understanding real life patient benefits in taking part
play

Understanding real life patient benefits in taking part in dementia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sowerby Symposium Understanding real life patient benefits in taking part in dementia research Hilary Doxford September 2016 Join Dementia Research Champion Alzheimers Society Research Network Volunteer Today My background


  1. Sowerby Symposium Understanding ‘real life’ patient benefits in taking part in dementia research Hilary Doxford September 2016 Join Dementia Research Champion Alzheimer’s Society Research Network Volunteer

  2. Today • My background • My involvement • My frustrations • The benefits

  3. Who am I? • Work experience • Volunteer (primarily for the AS) • Diagnosis

  4. Some of my difficulties today • My brain is slowing down • Declining short term memory – barn fire • Minimal ‘working’ memory 1234 x 5678 • Background noise – hate it • Learning – I can’t • See things incorrectly – brain jumps to worst case scenario/potential threats • Following stories/TV plots – mission impossible!

  5. Cont. • Superstores, locating products/meal planning • Lateral thinking/cryptic thinking • Social situations, no conversation topics • Sense of smell - cannot name the source • Comprehension – missing jigsaw pieces • Stopped dreaming (or can’t recall them) • Losing my way on routes I should know • Mix up my words/typing /writing errors • Emotions – harder to control

  6. Initial thoughts Three words • Fear • Despair • Hope ….but from where?

  7. Fear • You look ahead • You have a survival instinct – Pain – Fear itself

  8. Despair • What research • No signposting • Research hindrances • The saddest days

  9. Time our Enemy

  10. Hope • Year 1 not a lot • Taking control • Involvement

  11. What is involvement?

  12. Long-recognized importance of participation A Ladder of Citizen Participation. – S R Arnstein. (1969) Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4); 216-224. http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry- arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html

  13. The research Topic identification & lifecycle prioritization Evaluation & Commissioning impact & funding Engagement Participation Dissemination & Design & implementation Involvement planning Analysis & Delivery reporting Regulation Policy

  14. Research involvement RADAR Bristol • Neuro-inflammation and amyloid • Hammersmith ALF Exeter • IDEAL Exeter • MADE Kings London • Hippocampal changes Bristol • EOAD genetics Exeter/Bristol •

  15. Every voice (woof) counts

  16. Frustrations • Anecdotal evidence • Public attitudes/silent majority • Success criteria • Implementation and dissemination • Silos • Inability to diagnose, perceived failures

  17. Data Knowledge Information

  18. My dilemma and my changing perceptions • Initially – Take/do anything • Then – Take some ownership of my destiny • Today – Risk/benefit decisions

  19. In a nutshell • I love being involved in research, it is therapeutic • I am listened to, maybe improving the research • I am well looked after, I receive better care • I have interesting discussions • I gain an insight into the latest theories and results • I have a purpose and a value • Crucially it keeps my brain active • I have a better understanding of my disease progression • and just maybe I will be one of the lucky ones who is part of the trial that finds the cure

  20. Those three words Today have changed • Fear has reduced to concern • Despair is now personal happiness • Hope is now great hope

  21. Leading to For a better quality of life for longer

  22. My philosophy • God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference. • Living one day at a time; Enjoying one moment at a time; Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace; …. Reinhold Niebuhr

  23. Thank you for listening and for all that you do from all three of us

  24. Electronic health records are essential to high quality patient care o EHRs can give patients more control over their own care o Can reduce patient safety risk and improve diagnostics and care o Can improve communication o Can lead to better care for patients with chronic diseases o Can optimise care -2014 Sowerby Commission Report

  25. Timeline of key policies NHS All England’s Patients will patients Paperless Five Year be able to will have 2020: All care Forward edit their online records will View own care access to be digital, published records their GP real-time, and records interoperable in full 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Peter Sowerby Commission Report

