TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FINANCING S. SIVAMATHAN GM/FINANCE
Features of Metro Financing Rail Based MRTS projects are: Highly capital intensive, Long Gestation Period, Low Financial IRR since it cannot increase the fare beyond a point (FIRR of Phase-III: 1.59%), But having High Economic IRR (Social Benefits, EIRR of Phase-III: 17.15%). So far the funding has been made mainly through Budgetary Support from GOI and State Government as well as loan from multilateral /bilateral agencies.
Features of Metro Financing Experience all over the world reveals that both construction and operations of a metro are highly subsidised and funded by the Government. Hong Kong : 78% for the first three lines and 66% for the subsequent 2 lines. • Singapore Metro: – Government provides full infrastructure including rolling stock and another agency operates the system. – Difference in replacement costs and historical cost of assets is met by the government. Others run on Governmental support and subsidies. Sao Paulo, New York and Paris metros have access to tax levies.
OBJECTIVE OF INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING • Main objectives of infrastructure funding excluding capex are: – Long term financial sustainability of the system by: • Setting fares and having fare revision mechanism from time to time will minimise dependence on subsidies • Providing an environment for the MRA to generate alternative sources of revenues i.e., the difference in the EIRR and FIRR is captured. • Recovering return from both direct and indirect beneficiaries
DMRC’S (O&M) Financial Overview Fare fixed by Regulatory Authority headed by a retired Judge of a High Court. Fare from Rs. 8/- to Rs.30/- lowest in the world except Kolkata. Last fare revision in Sep-2009. So far, 3 FFC were constituted. GOI is in the process of notifying 4 th FFC for revising the fare structure. The system is making Operational Profit from Day One (EBITA). About 25% revenue is from Non-Fare Box Collection. DMRC is able to service and pay back the JICA loans without asking any subsidy from the Government. Till date DMRC has paid Rs. 2869.50 crore to GOI towards JICA related payments: - - Interest Rs.1837.32 crore & Repayment Rs.1032.18 crore. Operating Ratio is decorating: FY 2014-15 67.22%. FY 2013-14 60.04%.
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) For Financing of Infrastructure Projects
NEED FOR TOD IN MRTS MRTS projects i.e., Rail and Bus based, are high capacity MRTS. The projects are amenable to TOD as well as densification along the MRTS corridor through additional FAR. To improve the financial sustainability of the MRTS projects, it is important to have: As many MRTS users to live within walking distance of stations, Because of MRTS projects, there is a huge spurt in the prices of property (sale as well as rental). The increase in the prices of property go primarily to the private parties even though the same is caused only on account of government investment.
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Activity centre's established around a transport/transit node. Medium to high density housing. Mix of retail, employment, commercial and civic development. Enhanced accessibility via: Walking, Cycling, and Public transport.
NEED FOR TOD IN MRTS Government to encash the increased property value (sale/rental) in the catchment area of MRTS corridor as well as increased FAR along the MRTS corridor. The fund so generated can be used for the following: To part fund the project cost, To provide interest subsidy so that loan to the SPV is available on a very concessional rate. To provide operational subsidies, if any The above will improve the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of the SPV .
DMRC – PART FUNDING FROM PD • DMRC contributed funds towards capex from IA & PD: • Phase-I Rs.728 crore (7%) of the capex • Phase-II Rs.1050 crore for Phase-II • Phase-III Target is Rs.2505 crore from PD. • How it was generated? – Land leased out to private developers against payment of fixed upfront amount and the balance in monthly rentals.
Dedicated Urban Transport Fund • For Phase-III, GNCTD to set up Dedicated urban Transport Fund to create a pool of resources to: • Replacement of assets, • Providing interest subsidy and • Providing operational subsidies. • Yet to be set up .
Innovative Financing Mechanism by BMRCL • Govt. of Karnataka, while sanctioning Phase- II of Bangalore Metro decided to mobilize funds through Cess/TDR: – Levy of Cess and Surcharge @ 5% of the market value of land or/and building in future developments, to be credited to Metro Infrastructure Fund and to be shared between BMRCL, BWSSB and BDA @ 65%, 20% and 15% respectively. – To extend the benefit of 4 FAR for all properties lying within a distance of 500 meters from the Metro alignment. – Levy cess @ 10% in r/o residential buildings and 20% in r/o commercial buildings on the additional FAR granted and to share the same among BMRCL, BBMP, BWSSB and BDA @ 60%, 20%, 10% and 10% respectively .
FUNDING OF HYDERABAD METRO Amount Particulars (Rs./Billion) Total cost 141.32 Less VGF by GoI 14.58 Less VGF by GoAP 0.00 Concessionaire cost 126.74 Concessionaire Debt 99.08 Concessionaire Equity 27.66
HYDERABAD METRO - PD • The concessionaire was allowed to commercially develop real estate in 18.50 million square feet areas. • Revenue form the real estate shall constitute 45% of the total revenue generated from the project. – Concessionaire would be allowed to undertake real- estate development at and above the first floor level of all depots. – The total land for depots is 212 acres. – Concessionaire also to have access to 20% of the floor area of each station for commercial development. • In addition, concessionaire can undertake real estate development over the parking and circulation areas at station as well.
TOD IN DELHI
WHY TOD DMRC eagerly awaiting for the approval of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) policy as it has to raise Rs. 2505 Crores from PD for the Phase-lll: TOD Policy gives higher FAR . TOD means Money TOD shall promote use of public transport: Which will reduce congestion and pollution in the city. Increase the ridership of MRTS system.
Barriers to equitable and inclusive TOD Achieving FAR 4 is some time not possible, because of encumbrance like: Height restriction due to air funnel, Structure design of existing or under construction buildings, Acquiring FAR involves cost. Exemption is available for GOI & GNCTD, DMRC should be included in the list. TOD should be permitted in Monument Regulated Zone subject to guidelines of NMA.
Barriers to equitable and inclusive TOD DMRC’s few stand alone plots are complying with TOD conditions: Malviya Nagar, Jantar Mantar, Janakpuri West, Mundka etc. DMRC’s plan to have residential development: GOI directions prohibits DMRC to lease out land for residential purpose (normally). Some plots are designated under Industrial Use: DMRC can take up residential development only in 30% area. Some plots (Mundka) are located on existing roads with a width of less than 18 m ROW.
RISKS IN FINANCING OF TOD Residential & Commercial may not go together. Bhikaji Cama Palace: A PSU is being approached to have office space on long term lease basis by paying about 30% of PV of expected rental value over a period of 45 years. The balance rentals shall be paid on month to month basis. Jantar Mantar & NS Place : In the process of floating tender to assess the marketability of office space. DMRC don’t have fund for undertaking TOD. Will try to rope in few MNCs, big corporate houses to pay upfront money and balance through monthly rentals.
Thank You www. delhimetrorail.com
Recommend
More recommend