Proceedings of 25th ITTC – Volume I 325 The Quality Systems Group Final Report and Recommendations to the 25th ITTC 3. Cross - check the ITTC Symbols List and the Dictionary with other standards e.g. 1. GENERAL ISO Standards 1.1 Membership and Meetings 4. Stimulate, monitor and support validation work within the Technical Committees. Dipl. Ing. Barbara Günther, SVA Potsdam, Germany Additional tasks received by the AC.: Prof. Dr. Ing. Marco Ferrando, University of Genoa, Italy 5. Produce a procedure on the review proc- ess of the AC Working Groups. Dipl. Ing. Akio Ito, IHI Corporation. Japan Dr. Chun-Ju Lee, MOERI (former KRISO) 6. Format the Rules for ITTC as a Proce- Korea dure. Prof. Dr. Ing. Gerhard Strasser, Vienna Model 7. Consider ways of publishing data. Basin, Austria The group met three times: 2. TASKS PERFORMED 6 th – 7 th July 2006 Yokohama, Japan 25 th – 26 th June 2007, Potsdam, Germany 2.1 Procedure on the Review Process of 7 th – 8 th April 2008, Genova, Italy the AC Working Groups. By the Advisory Council a procedure for All members attended all meetings the review of the ITTC Recommended Proce- . dures and Guidelines by the AC was developed. Tasks given by the 24 th ITTC to the QS 1.2 Procedure 4.2-03 was prepared. It deals Group. with work organization within the Advisory 1. Revise and update the ITTC Recom- Council with regard to tasking and monitoring mended Procedures. Modify and re-edit the Technical Committees and Groups: the existing procedures according to the comments of the Conference and the 1. The Secretary of the Executive Committee Technical Committees. should write to the chairmen of all of the technical committees after the Conference 2. Update the ITTC Symbols and Terminol- to inform them of the tasks for each com- ogy List. mittee. 2. The Advisory Council should review the progress of the work of each committee.
The Quality Systems Group 326 Each committee should prepare an interim reviewing proposed ITTC recommended pro- report for consideration at the Council cedures. meetings; the reports should include a statement on the progress of the commit- 1. Accepted without reservation and proposed tee’s work, attendance at meetings, and any to the Full Conference. other matters requiring the attention of the The procedure describes current practice in Council. many organizations, and while not all or- 3. Drafts for new or amended procedures ganizations will follow it in all details there should be submitted to the Advisory Coun- is sufficient flexibility in the procedure to cil during the autumn the year before the enable most organizations who are active in full Conference. the area to follow it "in principle", and to note the exceptions in their own procedures. 4. The EC and AC secretary should write a note to all TC chairmen giving the formali- 2. Accepted, with minor editorial revisions ties and deadline dates, which the commit- proposed to the Full Conference. tees should follow. The procedure will be acceptable provided 5. The AC should perform the following task minor editorial changes are made. To en- sure consistency Quality Systems Group a) draft recommendations for terms of ref- will make the changes, and the procedure erence (ToR) for general committees will be returned to the technical committee b) identify requirements and propose terms for its acceptance of the changes. of reference for specialist technical committees 3. Accepted, with areas of concern noted pro- posed to the Full Conference. c) review and make recommendations on The procedure, although requiring more proposed ITTC procedures work, will be useful to the ITTC members d) propose topics for group discussions at as it is written and should be proposed the full Conference without delay. The comments of the work- ing group should be published with the pro- e) support the new Committees as regards cedure. It is impractical for the present the start up and interpretation of their technical committee to make the changes tasks required to address the working group's concerns in the time available. The revi- To this effect and acc. to rule 7.4 of the sions will be done by another committee ITTC, several Working Groups can be estab- and included in a later revision. lished within the Advisory Council. The num- ber of working groups, as well as the commit- 4. Proposing postponed tees to be monitored by each group