The problem Index (2005=100) of motorcycle and moped fatalities - PDF document

The problem Index (2005=100) of motorcycle and moped fatalities compared with other modes Influencing factors on the acceptance of of transport in the EU, 2005-2014 Advanced Rider Assistance Systems (ARAS) Ralf Risser, Lukas Hartwig, Karin Ausserer, Ernst Tomasch, Alessio Sevarin, Michael Gruber, Christian Rathgeb Funded by the Austrian Road Safety Fund of the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation & Technology. Source: ERSO 2016: Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2016 – Motorcycles & Mopeds 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 About the research project moTFas About the research project moTFas • Identification of common motorcycle accident • Identification of common motorcycle accident scenarios from the analysis of statistical and in- scenarios from the analysis of statistical and in- depth data bases depth data bases • Simulation of typical accidents with and without • Simulation of typical accidents with and without ARAS ARAS • Data collection of the behaviour of the ARAS in • Data collection of the behaviour of the ARAS in different real life riding scenarios different real life riding scenarios • Determination of the acceptance/acceptability • Determination of the acceptance/acceptability of selected ARAS of selected ARAS – Mixed methods approach: – Mixed methods approach: • Focus groups to develop items • Focus groups to develop items • Survey amongst Austrian motor bikers (n=401) • Survey amongst Austrian motor bikers (n=401) 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018

Acceptance or acceptability? ARAS under examination • Blind spot monitoring • Curve warning • Forward collision warning • Cornering ABS • Traction control • Autonomous emergency braking Source: Vlassenroot et. al. (2005): Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 ARAS under examination – which The survey ones are already available? • Blind spot monitoring • Online survey (n=401) conducted in winter 2017/2018 • Curve warning • Items about: • Forward collision warning – Risk-perception & risk-taking behaviour • Cornering ABS – Attitudes towards other road users • Traction control – Social-demographic data – 9-10 items (with Likert-scale) for the • Autonomous emergency braking evaluation of ARAS 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018

Acceptance or acceptability? Results: perceived effectiveness This system could prevent traffic accidents (n=401) 70 60 50 Blind-spot monitoring Curve warning in percent 40 Forward collision warning Cornering ABS 30 Traction control AEB 20 10 0 strongly agree agree neither agree nor disagree strongly disagree disagree Source: Vlassenroot et. al. (2005): Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 Results: perceived usefulness Results: influencing factors Influence on the positive evaluation/acceptance of ARAS I would like to have this system on my motor bike (n=401) Influence No (significant) influence 60 Experience with a system in passenger Past accidents and injuries cars 50 Blind-spot monitoring 40 Curve warning in percent Forward collision warning 30 Cornering ABS Positive view of assistance systems Sex ( ! low n for female riders) Traction control 20 and technological innovations AEB Non-sportive riding style Self-critical perception of the dangers of riding 10 0 Use of the motor bike for commuting ( ! low n for strongly agree agree neither agree nor disagree strongly disagree commuters) disagree Year-round riding (4 seasons) Mileage 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018

Acceptance scores Conclusion Acceptance is higher for… Acceptance scores of examined ARAS • currently available systems Maximum achievable score = 100 • systems currently available in passenger 80 71 70 cars 60 60 51 48 46 • systems that activate in emergencies only 50 Score 40 34 30 20 10 � Riders‘ individual attitudes towards 0 technology and their risk-taking Blind-spot Curve warning Forward collision Cornering ABS Traction control AEB behaviour/riding style matter a lot, too! monitoring warning 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 Literature Thank you for European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO) (2016): Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2016 – Motorcycles & Mopeds. On: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota your attention! /bfs2016_motomoped.pdf Vlassenroot, S.; Brookhuis, K.; Marchau, V.A.W.J. ; Witlox, Frank (2005) : Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS): A conceptual analysis based on the case of Intelligent Speed lukas.hartwig@factum.at Adaptation (ISA). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Jg.13, Nr.3, S.164–178. Acknowledgements for their essential contributions to this project to: Funded by the Austrian Road Safety Fund of the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation & Technology. 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018 31 st ICTCT Conference, Porto, Portugal, 25 th & 26 th October 2018