Presenting a 90 ‐ Minute Encore Presentation of the Teleconference with Live, Interactive Q&A Trust Decanting: Flexibility and Danger Crafting Trust Terms to Achieve Tax Benefits, Revise Fiduciary Powers, and Mitigate Beneficiary Liability TUES DAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2011 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific T d Today’s faculty features: ’ f l f James P . S pica, Member, Dickinson Wright , Detroit r. Counsel, Fulbright & Jaworski , New Y Meryl G. Finkelstein, S ork Thomas R. Pulsifer, Partner, Morris Nichol Arsht & Tunnell , Wilmington, Del. Todd A. Flubacher, Partner, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell , Wilmington, Del. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10 .
Conference Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: • Click on the + sign next to “ Conference Materials” in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen hand column on your screen. • Click on the tab labeled “ Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon. 2
Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: • Close the notification box • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location • Click the S END button beside the box 3
Tips for Optimal Quality S S ound Quality d Q lit If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-873-1442 and enter your PIN when prompted Otherwise please send us a chat or e mail when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@ straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Qualit y To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again press the F11 key again. 4
5 S S TRAFFORD P UBLICATIONS W EBINAR P W Trust Decanting: Flexibility and Danger Thursday, October 6, 1:00-2:30 PM (EDT) T HE U SES AND B ENEFITS OF D ECANTING AND D ECANTING ’ S C ONCEPTUAL B ASIS IN THE C OMMON L AW James P. Spica Dickinson Wright PLLC Detroit 313-223-3090 j jspica@dickinsonwright.com i @di ki i ht
6 T HE U SE OF ‘D ECANTING ’: A L OOSE M ETAPHOR FIDUCIARY AND NON - FIDUCIARY POWERS OF APPOINTMENT FIDUCIARY AND NON FIDUCIARY POWERS OF APPOINTMENT By ‘Trust Decanting,’ we generally mean the exercise of a fiduciary, special By Trust Decanting, we generally mean the exercise of a fiduciary, special power of appointment to distribute assets from one trust to another This use of the term is under-determined by the metaphor on which it’s based y p The analogy to pouring spirits from one vessel to another is apt enough, but there’s no analogue in the decanting of spirits to our narrow reference to fiduciary powers: oenophiles know that one doesn’t need a sommelier or a trained waiter to decant wine; and similarly, in the right circumstances, a beneficial , special power of appointment may be as good as a fiduciary one for moving assets from one trust to another for moving assets from one trust to another
7 T HE U SE OF ‘D ECANTING ’: A L OOSE M ETAPHOR POWERS OF APPOINTMENT BY ANY OTHER NAME POWERS OF APPOINTMENT BY ANY OTHER NAME There are also powers of appointment we’re not in the habit of calling powers of There are also powers of appointment we re not in the habit of calling powers of appointment that can be used effectively to move assets from one trust to another, including: • powers of substitution (of the kind regularly used to attract “grantor trust” status), • powers of amendment and • powers of revocation or termination
8 T HE U SE OF ‘D ECANTING ’: A L OOSE M ETAPHOR POWERS TO DO THINGS OTHER THAN APPOINT POWERS TO DO THINGS OTHER THAN APPOINT And there are means of effectively “moving” assets from one trust to another And there are means of effectively moving assets from one trust to another that have nothing to do with powers of appointment (nor, indeed, with the movement of assets), including: • reformation or modification proceedings and • trust mergers
9 T HE U SES OF D ECANTING TO DECANT ( ASSUMING ONE CAN ) OR NOT TO DECANT TO DECANT ( ASSUMING ONE CAN ) OR NOT TO DECANT Whether “decanting” (in its narrow, if metaphorically under-determined sense) Whether decanting (in its narrow, if metaphorically under determined sense) is a better means of “moving” trust assets than • a beneficial, special power appointment, p p pp • a power of substitution, • a power of amendment, revocation or termination, • a reformation or modification proceeding or p g • a merger of trusts will depend on one’s motivations, on why exactly one wishes that the trust p , y y terms governing the assets in question were different
10 T HE U SES OF D ECANTING COMMON MOTIVATIONS COMMON MOTIVATIONS Common motivations for decanting include wishes: Common motivations for decanting include wishes: • to correct drafting errors or revise accurately rendered, but ill-advised provisions, e.g., a hobbling tax or perpetuities saving clause p g g p p g • to enhance administration, e.g., by bifurcating fiduciary functions so as to protect a less sophisticated, but integral trustee from investment responsibility • to address unanticipated circumstances concerning a beneficiary’s creditors, marital status, wealth or health, e.g., by creating a supplemental needs trust so as to allow a beneficiary to qualify for public assistance public assistance • to change a trust’s vintage so as to put the beneficiaries’ interests in the way of prospective legislative innovations, e.g., perpetuities reform
11 T HE U SES OF D ECANTING COMMON MOTIVATIONS ( CONTINUED ) COMMON MOTIVATIONS ( CONTINUED ) • to change situs or governing law to change situs or governing law • to supplement inadequate trustee provisions, e.g., by distinguishing the administrative powers of interested and disinterested trustees • to engineer income tax consequences, e.g., by granting the settlor a g q g y g g power that‘ll trigger grantor trust status, or by spinning off capital loss assets for sale by a separate trust that can promptly be terminated in distributions to beneficiaries who have capital gains • t to increase the longevity of transfer tax advantages, e.g., by tying the i th l it f t f t d t b t i th termination of a trust “grandfathered” under Treasury’s GST tax effective date regulations to the durations of extraneous measuring lives or by evading perpetuities constraints all together for trust assets to y g p p g which GST exemption has been allocated
12 T HE B ENEFITS OF D ECANTING COMPARING ALTERNATIVE MEANS COMPARING ALTERNATIVE MEANS As the common motivations we’ve described fairly suggest, one’s reasons for wishing that particular trust terms governing particular assets were different will often implicate possible alternative means of achieving preferable results The point is that in many cases, decanting may be superior to other means at hand; and that, in any case, one has to compare the relevant alternatives h d d th t i h t th l t lt ti
13 T HE B ENEFITS OF D ECANTING ILLUSTRATION 1: DECANTING VS . EXERCISE OF A BENEFICIAL POWER WHEN THE NEW TRUST WILL GRANT POWERS OF APPOINTMENT As between the use of a fiduciary, special power of appointment (i.e., As between the use of a fiduciary, special power of appointment (i.e., “decanting”) and a nonfiduciary one, for example, one has always to reflect that the nonfiduciary power may implicate the so-called “Delaware tax trap,” IRC section 2041(a)(3) and its gift tax counterpart, IRC section 2514(d); whereas the legislative history of these sections indicates that the “trap” h th l i l ti hi t f th ti i di t th t th “t ” wasn’t intended to apply to purely fiduciary powers of appointment, such as a trustee’s discretionary power to invade principal See S. R EP . No. 82-382, at 1 (1951), as reprinted in 1951 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1535, 1535
Recommend
More recommend
