teacher evaluation
play

Teacher Evaluation Training for Teachers & Administrators Thank - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Article 10 Teacher Evaluation Training for Teachers & Administrators Thank you to the PEA and PUSD Bargaining Teams and the Evaluation Committee for years of collaborative work to develop a fair, equitable, and standards-based evaluation


  1. Article 10 Teacher Evaluation Training for Teachers & Administrators

  2. Thank you to the PEA and PUSD Bargaining Teams and the Evaluation Committee for years of collaborative work to develop a fair, equitable, and standards-based evaluation tool. Beginning the 2015-16 school year, all staff will be evaluated using the electronic evaluation format, Evaluat'd. 2

  3.  Improve quality of education in the district  Facilitate professionals’ growth and development  Provide objective assessment of all educators regardless of school site  Based on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (2009 CSTP)  NOT used as a substitute fo r discipline or for retaliation Review Article 10.1 3

  4. Permanent Certificated – Once every other year Preschool – Annually first three (3) years, then every other year Probationary and Temporary – every year Re Revi view ew Ar Article cle 10 10.2 4

  5. Article 10.5 The four (4) types of evaluations are: a) The “Administrative—Mandated” b) The “Partner Collaboration” c) The “Self - Evaluation” d) The “Administrative—Choice” 5

  6.  Yea ear r On One e – Ad Admi minis nistrative trative Ma Mand ndate ted d Evaluat Ev luatio ion  Year Two – No Evaluation  Year Three – Choice Year: ◦ Partner Collaboration, Self-Assessment, or Administrative — Choice Evaluation  Year Four – No Evaluation Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.4 6

  7. By October 1- Unit Members shall be given written notice that they will be evaluated this school year (If employed after the start of the school year, unit member shall be given written notice within 30 calendar days of their beginning date of service.) Review Article 10.6 (See Form 1) 7

  8.  Completed by site administrator or designee  Administrator evaluates Unit Member on 3 California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) 1. One Standard Chosen by Unit Member 2. One Standard Chosen by Administrator 3. Everyone – Standard 6 Review Article 10.6 8

  9. Ini nitial tial Confe nference rence The initial conference shall be held no sooner than the 16 th instructional day and no later than October 31. Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.6.2 .2 9

  10. Wha hat t ha happ ppens ens at the he Initia nitial l Confer nferenc ence? e?  Selection of Standards (one by teacher, one by administrator)  Review and discuss Standard 6  Agreement on date of 1 st Scheduled observation (if not agreed at conference, then agreement must be made before Preliminary Evaluation Summary is due)  Completion of Initial Conference Form (See Form 2) 10

  11. Ob Obse servatio rvations ns:  Evaluators must be administrators  No more than 2 observers at any one time  First observation shall be scheduled  Additional scheduled or unscheduled observations are at the discretion of administrator Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.6.2. .2.3 11

  12. Ob Obse servation rvations s (c (cont.): nt.):  Upon request of unit member, an additional observation must occur if unit member has not met 2 of the 3 selected standards; administrator must notify unit member of the observation date in advance 12

  13. Ob Obse servatio rvations ns (cont nt.): .):  All observations must be at least 25 minutes in length  Scheduled observations are by mutual agreement  Formal observation shall occur at least 5 calendars days apart unless agreed otherwise by unit member  Post observation conference must be scheduled within 10 work days following observation (See Form 3) 13

  14. What is Ev Evalu luation ation Ev Evid idence ence? “Evidence” shall be the data supporting a rating by an Evaluator of a unit member on the approved observation and evaluation forms. The authorized components of data to validate the CSTP include: Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.6.2. .2.4.2 4.2 14

  15. Ev Evaluatio luation n Ratings ings There are four possible ratings on each objective: Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory Exceeds Standards Rev eview iew Ar Article icles s 10.6.3 .3 – 10.6.3 .3.6 .6 15

  16. Pr Preli liminary minary Eva valuat luation ion Summar ary y For temporary and probationary employees – must be completed by December 15 For permanent employees – must be completed by January 31 Permanent employees who meet the standards on the preliminary evaluation summary shall not undergo continued evaluation for the balance of that school year; thus the Preliminary Evaluation Summary becomes the Final Evaluation Summary. Re Review ew Articl cle e 10 10.6. 6.4 16