  26. An online survey of doctors’use of EHRs in England AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 500 DOCTORS SURVEYED IN ENGLAND To describe implementation of key UK policies by conducting an online survey of doctors 150 GPs 350 SC from across England use and perceptions of Partner Consultant EHRs Salaried GP Associate specialist Staff Grade SPR Years 4+

  27. More GPs use electronic functionalities than secondary care doctors 79% Communicating with other clinicians outside their organisation 76% 53% Entering patients' notes 98% Accessing clinical data about a patient who has been seen by a 46% 77% different organisation 39% Sending prescriptions to pharmacies 83% 35% Sending or receiving order requests from other organisations 74% Communicating electronically with patients to support remote 31% 33% consultations SC GP

  28. Secondary care doctors still receive important patient medical information through the post 12.00% Post Electronically/Email 18% 38% 15% 77.00% 44% 34.00% 33% GP Records Current Prescriptions Records of prior admissions Records of prior admissions to your hospital to other hospitals

  29. Extent to which doctors believe that EHRs could affect the ease of sharing medical records between primary and secondary care organisations 49% 48% 38% 36% GP SC 11% 9% 4% 3% 1% 1% Don’t know No improvement at Minor improvement Major improvement Significant all improvement

  30. Electronic access to clinical data when a patient has been seen by a different provider: is it available, and would doctors use it? Access to clinical data: Is it available? If it is not available, would you use it? 90% 49 I would use it It is available 85 93% 50 10% It is not I would not use it available 15 7% SC GP

  31. Clinical activities doctors would like to complete electronically GPs Secondary care 80% 81% 78% 75% 76% 73% 72% 63% Discharge summaries Care handover letters Hospital prescriptions Uploading documents after hospitalisation from outpatients

  32. Doctors’ views towards patient access to EHRs

  33. Conclusions • 1) GPs are engaging with EHRs, though there is more work to be done in secondary care • 2) GPs and secondary care doctors agree that EHRs will help information flow by reducing information lost due to fragmentation • 3) Concerns arise when patients are brought into medical data sharing approaches, particularly around working patterns, how to handle data, and how to interact with patients

  34. Evaluation of the Care Information Exchange Patient held records break down the barriers between care settings. North West London’s Care Information Exchange allows the sharing of medical records with patients and providers, and communication. Economic evaluation illustrates the potential benefits of implementing this programme.

  35. What is Self Care?

  36. Care Information Exchange The ability to view, add and share information about patient care. The opportunity for patients to take more control of their own health and care. New ways of communicating with health and social care professionals.

  37. How much is it costing us? • Digital health information tools cost money and require investment. • Cash savings might not be seen immediately. • Policy makers need support in making these investment decisions.

  38. Cost Benefit Analysis Costs Benefits Outcomes • Implementation •Reduced face-to-face •Savings in number of GP consultations GP appointments • Design •Reduced GP telephone •Savings in number of • Build consultations GP telephone • Test consultations • Startup costs •Enhanced shared Wider benefits • Running costs decision making •Reduced hospital • Equipment •Reduced referral time inpatient admissions • Training •Improved medical •Reduced A&E • Recurrent costs adherence admissions •Improved patient safety through increased error reporting

  39. Results Over 6000 GP face to face consultations saved in the first year. • Over 4000 telephone consultations saved in the first year. • Almost £310,000 saved within the first year. • Savings will increase as more patients enroll onto the programme. •

  40. Co Conclusion Economic evaluations are possible, but CCGs are under-resourced to collect good quality data. • CCGs need the analytical support to collect and interpret relevant, reliable, and up-to-date data. • Patient access to online medical records has the potential to create savings locally as well as enhance • patient engagement.

  41. A new home care model for people living with dementia Dr Des Holden, Medical Director, KSS AHSN 14 September 2016

  42. The future workforce of the NHS 46

  43. Figure 1 Patient demographics The Lancet 2012 380, 37-43DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2 )

Recommend


More recommend