the artificial physicist
play

The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with statistical learning Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar Project INRIA Workshop on Statistical Learning IHP 05/12/2011 Guillaume Charpiat


  1. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist or fully automatic modeling with statistical learning Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar Project INRIA Workshop on Statistical Learning IHP 05/12/2011 Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  2. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Statistical Learning ◮ Learning what ? What for ? In which scope ? ◮ Most often : predefined models , estimation of parameters ◮ Range of models thus learnable ? → Model selection : within a family (idem : meta-parameters) ֒ ◮ How to learn the model itself ? the algorithms ? Creativity ? ◮ Flexibility, expressivity, evolvability ? → Expressivity : of classifiers [Vapnik], of languages... ֒ → Evolvability [Valiant] : what is learnable ? evolutionary (genetic) algo. ֒ ◮ Genuine AI : No absolute prior model (everything questionable) → No restriction (could discover any kind of new model) ֒ → Be creative : expressivity = useless if no way to propose new models ֒ → Strategies for exploration (to find new models) ֒ Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  3. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist ◮ Aim : to model the world → fully unsupervisedly (surprise us !) ֒ ◮ Which world ? Which scale ? → Physics : quantum mech. / Newtonian mech. / relativity ֒ → Chemistry : molecular / material science ֒ → Daily life : constant gravity / solid mech. / heuristics... ֒ ◮ Which criterion ? to assert whether a model is good → Compactness : Kolmogorov complexity, min. descr. length ֒ → Time complexity : crucial and better-posed (computable) : ֒ time needed to detect / recognize / use / apply → All parts in a model should be justified /optimized : ֒ a concept makes sense only with fast recognition/appl. methods → Hierarchical models : intuitive... but justification ? ֒ Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  4. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist (... bis...) ◮ What ? (data observed) → Emergence of patterns at a given scale ? ֒ → Recurrent patterns : ֒ → self-organization → self-replication (life, etc.) → Statistical relevance : frequency, correlations... ֒ ◮ How ? → No restriction to predefined (meta-)models ֒ → Be sure the span of algorithms (models) reachable is not limited ֒ → requires a new way of programming → Stochastic search ? ֒ → not necessarily : e.g. exhaustive deterministic search → not just stochastics : need good laws ( strategies ) → algorithms/models preferred to be reachable first ? → Levin’s measure : 2 − Kolmog ( algo ) → time expectancy before finding suitable model ? → no free lunch ? → Related to : Efficient ways to explore ... mathematics ? to prove ֒ theorems ? to do research as a community ? (or no free lunch !?) Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  5. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling The Artificial Physicist (... ter) ◮ How many suitable models ? → Structure from chaos : ֒ in a randomly-chosen world, given a scale where processes seem to be chaotic, what is the probability to find another scale and an arbitrarily-simple model that fits approximately arbitrarily-well the phenomena ? → i.e. probability of emergence of approximate structure ֒ or, equivalently, of existence of suitable approximate models Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  6. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  7. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World laws of physics interface neural net (e.g.) Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  8. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World sensor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  9. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World sensor actor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  10. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World tool sensor actor Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  11. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World tool Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  12. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Modeling the problem of modeling World Brain Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  13. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Brain ◮ Ergo-systems [Gromov] : structure of the brain ↔ structures in the world understandable by the brain → hence list all mathematical structures, to get clues on a mathematician’s ֒ brain → cf. also M. Galtier’s PhD (NeuroMathComp) ֒ ◮ Expressive power of the brain should be sufficient → approximate Turing machine , provided stability and basic computations ֒ possible → independent of the materials ? of the universe structure/laws ? → cf. game theory : ant colonies, Conway’s game of life : expressivity = ֒ Turing but low efficiency/representation Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  14. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Sensors ◮ In classical machine learning : kernels methods : equivalence choice of the features ↔ choice of the kernel ◮ But here : sensors and brain are of different nature ! (materials, physics...) : no equivalence choice of sensors ↔ choice of information retrieval algorithm ◮ New sensors ? Need actors. Sensor World Brain Any Brain−type Sensor−type material material (neural net) materials feature learning algo. Input Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  15. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Tools ◮ to operate better or to make new sensors, i.e. for new scales/modalities in action/sensing. Think of Human Kind without technology. ◮ by exploiting physical properties of the (external) world ◮ require experiments (to discover these properties) ◮ require analysis & modeling by the brain ◮ Note : tool can be an external brain (with different materials & properties) Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

  16. Introdiscussion Artificial Physicist Meta-modeling Discussion ◮ follows. Guillaume Charpiat Pulsar project - INRIA The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything

Recommend


More recommend