u s department of agriculture agricultural research
play

U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service PLANTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service PLANTS FOR THE WEST Forage and Range Research Laboratory Legumes for Rangeland Restoration in the Semi- arid Western USA Shaun Bushman Doug


  1. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service PLANTS FOR THE WEST Forage and Range Research Laboratory Legumes for Rangeland Restoration in the Semi- arid Western USA Shaun Bushman Doug Johnson Tom Jones PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  2. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Need for North American Legumes PLANTS FOR THE WEST Important for: • Seeding diversification • Nitrogen fixation • Native pollinators • Wildlife food and habitat

  3. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Pipeline for germplasm development PLANTS FOR THE WEST 1. Seed 2. Evaluation collection 3. Select appropriate releases 6. Release for seeding 4. Germination and establishment protocols 5. Seed production

  4. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Collection Variation PLANTS FOR THE WEST Dalea searlsiae Lotus utahensis among Among Pops Pops 27% 29% Within Within Pops Pops 73% 71%

  5. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Assessing variation PLANTS FOR THE WEST Lotus species: Dalea searlsiae : • 3 common-gardens. • 2 common-gardens. • 19 collections transplanted. • 20 collections transplanted. • RCB design, 6-plant plots, 5 reps. • RCB design, 6-plant plots, 5 reps. • Two years post-establishment. • Two years post-establishment.

  6. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Measured Plant Traits PLANTS FOR THE WEST • Seed pod weight Fitness • Dry matter yield • Survival • Plant height Morphology • Number of stems • Foilage diameter • Flowering date Phenology • Acid detergent fiber • Neutral detergent fiber Forage quality • Crude protein

  7. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Dalea searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  8. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Trait Variation – D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST Traits PC1 PC2 PC3 Trait P value Eigenvalue 4.28 2.54 2.32 Cumulative proportion 0.63 0.76 0.87 Dry matter yield, g/plot ** Plant height, cm ** Dry matter yield, Hyde Park 0.78 0.25 -0.33 No. of stems ** Dry matter yield, Millville 0.86 0.25 0.17 Inflorescence weight 0.95 0.16 -0.19 No. of inflorescences ** No. of inflorescences, Millville 0.76 0.10 -0.57 Foliage diameter (cm) ** No. of inflorescences, Hyde Park 0.61 0.26 -0.64 ADF% ** Flowering date -0.07 -0.26 0.92 Plant height 0.48 0.45 0.17 NDF% * No. of stems 0.46 0.20 -0.37 Crude protein (CP), % ** Foliage diameter 0.69 0.18 -0.39 Acid detergent fiber 0.29 0.75 -0.45 Inflorescence weight, g/plot ** Neutral detergent fiber 0.08 0.94 -0.11 Flowering date * Crude protein -0.24 -0.72 0.20 1 * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01 PC1 loadings high for: DMY & seed yield PC2 loadings high for: Forage quality traits PC3 loadings high for: Flowering date

  9. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Trait variation and collection site – D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST Elev Temp Precip Recall that PC1 ~ DMY and seed yield. PC1 0.26 ns1 0.17 ns 0.76 ** PC2 0.11 ns 0.15 ns 0.31 ns PC3 -0.50 * 0.50 * -0.11 ns Precipitation helped to shape the genetic variation for these traits on the landscape.

  10. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Precipitation structure - D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST ~12” ~14”

  11. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Molecular variation and structure - D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  12. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Similarity within collections – D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST 0.800 0.780 NW Utah Under lake 0.760 Bonneville 0.740 Similarity index (S) 0.720 0.700 0.680 0.660 0.640 0.620 0.600

  13. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY How molecular variation relates - D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST Comparison r Genetic vs. Geographic 0.76** Genetic vs. Phenotypic 0.37** Genetic vs. Elevation 0.30* Genetic vs. Precipitation 0.01ns Genetic vs. MA Temp. 0.16ns Differences in precip. did not Strong isolation by distance. Correspond to genetic differences.

  14. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Release strategy - D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST Two common-garden and molecular marker supported releases. A third was requested because some collections officially reside in the Colorado Plateau.

  15. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Release strategy - D. searlsiae PLANTS FOR THE WEST Infl. weight Collection No. of infl. No. of infl. (g.plot -1 ) 29.6 EFG 32.2 CDEFG 25.4 BCDE Ds-12 21.7 G 26.8 EFG 8.8 G Ds-16 * 22.7 G 22.3 G 9.8 FG Ds-21 30.2 DEFG 27.8 DEFG 16.3 DEFG Ds-23 57.6 BCD 44.0 ABCDE 32.9 ABC Ds-03 20.7 G 26.1 DEFG 15.3 EFG Ds-05 22.1 FG 23.9 FG 18.2 DEFG Ds-07 49.1 BCDE 45.2 ABCDE 35.5 AB Ds-08 32.6 DEFG 33.8 CDEFG 20.4 BCDE Ds-09 33.5 CDEFG 43.1 ABCDEF 24.6 BCDE Ds-10 27.9 EFG 35.2 CDEFG 24.1 BCDE Ds-11 65.4 AB 52.3 ABC 45.0 A Ds-13 82.5 AB 60.5 AB 45.9 A Ds-15 51.3 BCD 44.6 ABCDE 35.2 AB Ds-18 29.5 DEFG 33.6 CDEFG 32.6 ABC Ds-20 46.3 BCDEF 44.7 ABCDE 32.5 ABC Ds-25 * 61.3 ABC 46.7 ABCD 35.2 AB Ds-26 20.7 G 29.9 DEFG Ds-01 - * 72.7 AB 42.0 BCDEF 25.8 BCDE Ds-14 58.4 BCD 34.1 CDEFG 21.1 CDEF Ds-17