have to be Either the physical basis of the procedure is decided at the first AC meeting of each confer- not in line with current practice or there are ence. For each group a chairman will be nomi- other technical problems making the proce- nated to co-ordinate the work of the group. The dure impractical for many organizations to working load should be evenly distributed follow. A procedure might also not be ac- among the Working Groups. cepted because the document is not drafted to a level of detail at which it could be use- Each Working Group has to report to the ful or because it is inconsistent with other Advisory Council Meetings. published ITTC procedures. The revisions The following criteria have been estab- required are major and would be proposed as a task for a future committee. lished to assist the Advisory Council Working Groups to come to consistent decisions when
Proceedings of 25th ITTC – Volume I 327 Procedure 4.2-01 “Adoption or Modifica- 7.5-02-03-03.4 7.5-02-07-03.3 tion of ITTC Recommended Procedures and 7.5-02-04-01 7.5-02-07-04.2 Guidelines had to be adjusted accordingly. 7.5-02-04-02 7.5-02-07-04.3 7.5-02-04-02.1 7.5-03-01-04 2.2 Review of the “ITTC Recommended 7.5-02-04-02.2 7.5-03-01-02 Procedures” 7.5-02-04-02.3 7.5-03-01-03 7.5-02-04-02.4 7.5-03-02-01 During the 24 th ITTC it has been decided 7.5-02-04-02.5 7.5-03-02-02 that the technical committees in addition to the 7.5-02-05-04 7.5-04-01-01.1 new procedures review some of the ITTC Rec- 7.5-02-05-04.1 7.5-04-01-01.2 ommended Procedures with respect to content 7.5-02-05-05 7.5-04-03-01 and actuality. This in the long run should lead to higher quality of the Procedures. Procedures dealing with uncertainty analy- The following procedures have been pro- sis could not be updated because the Symbols duced or updated by the Technical Committees List for uncertainty was not updated by the and following the new procedure reviewed by time when the review was done. The Symbols the Advisory Council. After this all the below List has now been supplied by the Specialist procedures have been reviewed also by the Committee of Uncertainty Analysis. The AC ITTC QS Group. has decided that these procedures are going to be updated in the next period. The list below shows that there is only one procedure with “Concern noted” and none is During the revision it turned out that there postponed. This is, compared to the last period, was a necessity to approach the advisory coun- an improvement. cil with regard to waterjet propulsion (7.5-02- 05-03.1, 7.5-02-05-03.2, 7.5-02-05-03.3), as Additionally the Register 0.0 has been up- there are many symbols not included in the dated. symbols list and the group has not the compe- tence to “confirm newly invented symbols”. Furthermore the QS Group has revised ex- These procedures should be updated during the isting procedures with respect to symbols, ter- next period. minology and formatting issues: Also the template for producing ITTC Rec- ommended Procedures and Guidelines has been updated. 7.5-02-01-03 7.5-02-05-06 7.5-02-03-03.2 7.5-02-05-07
The Quality Systems Group 328 Committee Submitted procedure AC decision Comments Advisory 1.0-01 Accepted Rewrite Rules of the ITTC Council 4.2-01 Accepted Update Adoption or Modification of ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines 4.2-03 Accepted New Review of ITTC Recom- mended Procedures by the Advisory Council Resistance 7.5-01-01-01 Minor revision Review Ship Models 7.5-02-02-01 Accepted Review Resistance Tests 7.5-02-02-02 Accepted Review Uncertainty Analysis, Ex- ample for Resistance Test 7.5-02-02-03 Accepted Review Uncertainty Analysis, Spreadsheet for Resistance Measurements 7.5-02-02-04 Accepted Review Uncertainty Analysis, Spreadsheet for Speed Measurements 7.5-02-02-05 Accepted Review Uncertainty Analysis, Spreadsheet for Sinkage and Trim Measurements 7.5-02-02-06 Accepted Review Uncertainty Analysis, Spreadsheet for Wave Pro- file Measurements 7.5-03-01-01 Minor revision Review Uncertainty Analysis in CFD, Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures Propulsion 7.5-01-02-02 Minor revision Review Propeller Model Accuracy 7.5-02-03-01.1 Minor revision Review Propulsion Test 7.5-02-03-02.1 Minor revision Review Propeller Open Water Test 7.5-02-03-02.3 Accepted Review Guide for use of LDV 7.5-02-05-02 Accepted Review
Recommend
More recommend
