

Reiman et al, BJSM, 2013

Hx:

  • Clicking: 100% Sens, 79% Spec,

+LR 6.67, r=0.79 for labral tears

  • Anterior groin pain. (Sens

96-100%)

  • Lateral and posterior pain possible
  • FAI: anterior pinching with sitting

Special Tests: Thomas Test, FADDIR (and derivatives) =

  • High Sens, Low Spec
slide-30
SLIDE 30

SURVEY SAYS

Surgeon 1:

Skeletally immature Female:

  • PT. Emphasis on

soft tissue Young male:

  • short course of PT,

but not afraid to fix a big CAM lesion quickly. Young female:

  • PT with emphasis on

pelvic control + glute firing

  • No pain relief with

injection = return to PT >35 female

  • Maximize therapeutic

benefit!

  • Keep going if better!

Surgeon 2:

Skeletally immature:

  • If non-dysplastic,

will treat more aggressively with surgery if + MRI 18-30

  • Will treat more

aggressively with surgery and see sooner if PT

Surgeon 3:

“I don’t believe in paternalism; it’s up to the PT” + Scour/FADIR, failed conservative mgmt, pt is miserable = refer!

Surgeon 4:

Skeletally immature Female:

  • Maximize PT benefit
  • no bone work until

growth plate closed

  • PT x 12 weeks

Young male:

  • Will scope quickly

with radiographic evidence of FAI Young female:

  • PT x 8 weeks

>40 female

  • PT x 12 weeks

>40 male

  • Will take a referral

sooner

Surgeon 5:

Skeletally immature:

  • If limping with knee or

hip pain, refer quickly for imaging and MD eval (r/o SCFE).

  • If imaging neg. PT OK

Skeletally mature:

  • 6 week course of PT.

Referral OK if no improvement noted. 40+

  • “no rush”
  • Will do a CSI if no

improvement

  • Will see earlier with

increase tissue irritability

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Schmitz, AJSM, 2012 (42 asymptomatic participants)
  • Paralabral cysts in 20%
  • Labral tears in 80-85%

FAI and Labral Pathology

“We believe that it is beneficial and essential to consider

  • ther sources of pain besides the labrum itself”
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Labral tear 69% Chondral defect 24% Ligamentum teres tear 2.2% Labral/Paralabral cyst 13% Acetabular bone edema 11% Fibrocystic changes of the femoral head/neck junction 22% Rim fracture 11% Subchondral cysts 16% Osseus bump on the femoral neck 20%

Abnormalities in 73%

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Primarily in males
  • 14-25% males
  • 4-5% female
  • CAM deformity may

be a previous silent SCFE

  • 710/4,731 hips

FAI and Labral Pathology - CAM lesion

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conservative Management

Emara, JOS, 2011

  • 37 patients with mild FAI
  • alpha angle < 60º
  • 24 mo
  • HHS from 72 to 91
  • VAS from 6 - 2
  • 4/27 (11%) went on to surgery

Yazbek, JOST, 2011

  • case report 4 patients

Mansell, BMC MSK dis, 2016

  • RCT w/ 2 yr f/u (Protocol)

Griffin, BMJ, 2016

  • RCT w/ 12 mo

Wright, J sci med sport, 2017

  • PT vs. HEP
slide-35
SLIDE 35

My opinion on FAI

  • Rule out red flags and utilize clinical pathway for imaging without

hesitation.

  • If in the midst of a growth spurt, maximize PT benefit with

treatment of stabilization exercises, selective stretching, pelvic control in CKC activities

  • Refer if no improvements with PT or patient (family) is adamant in

seeing and ortho surgeon

  • Though young females can do well with surgery, the ones that go

bad, REALLY go bad.

  • Older females can do well with PT and activity modification
  • not afraid to non-responders because surgical outcome is good,

rehab is easy with this population (less complications)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Maine Medical Center

Maine Medical Partners Orthopedic and Sports Medicine