Triangular solution to the general relativistic three-body problem
Kei Yamada Hirosaki University
with Ichita-san & Asada-san
Triangular solution to the general relativistic three-body problem - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Triangular solution to the general relativistic three-body problem Kei Yamada Hirosaki University with Ichita-san & Asada-san Contents Introduction Equilateral triangular solution in GR Triangular solution in GR: general
with Ichita-san & Asada-san
Particular solutions to the three-body problem Euler’s collinear solution (1765) & Lagrange’s equilateral triangular solution (1772)
C
C : the center of mass
60 60 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Jupiter Sun
60 60 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Trojan asteroids Jupiter Sun
60 60 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
Trojan asteroids Jupiter Sun
What happens in the general relativity (GR)?
Three-body systems: ? Two-body systems: (e.g. the perihelion precession of Mercury) It is interesting as a new test of GR
Einstein-Infeld-Hoffman (EIH) equation of motion for N bodies We look for an equilibrium solution in a circular motion
Newtonian term GR correction by mass GR correction by velocity
mK d2rK dt2 = X
A6=K
rAK GmAmK r3
AK
" 1 − 4 X
B6=K
GmB c2rBK − X
C6=A
GmC c2rCA ✓ 1 − rAK · rCA 2r2
CA
◆ + ⇣vK c ⌘2 + 2 ⇣vA c ⌘2 − 4 ⇣vA c ⌘ · ⇣vK c ⌘ − 3 2 vA
c
rAK !2 # − X
A6=K
h (vA c ) − (vK c ) i GmAmK r3
AK
rAK · h 3 ⇣vA c ⌘ − 4 ⇣vK c ⌘i + 7 2 X
A6=K
X
C6=A
rCA GmCmK r3
CA
GmA c2rAK
Triple product
Equilateral triangle
rIJ = a (I, J = 1, 2, 3)
a a a r1 r2 r3
m2 m3 m1
v3 v2 v1
In general, this is different from the Newtonian one
rG = P
A
νArA " 1 + 1 2 @ ⇣vA c ⌘2 − X
B6=A
GmB c2rAB 1 Aλ # P
C
νC " 1 + 1 2 @ ⇣vC c ⌘2 − X
D6=C
GmD c2rCD 1 Aλ # ,
λ ⌘ GM c2a ⌧ 1
In general, this is different from the Newtonian one
rG = P
A
νArA " 1 + 1 2 @ ⇣vA c ⌘2 − X
B6=A
GmB c2rAB 1 Aλ # P
C
νC " 1 + 1 2 @ ⇣vC c ⌘2 − X
D6=C
GmD c2rCD 1 Aλ #
In this case, this agrees with the Newtonian case But
, λ ⌘ GM c2a ⌧ 1
At 1PN order, EOM for becomes m1 n1 n⊥1 is normal to n1 ≡ r1/|r1|, n⊥1 ≡ v1/|v1|,
ω : angular velocity, νI ≡ mI/M, M =
mI (I = 1, 2, 3)
gP N1 = λ 16(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3)
M a3 × h 48(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3) − 2(8ν3 2 + 7ν2 2ν3 + 7ν2ν2 3 + 8ν3 3)
+ (16ν4
2 + 41ν3 2ν3 + 84ν2 2ν2 3 + 41ν2ν3 3 + 16ν4 3)
i
−ω2n1 = −M a3 n1 + gP N1n1 + √ 3 16 M a3 ν2ν3(ν2 − ν3) ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3
⇥ 6 + 9
⇤ λn⊥1
At 1PN order, EOM for becomes m1 n1 n⊥1 is normal to n1 ≡ r1/|r1|, n⊥1 ≡ v1/|v1|,
ω : angular velocity, νI ≡ mI/M, M =
