Ten Years of Domoic Acid Surveillance in Stranded Marine Mammals of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ten years of domoic acid surveillance in stranded marine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ten Years of Domoic Acid Surveillance in Stranded Marine Mammals of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ten Years of Domoic Acid Surveillance in Stranded Marine Mammals of Monterey Bay 2009-2019 Bianca Ramirez Introduction and Background The Long Marine Lab Marine Mammal Stranding Network has responded to stranded marine mammals for over 30


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ten Years of Domoic Acid Surveillance in Stranded Marine Mammals of Monterey Bay 2009-2019

Bianca Ramirez

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction and Background

■ The Long Marine Lab Marine Mammal Stranding Network has responded to stranded marine mammals for over 30 years in Central California. ■ 200-250 marine mammals strand per year in Monterey and Santa Cruz counties. ■ Pseudo-nitzschia australis is one species of diatom that produces domoic acid (DA) and is associated with harmful algal blooms (HAB) on the central coast ■ Domoic acid is a neurotoxin and has caused unusual stranding and mortality events in marine mammals since at least 1991 in Central California (Scholin et al.,

2000)

■ Most work on DA focused on live stranded and rehabilitated marine mammals, clinical effects, and often single species.

Pseudo-nitzschia

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

■ To quantify background levels of domoic acid in stranded marine mammals regardless of the cause of death.

To develop a rigorous rubric for assigning cause of death (COD) in dead stranded marine mammals.

Approach

Collected stomach contents, feces, and urine from all fresh dead stranded marine mammals over a ten year period.

Tested for domoic acid and quantified temporal patterns as well as patterns across species

Developed cause of death criteria based on literature, did preliminary analysis

  • f DA levels across COD categories
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methodology and Strategy

Objective 1 ■ 152 animals fresh dead (code 2) or moderately decomposed (code 3) were collected by volunteers and staff – Level-A forms were filled out at the stranding site – Carcasses collected or necropsied fresh ■ Feces, urine, stomach contents were collected and analyzed for DA Objective 2 ■ Criteria for determining COD were developed from the literature and surveying the last ten years of necropsy records ■ Necropsy reports were reviewed by two independent reviewers and assigned a COD

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Results & Discussion:

Objective 1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

C a l i f

  • r

n i a S e a L i

  • n

G u a d a l u p e F u r S e a l E l e p h a n t S e a l H a r b

  • r

S e a l N

  • r

t h e r n F u r S e a l H a r b

  • r

P

  • r

p

  • i

s e B

  • t

t l e n

  • s

e D

  • l

p h i n L

  • n

g

  • b

e a k e d D

  • l

p h i n P a c i f i c W h i t e S i d e d D

  • l

p h i n R i s s

  • D
  • l

p h i n S h

  • r

t

  • b

e a k e d D

  • l

p h i n H u b b s B e a k e d W h a l e H u m p b a c k W h a l e

Number of Animals

Species

DA Presence in Stranded Animals in Central Coast 2009-2019

DA Not Present DA Present

■ DA levels ranged: 0 to 238412.48 ng g-1 ■ 75.7% of animals had DA present in at least one sample ■ 11 of the 13 species collected tested positive for DA. ■ 50% of our study set were California Sea Lions ■ 78.9% of CSLs were positive for DA – Only group to have individuals die from Domoic Acid Toxicity

75.7% 24.3%

Even outside of a known HAB event, background levels of DA in central coast marine mammals is very high.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

■ Preliminary work on COD indicates that there is no correlation between COD and DA levels. ■ Even animals that were killed by human interaction or interspecific trauma had high DA levels.

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Trauma Non-Trauma

Number of Animals

DA Presence in Trauma vs. Non-Trauma Cause of Deaths

DA Not Present DA Present

■ Future work: – Further refine of the COD rubric – Is there seasonality of acute and chronic DA exposure? – Brain analysis to identify chronic vs. acute DA exposure in all fresh dead animals These data indicate that background levels

  • f DA are likely present in most animals

rather than just sick or injured animals.

Results & Discussion:

Objective 2

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Acknowledgements and References

■ Huge thank you to LML Marine Mammal Stranding Volunteers and Stranding Techs (Karolina Wirga, Amber Diluzio, Gavin Houghton) – To my advisor, Robin Dunkin, this project couldn’t have been done without you! –

  • Dr. Raphael Kudela and Kendra Negrey for DA sample analysis

– John H. Prescott Program (grants NA19NMF4390159, NA18NMF4390057, NA17NMF4390093, NA15NMF4390035) ■ Scholin, C. A., Gulland, F., Doucette, G. J., Benson, S., Busman, M., Chavez, F. P., … Van Dolah, F. M. (2000). Mortality of sea lions along the central California coast linked to a toxic diatom bloom. Nature, 403(6765), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/47481