  16. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Germination and establishment PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  17. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Germination and establishment PLANTS FOR THE WEST c c 40 # emerged of 50 f 30 d Daor 20 Dase 10 b a 0 NT acid sand Acid scarification best, emergence at ~70%. 60 a 50 b 30 b a c a bc 40 bc b b 30 d Daor 20 d 20 1/4 Dase 10 10 3/4 0 0 100% 66% sand 33% sand 100% clay Daor Dase sand Sandy soils work best in both species, emergence ¼” depth better than ¾”. near 100% for ornata and near 85% for searlsiae.

  18. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Seed production PLANTS FOR THE WEST shattering >150 lbs/ acre 2017 seed requests thus far: 61 lbs 4 entities

  19. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Lotus utahensis & wrightii PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  20. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Trait variation – L. utahensis PLANTS FOR THE WEST Variable Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Trait P value Eigenvalue 3.33 1.05 0.41 Dry matter yield, g/plot ** Cumulative 0.67 0.88 0.96 Plant height, cm ** No. of stems ** Morphology (C) -0.48 0.79 0.28 No. of inflorescences * Forage Quality (C) -0.14 0.89 0.35 Inflorescence weight, g/plot ** Condensed Tannins Foliage diameter (cm) ** -0.11 0.34 0.93 (D) ADF % -- Survival (D) 0.97 -0.10 -0.08 NDF% * Phenology (C) 0.84 -0.49 -0.13 Crude protein (CP), % ** Flowering date * 1 * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01 Factor 1: survival and flowering time Factor 2: DMY, morphology, forage qual. Factor 3: tannins

  21. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Trait variation and collection site – L. utahensis PLANTS FOR THE WEST phenology morphology tannins & survival & quality Factor 1 LU Factor 2 LU Factor 3 LU Latitude 0.17 ns 0.08 ns 0.15 ns Longitude 0.02 ns -0.01 ns 0.1 ns Elevation 0.32 ns 0.11 ns -0.17 ns Mean Ann Temp -0.22 ns -0.17 ns 0.17 ns Diurnal Temp Range -0.25 ns 0.18 ns 0.05 ns Warmest Month High -0.27 ns -0.09 ns 0.18 ns Coldest Month Low -0.22 ns -0.21 ns 0.1 ns Mean Ann Precip -0.35 ns 0.22 ns -0.22 ns Factors were not even moderately correlated with any environmental characteristic, so no indications of strong local adaptation.

  22. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Molecular variation and structure – Lotus PLANTS FOR THE WEST 1 Principal Coordinates (PCoA) 0.8 16 0.6 20 5 0.4 Coord. 2 0.2 17 19 15 9 8 0 18 7 23 6 2 4 corniculatus The rest 5,16,20 2,4,15 wrightii Coord. 1

  23. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Similarity within collections – Lotus PLANTS FOR THE WEST corniculatus 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0

  24. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY How molecular variation relates – L. utahensis PLANTS FOR THE WEST Discriminant Analysis: 3 groups within utahensis DMY Flowering date Pod mass distinguished the 3 utahensis groups . 5,16,20 2,4,15 wrightii

  25. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Seed Pod Weight in Lotus Collections PLANTS FOR THE WEST 5 5 16 20 4 Dry matter yield (g) 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pod mass (g)

  26. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Release strategy – L. utahensis PLANTS FOR THE WEST

  27. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Pipeline for germplasm development PLANTS FOR THE WEST 1. Seed 2. Evaluation collection 3. Select appropriate releases 6. Release for seeding 4. Germination and establishment protocols 5. Seed production

  28. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Other species PLANTS FOR THE WEST Astragalus filipes Dalea ornata Hedysarum boreale

  29. FORAGE AND RANGE RESEARCH LABORATORY Thank you! PLANTS FOR THE WEST Doug Johnson – 41 years Kevin Connors – 30 years Lisa Michaels Kim Thorsted Jason Stettler Kishor Bhattarai

  30. The preceding presentation was delivered at the 2017 National Native Seed Conference Washington, D.C. February 13-16, 2017 This and additional presentations available at http://nativeseed.info

Recommend


More recommend