teaching period 2 2015 for10002 introduction to forensic
play

Teaching Period 2, 2015 FOR10002 Introduction to Forensic Science - PDF document

Teaching Period 2, 2015 FOR10002 Introduction to Forensic Science Assessment 3: Poster presentation Word limit: 700 (+/- 10%) with diagrams added and labelled. Weighting: 25% Due date: 9am AEST Monday 14 September (Week 10) Assessment overview


  1. Teaching Period 2, 2015 FOR10002 Introduction to Forensic Science Assessment 3: Poster presentation Word limit: 700 (+/- 10%) with diagrams added and labelled. Weighting: 25% Due date: 9am AEST Monday 14 September (Week 10) Assessment overview This assessment task requires you to submit an academic poster about the forensic application of a modern analytical technique. A poster is a visual display and consists of both diagrams and text; it brings order to a section of information and communicates in a way that is unique to plain text. Assessment details You are to prepare a poster that describes one of the modern analytical techniques listed below:  UV-Visible Spectroscopy.  Infrared Spectroscopy.  Mass Spectroscopy.  High Performance Liquid Chromatography.  Gas Chromatography. Your poster must include: a) an introduction to the technique b) the history of the technique c) a description of how the technique works d) a case study in which the technique has been successfully used e) an account of the limitations of the technique. It should also be correctly referenced and titled. Academic posters while being more visual than a set of text still must adhere to a certain level of structure and rigour in the content and choice of language. We advise that you follow the structure listed above (a-e) when constructing your poster. There are a number of different tools that you might choose to produce your academic poster and they can be found on the how-to guide in the assessment 3 section of Blackboard. 1 FOR10002 Introduction to forensic science

  2. If you are using work form other sources – whether that is a diagram, image, illustration or content- be sure to use correct APA Style referencing in-text and include a reference list with you submission. Submission details Please submit your assignment through Blackboard. More detailed information is available in the Assessment 3 folder in Blackboard. Assessment criteria 1. Originality of connection made between the chosen case and the modern forensic technique 2. Choice of points about the technique presented in the poster 3. Clarity and effectiveness of communication with use of illustrations 4. Format, structure and organisation of ideas, as well as use of APA referencing in-text, for illustrations and in reference list. Your work will be marked according to the following rubric: Criteria No pass Pass Credit Distinction High distinction 70-79% 50-59% 60-69% 80-100% Originality of Did not meet The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation connection made made weak and drew obvious drew interesting poster imaginatively criteria. between the basic connections connections and frequent and critically chosen case and between chosen between chosen connections between chosen the modern case and the case and the between chosen case and the forensic modern forensic modern forensic case and the modern forensic technique technique. technique. modern forensic technique. technique. (30%) Choice of points Did not meet More appropriate The choice of The choice of The team has clearly about the criteria. points from the points were points from the selected pertinent technique reports could mostly relevant reports were points from the presented in the have been used in suitable and well reports to present poster the presentation chosen poster (30%) Clarity and Did not meet The information The information The information The information is effectiveness of criteria. was not occasionally was mostly clear communicated communication communicated required some though more clearly and with use of clearly or clarity. Only one illustrations effectively, using effectively. No illustration was would have been illustrations where illustrations illustrations were provided beneficial appropriate (20%) used 2 FOR10002 Introduction to forensic science

  3. Format, structure Did not meet Links between The work is very Very good Evidence of extensive criterion. introduction and well structured, organisation is planning and and organisation conclusion are giving appropriate evident; the work is preparation. of ideas, as well present; there is emphasis to all cohesive from Extremely well as use of APA some evidence of areas; structural beginning to end; structured, with clear referencing in- argument and devices (language there is a systematic progression in the text, for planning. and paragraphing) and cogent development of ideas illustrations and enhance the work. approach to the and the use of Draws on an in reference list. structure of the supportive exemplars appropriate range References are work. (20%) of sources which successfully Highly sophisticated are made explicit; incorporated into All sources are and persuasive quotations relate to discussion using an acknowledged and expression of ideas. the context in which appropriate blend are presented with Extremely well- they are used; of quotation and meticulous care; written, with great references are paraphrase; references are clarity and maturity of generally cited references are integrated presentation. appropriately using presented successfully making References embedded the APA style. accurately using the accurate use of APA expertly into the flow APA style. style; the balance of of information and quotation and ideas with a well- paraphrase enables managed balance of points to be made paraphrasing and strongly. quotation. Flawless use of APA style for all forms of referencing. 3 FOR10002 Introduction to forensic science

Recommend


More recommend