  17. Fin inal l Ev Evalua luatio tion n Sum ummary mary  Unit member must receive 30 calendar days before the last scheduled school day on the District adopted calendar  Objectives & standards are rated  Discuss areas of agreement/ disagreement  Identify future objectives Rev eview iew Ar Article icle 10.6.5 .5 (See Form 4) 17

  18. Fin inal l Ev Evalua luati tion n Sum ummary mary (c (cont nt.) .)  Within 10 work days of completing Final Evaluation Summary, evaluator shall give a copy to unit member  Unit member may attach a written response or rebuttal  Final evaluation shall be turned into the Human Resources Office by June 30 of the evaluation year 18

  19. What happens if the overall rating is “Meets S tandards”?  The Four-Year Evaluation Cycle shall continue as long as a rating of “Meets Standards” (10.6.3.2) is received during each Administrative — Mandated Evaluation. 19

  20. What happens if the overall rating is “Does Not M eet Standards”?  Permanent Unit Members who “Do Not Meet S tandards” on evaluation shall be evaluated every year until standards are met. 20

  21.  Written notice shall be given to a unit member who does not meet at least 2 of the 3 standards. The notice shall include:  Areas that need improvement in relation to the CSTP  Specific objectives in relation to CSTP  Methods and Resources available  What specifically will be provided for unit member  PAR may be an option Note: Voluntary Assistance may be requested Revi view w Articl cle e 10.7.3 3 21

  22.  10.12.3 – Unit members shall receive a printed copy of the evaluation forms, if requested.  10.12.4-A unit member electing not to provide an electronic signature shall inform the evaluator they elect to by-pass the electronic signature. The unit member and evaluator shall each manually sign a printed form each time a unit member elects to not provide an electronic signature. 22

  23.  10.13.1 – No recording, closed-circuit t.v., eavesdropping, etc. shall be part of evaluation observation  10.13.2 – Within 10 work days of preparing the final evaluation summary a copy shall be given to the employee  Employee has 10 work days to attach a written response 23

  24.  10.13.3 – No evaluation shall interfere with normal teaching/learning  Employees shall not be evaluated based on religious beliefs or political beliefs, unless the exercise of those beliefs violate local, state or federal laws Revi view ew Ar Article icles s 10.13. 3.4 4 – 10.13.6 .6 24

  25.  10.13.7 – Standardized test scores shall not be used as evaluation data  10.13.9 – Timelines may be extended by mutual agreement  10.13.10 – After 4 years, an employee can request a review and removal of derogatory materials in files. If Superintendent disagrees, then he/she must give written statement and reasons for this action. 25

  26. 10.12.1 – Evaluatee’s signature does not denote agreement 10.12.2 – No statement shall be added to an evaluation that was not previously given to the employee 26

  27.  If you disagree with the overall evaluation rating, you may request a review by the Superintendent or his/her designee  Review must occur within 30 days of the request being received Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.10.1 0.1 27

  28.  Year One – Administrative Mandated Evaluation  Year Two – No Evaluation  Year r Thr hree e – Cho hoice ice Year r ◦ Partne ner r Coll llaborati ation, n, Se Self lf-Assessmen ssessment, t, or Admin inistra istrative tive — Choi Choice ce Ev Evalu luation tion  Year Four – No Evaluation Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.4 28

  29. Permanent unit members in year 3 of the 4-year cycle shall choose one of these options: 1. “Partner Collaboration” 2. “Self - Evaluation” 3. “Administrative—Choice” Revi view ew Ar Article icle 10.8 (See Form 1) 29

  30. Unit member shall:  Select a partner (permanent teacher) who also has a “Meets Standards” on his/her previous evaluation and notify administrator  Choose two CSTP standards  Complete all required forms  Attend Initial Conference and participate in at least 2 collaborative meetings with partner  Submit evaluation plan and summary forms to administrator Administrator shall receive and read plan and forms, then submit to Human Resources Dept. Re Review ew Articl cle e 10 10.8. 8.2 (See Forms 5 & 6) 30

Recommend


More recommend