The Future Of The German Business Register Keno Kuhlmann Rolf König Principal Consultant Head of Project Group AuRegis Projectmanager AuRegis Head of Working Group RegisSTAR Atos IT Solutions and Services GmbH Director of the Local Court Coesfeld,Germany
The Situation The German Business Register 16 States (Länder) 116 Courts 2 Business Register Systems RegisSTAR Aureg
The History 1997 Founding of the Developer Network RegisSTAR and Aureg 1999 First test run of RegisSTAR 2003 Implementation of RegisSTAR in North Rhine – Westfalia 2007 Implementation of RegisSTAR and Aureg in all States 2011 AUREG-States decide to join RegisSTAR 2014 Start of the Work on AuRegis
The Challenge
The Challenge Can you modernize the electronical Business Register System within a local court system with differing regulatory frameworks in varying IT-Infrastructures for all 16 states of Germany?
Challenges Data Migration from Aureg and RegisSTAR Sum: 5.046.477
Additional Challenges 3 IT-Infrastructures Reference Environment 1: Oracle Stack • Reference Environment 2: Microsoft Stack • Reference Environment 3: „ eAkte as a Service“ •
Additional Challenges Service-Oriented Architecture (SoA)
Additional Challenges Building Software Components in cooperation with the German Land Registry • User Authorization Administration • Person Administration • Document Generation • Logging • Administration of Dates and Deadlines • Cost & Fee Processing • Allocation of Duties Administration
Additional Challenges Serving different File Management Systems Accessibility (BITV 2.0) Serving different Infrastructure Components
The Solution
Boundary Conditions Parallele operation of migrated and legacy Multiple Register and registers existing and computer evolving people speak neighboring different systems languages Multiple Constantly evolving AuRegis evolving plattforms register
Reasoning + Conclusion Embrace Moving target constant Flexibility changes Create a Enable Missunderstandings supporting Use all channels Communication environment Inlining of Use of common Minimize Reduce Friction requierements open source dependencies and technology web technology Early and Constant Precise project intensive Visibility of test Optimization of and testing Automated tests envolvement of results solution and quality targets future users Anticipate Avoid dead end Give good ideas Use vital Look ahead problems roads a chance momentum
On project execution 2016 2017 2018 2018 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Projektinitialisierung Projektplanung AuRegis Iteration 1 Konzeption Entwicklung FT Test ST Meilensteinprüfung MSP Iteration 2 Konzeption Entwicklung FT Test ST Meilensteinprüfung MSP Iteration 3 Konzeption Entwicklung FT Test ST Meilensteinprüfung MSP Projektabschluss Schlusstest ST Abnahmetest AT dabag Iteration 1 ST M dabag Iteration 2 ST M dabag Iteration 3 ST M ST M dabag Iteration 4 dabag Iteration 5 ST M dabag Abnahme Schluss-ST Abnahme dabag c Stand: 24.10.2017
On Communication Customer and Provider share the communication over all phases of the life cicle • Mix of online and on site Meetings meetings • Training on UML and common Language elaboration of des. & doc. Requirements Design • Milestone include a week of Synchronisazion common evaluation • Service matter experts amoung Domain knowledge the programmers Test Implementation • Search, Messaging, Object Extend SoA wisely Store, etc. Monitor • Take appropiate Action
On technology SQL databases for register data Java for serverside logic HTML5/CSS3/JS in form of Angular for clients Elasticsearch, RabbitMQ, Redis, Jinja2 Interfaces REST or massive language support Stay close to actual development, timely updates
On Technology Example OpenAPI Specification
On technology example responsive design
On technology example Elasticsearch Definition Flexibility on • data • structure • Tokenizer • Language • Filters • Synonyms • Relevance Register • data Keywords • Stopwords • Scalability Without need to change the core system Search Results
On technology example Jinja2 Durch rechtskräftigen Beschluss des Amtsgerichts {{ m.txt(label='Ort des Insolvenzgericht') }} vom {{ m.dt(label='Beschlußdatum') }} {{ m.txt(label='Geschäftszeichen des Insolvenzgerichts') }} wurde die Eröffnung des Insolvenzverfahrens über das Vermögen der Gesellschaft mangels einer den Kosten des Verfahrens entsprechenden Masse abgewiesen. Created by user {{ m.cb(option='Die Gesellschaft ist hierdurch aufgelöst. Gemäß § 60 Abs. 1 GmbHG i.V. § 65 Abs. 1 GmbhG von Amtswegen eingetragen.' )}} Seamless integration Into AuRegis
On technology Example Justice workspace
Questions Thank you! Questions?
Recommend
More recommend