mI (I = 1, 2, 3)
gP N1 = λ 16(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3)
M a3 × h 48(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3) − 2(8ν3 2 + 7ν2 2ν3 + 7ν2ν2 3 + 8ν3 3)
+ (16ν4
2 + 41ν3 2ν3 + 84ν2 2ν2 3 + 41ν2ν3 3 + 16ν4 3)
i
−ω2n1 = −M a3 n1 + gP N1n1 + √ 3 16 M a3 ν2ν3(ν2 − ν3) ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3
⇥ 6 + 9
⇤ λn⊥1
At 1PN order, EOM for becomes m1 n1 n⊥1 is normal to n1 ≡ r1/|r1|, n⊥1 ≡ v1/|v1|,
ω : angular velocity, νI ≡ mI/M, M =
mI (I = 1, 2, 3)
gP N1 = λ 16(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3)
M a3 × h 48(ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3) − 2(8ν3 2 + 7ν2 2ν3 + 7ν2ν2 3 + 8ν3 3)
+ (16ν4
2 + 41ν3 2ν3 + 84ν2 2ν2 3 + 41ν2ν3 3 + 16ν4 3)
i
−ω2n1 = −M a3 n1 + gP N1n1 + √ 3 16 M a3 ν2ν3(ν2 − ν3) ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3
⇥ 6 + 9
⇤ λn⊥1
In only 2 cases, bodies satisfy EOM;
−ω2n1 = −M a3 n1 + gP N1n1 + √ 3 16 M a3 ν2ν3(ν2 − ν3) ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3
⇥ 6 + 9
⇤ λn⊥1
In only 2 cases, bodies satisfy EOM;
[Ichita, KY & Asada, PRD 83, 084026 (2011)] −ω2n1 = −M a3 n1 + gP N1n1 + √ 3 16 M a3 ν2ν3(ν2 − ν3) ν2
2 + ν2ν3 + ν2 3
⇥ 6 + 9
⇤ λn⊥1
for restricted 3-body problem, used by [Seto & Muto, PRD 81, 103004 (2010)]
m3
a(1 + ε31) a(1 + ε12) a(1 + ε23) m2 m1
PN inequilateral triangle
rIJ = a(1 + εIJ), εIJ = O(1PN)
ω = ωN
We can ignore the 1PN correction to the center of mass
EOM for becomes m1 ω = ωN
−ω2r1 = − ω2
Nr1
+ ν2 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν3[5 − 3(ν1 + ν2)] ◆ λr21 + ν3 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν2[5 − 3(ν3 + ν1)] ◆ λr31 − 3(ν2ε12r21 + ν3ε31r31)
EOM for becomes m1 ω = ωN = 0
−ω2r1 = − ω2
Nr1
+ ν2 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν3[5 − 3(ν1 + ν2)] ◆ λr21 + ν3 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν2[5 − 3(ν3 + ν1)] ◆ λr31 − 3(ν2ε12r21 + ν3ε31r31)
EOM for becomes m1 ω = ωN = 0
−ω2r1 = − ω2
Nr1
+ ν2 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν3[5 − 3(ν1 + ν2)] ◆ λr21 + ν3 ✓ −3 + ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1 − 3 8ν2[5 − 3(ν3 + ν1)] ◆ λr31 − 3(ν2ε12r21 + ν3ε31r31)
Triangular solution for the arbitrary mass ratio at 1PN [KY & Asada, submitted] As a result, we could uniquely express εIJ
ε12 = − 1 − 1 3(ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1) + 1 8ν3[5 − 3(ν1 + ν2)]
ε23 = − 1 − 1 3(ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1) + 1 8ν1[5 − 3(ν2 + ν3)]
ε31 = − 1 − 1 3(ν1ν2 + ν2ν3 + ν3ν1) + 1 8ν2[5 − 3(ν1 + ν3)]
Planet Sun-Planet Sun-L4 (L5) Planet-L4 (L5) Earth
Jupiter
Corrections for L4 (L5) of Solar system [m] The sign + denotes increase of distance