the average case complexity of counting cliques in erd os
play

The Average-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques in Erd os-R enyi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Average-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques in Erd os-R enyi Hypergraphs Enric Boix-Adser` a, Matthew Brennan and Guy Bresler MIT June 29, 2020 Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June


  1. The Average-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques in Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Hypergraphs Enric Boix-Adser` a, Matthew Brennan and Guy Bresler MIT June 29, 2020 Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 1 / 22

  2. Setup Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 2 / 22

  3. Setup G s ( n , p ) is the Erd˝ os-R´ enyi hypergraph: A distribution over random n -vertex s -uniform hypergraphs 1 Each s -subset of vertices is a hyperedge independently with prob. p 2 Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 2 / 22

  4. Setup G s ( n , p ) is the Erd˝ os-R´ enyi hypergraph: A distribution over random n -vertex s -uniform hypergraphs 1 Each s -subset of vertices is a hyperedge independently with prob. p 2 3-clique 4-clique 5-clique Counting k -cliques in G is the problem of outputting the exact number of complete k -vertex subgraphs in G w.h.p. Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 2 / 22

  5. Setup G s ( n , p ) is the Erd˝ os-R´ enyi hypergraph: A distribution over random n -vertex s -uniform hypergraphs 1 Each s -subset of vertices is a hyperedge independently with prob. p 2 3-clique 4-clique 5-clique Counting k -cliques in G is the problem of outputting the exact number of complete k -vertex subgraphs in G w.h.p. Constant clique size k = Θ(1) throughout Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 2 / 22

  6. Our Question: How does the optimal running time T for counting k -cliques in G s ( n , p ) trade off with n , p and s ? Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 3 / 22

  7. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 4 / 22

  8. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Algorithmic barriers in clique problems on G ( n , p ) studied for decades Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 4 / 22

  9. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Algorithmic barriers in clique problems on G ( n , p ) studied for decades Planted Clique: Find a k -clique planted in G ( n , 1 / 2) Lower bounds for greedy, SOS hierarchy, SQ algorithms, resolution (Jerrum ’92, Barak et al. ’16, Feldman et al. ’13, Atserias et al. ’18, etc.) Hardness implies stat-comp gaps (Berthet-Rigollet ’13, Koiran-Zouzias ’14, Hajek-Wu-Xu ’15, Ma-Wu ’15, B.-Bresler-Huleihel ’18, ’19, etc.) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 4 / 22

  10. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Algorithmic barriers in clique problems on G ( n , p ) studied for decades Planted Clique: Find a k -clique planted in G ( n , 1 / 2) Find Large Cliques: Find largest clique possible in G ( n , 1 / 2) Lower bounds for Metropolis, greedy (Karp ’76, Grimmet-Mcdiarmid ’75, Mcdiarmid ’84, Jerrum ’92, etc...) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 5 / 22

  11. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Algorithmic barriers in clique problems on G ( n , p ) studied for decades Planted Clique: Find a k -clique planted in G ( n , 1 / 2) Find Large Cliques: Find largest clique possible in G ( n , 1 / 2) Find Critical Cliques: Find a k -clique in G ( n , n − α ) Lower bounds for AC 0 and monotone circuits (Rossman ’08, Rossman ’10) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 6 / 22

  12. Clique Problems on Erd˝ os-R´ enyi Graphs Algorithmic barriers in clique problems on G ( n , p ) studied for decades Planted Clique: Find a k -clique planted in G ( n , 1 / 2) Find Large Cliques: Find largest clique possible in G ( n , 1 / 2) Find Critical Cliques: Find a k -clique in G ( n , n − α ) Many Others: e.g. Gamarnik-Sudan ’14, Coja-Oghlan-Efthymiou ’15, Rahman-Virag ’17 Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 7 / 22

  13. Why k -Clique Counting? Ideally would base average-case hardness on worst-case hardness e.g. prove planted clique is NP-hard Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 8 / 22

  14. Why k -Clique Counting? Ideally would base average-case hardness on worst-case hardness e.g. prove planted clique is NP-hard, BUT Barriers against worst-case to average-case reductions for NP-complete problems (Feigenbaum-Fortnow ’93, Bogdanov-Trevisan ’05) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 8 / 22

  15. Why k -Clique Counting? Ideally would base average-case hardness on worst-case hardness e.g. prove planted clique is NP-hard, BUT Barriers against worst-case to average-case reductions for NP-complete problems (Feigenbaum-Fortnow ’93, Bogdanov-Trevisan ’05) Work-around : Counting k -cliques is in P – and we show (fine-grained) average-case hardness from worst-case hardness assumption Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 8 / 22

  16. Plan for Rest of the Talk 1 Overview of algorithmic results: Previously-known worst-case algorithms and our algorithms on G s ( n , p ) 2 Main hardness result: Partial answer to our question 3 Proof sketch: Worst-case to average-case reduction 4 Open Problems: Error tolerance, approximation hardness and more Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 9 / 22

  17. Algorithms for Counting k -Cliques Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 10 / 22

  18. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  19. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case? Same as worst-case? p = Θ(1) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  20. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case? Same as worst-case? p = Θ(1) O ( n τ +1 − α ( τ +1 s )) Fast matrix Sparse G s ( n , p ) � τ � mult. speedup τ largest s.t. α < 1 p = Θ( n − α ) s − 1 (ours) (ours) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  21. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case? Same as worst-case? p = Θ(1) O ( n τ +1 − α ( τ +1 s )) Fast matrix Sparse G s ( n , p ) � τ � mult. speedup τ largest s.t. α < 1 p = Θ( n − α ) s − 1 (ours) (ours) 1 Faster algorithms for sparse Erdos-Renyi than worst-case! Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  22. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case? Same as worst-case? p = Θ(1) O ( n τ +1 − α ( τ +1 s )) Fast matrix Sparse G s ( n , p ) � τ � mult. speedup τ largest s.t. α < 1 p = Θ( n − α ) s − 1 (ours) (ours) 1 Faster algorithms for sparse Erdos-Renyi than worst-case! 2 What can be improved? Under ETH, worst-case runtime n Ω( k ) Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  23. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case? Same as worst-case? p = Θ(1) O ( n τ +1 − α ( τ +1 s )) Fast matrix Sparse G s ( n , p ) � τ � mult. speedup τ largest s.t. α < 1 p = Θ( n − α ) s − 1 (ours) (ours) 1 Faster algorithms for sparse Erdos-Renyi than worst-case! 2 What can be improved? Under ETH, worst-case runtime n Ω( k ) 3 How about average-case? Our main result: lower-bounds on run-time based on worst-case hardness Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 11 / 22

  24. Algorithm run-times Hypergraphs ( s ≥ 3) Graphs ( s = 2) O ( n k ) O ( n ω ⌊ k / 3 ⌋ ) Worst-case (exhaustive search) (Nesetril-Poljak ’85) Dense G s ( n , p ) Same as worst-case! Same as worst-case! p = Θ(1) O ( n τ +1 − α ( τ +1 s )) Fast matrix Sparse G s ( n , p ) � τ � mult. speedup τ largest s.t. α < 1 p = Θ( n − α ) s − 1 (ours) (ours) 1 Faster algorithms for sparse Erdos-Renyi than worst-case! 2 What can be improved? Under ETH, worst-case runtime n Ω( k ) 3 How about average-case? Our main result: lower-bounds on run-time based on worst-case hardness Boix-Adser` a, Brennan and Bresler (MIT) Avg-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques June 29, 2020 12 / 22

Recommend


More recommend