teaching enhancement project programmed learning to
play

TEACHING ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Programmed learning to replace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TEACHING ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Programmed learning to replace undergraduate lectures. P.Chevins, Life Sciences THE PROBLEM Recall of lecture material poor in revision tutorials. THE SOLUTION Encourage more active learning. Great


  1. TEACHING ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Programmed learning to replace undergraduate lectures. P.Chevins, Life Sciences

  2. THE PROBLEM • Recall of lecture material poor in revision tutorials. THE SOLUTION • Encourage more active learning. • “Great teachers stimulate active, not passive learning…” (National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education, 1997 and Keele L & T Strategy).

  3. THE PLAN • Replace some lectures with prescribed reading. • Follow with weekly formative objective test. • One week later, summative test on the same material. • Compare exam results with new and conventional teaching method.

  4. THE PROGRAMME Year 2 Animal Physiology Module • Weeks 1- 5 Conventional Lectures: Salt Balance, Excretion, Respiration and Cardiovascular Physiology. • Week 6 Intro. To Nerve Physiology. • Week 7 Study Week • Week 8 Formative test (nerves) + questionnaire. Feedback and Intro. To muscle physiology • Week 9 Test 2: nerve (summative) + muscle (formative). Feedback and Intro. to endocrine physiology. • Week 10 Test 3: muscle (summative) + endocrinology (formative). + Feedback • Week 11 Test 4: endocrinology + Feedback

  5. THE RESULTS - OBJECTIVE TESTS 70 60 50 40 % Mean 30 Formative 20 Mean 10 Summative 0 Nerves Muscles Hormones

  6. WEEKLY STUDY HOURS 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 Hours 1.5 1 0.5 0 Nerve Muscle Hormones Formative Summative Study Week

  7. THE RESULTS - QUESTIONNAIRE 23 RESPONDERS OF 24 (Week 1) STUDY TIME • Increased from 1.2 to 3.8 hours per week (mean) WORKLOAD • Just right:12 Too much:11 PART-TIME JOB? • 9 out of 23: mean 10.2 hours weekly

  8. THE RESULTS - EXAMINATIONS Year Comparison of Examination Marks by Topic 70 60 50 40 Question Score (%) 1997 30 1998 1999 20 2000 10 2001 2002 0 Nerve & Muscle Endocrinology Salt Balance Respiration & Comparative Module mark & Excretion Circulation Physiology Topic

  9. THE RESULTS - EXAMINATIONS Mean Exam Topic Marks Adjusted for Overall Module Score 120 100 80 1997 Mean Mark as Percent of 60 1998 Module Score 1999 2000 2001 40 2002 20 0 Nerve & Muscle Endocrinology Salt Balance & Respiration & Comparative Module mark Excretion Circulation Examination Essay Topic p = 0.06 (Student’s t)

  10. EXAMINATIONS - QUESTION CHOICE Question Choices 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 Nerve & Muscle Endocrine Salt Balance & Excretion Respiration & Circulation

  11. CONCLUSIONS and PLANS • The experiment was a qualified success. • Administer tests by CAA in future. • Formative tests on module web pages. • Use web discussion to provide student learning support. • Thanks to Keele Teaching Enhancement Fund and to LTSN Bioscience for financial support.

Recommend


More recommend