symmetric coverings and the bruck ryser chowla theorem
play

Symmetric coverings and the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem Daniel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Symmetric coverings and the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem Daniel Horsley (Monash University, Australia) Joint work with Darryn Bryant, Melinda Buchanan, Barbara Maenhaut and Victor Scharaschkin and with Nevena Franceti c and Sara Herke Part


  1. Symmetric coverings and the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem Daniel Horsley (Monash University, Australia) Joint work with Darryn Bryant, Melinda Buchanan, Barbara Maenhaut and Victor Scharaschkin and with Nevena Franceti´ c and Sara Herke

  2. Part 1: The Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem

  3. Symmetric designs

  4. Symmetric designs 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 7 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 6 3 1 6 2 7 3 1 7 1 5 4 4 2 A symmetric ( 7 , 4 , 2 ) -design

  5. Symmetric designs 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 7 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 6 3 1 6 2 7 3 1 7 1 5 4 4 2 A symmetric ( 7 , 4 , 2 ) -design A ( v , k , λ ) -design is a set of v points and a collection of k -sets of points ( blocks ), such that any two points occur together in exactly λ blocks.

  6. Symmetric designs 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 7 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 6 3 1 6 2 7 3 1 7 1 5 4 4 2 A symmetric ( 7 , 4 , 2 ) -design A ( v , k , λ ) -design is a set of v points and a collection of k -sets of points ( blocks ), such that any two points occur together in exactly λ blocks. A ( v , k , λ ) -design is symmetric if it has exactly v blocks.

  7. Symmetric designs 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 7 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 6 3 1 6 2 7 3 1 7 1 5 4 4 2 A symmetric ( 7 , 4 , 2 ) -design A ( v , k , λ ) -design is a set of v points and a collection of k -sets of points ( blocks ), such that any two points occur together in exactly λ blocks. A ( v , k , λ ) -design is symmetric if it has exactly v blocks. Famous examples include finite projective planes and Hadamard designs.

  8. Symmetric designs 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 7 2 5 3 6 4 7 5 4 5 5 6 6 7 6 3 1 6 2 7 3 1 7 1 5 4 4 2 A symmetric ( 7 , 4 , 2 ) -design A ( v , k , λ ) -design is a set of v points and a collection of k -sets of points ( blocks ), such that any two points occur together in exactly λ blocks. A ( v , k , λ ) -design is symmetric if it has exactly v blocks. Famous examples include finite projective planes and Hadamard designs. A symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design has v = k ( k − 1 ) + 1. λ

  9. The BRC theorem

  10. The BRC theorem Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (1950) If a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design exists then ◮ if v is even, then k − λ is square; and ◮ if v is odd, then x 2 = ( k − λ ) y 2 + ( − 1 ) ( v − 1 ) / 2 λ z 2 has a solution for integers x , y , z , not all zero.

  11. The BRC theorem Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (1950) If a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design exists then ◮ if v is even, then k − λ is square; and ◮ if v is odd, then x 2 = ( k − λ ) y 2 + ( − 1 ) ( v − 1 ) / 2 λ z 2 has a solution for integers x , y , z , not all zero.

  12. The BRC theorem Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (1950) If a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design exists then ◮ if v is even, then k − λ is square; and ◮ if v is odd, then x 2 = ( k − λ ) y 2 + ( − 1 ) ( v − 1 ) / 2 λ z 2 has a solution for integers x , y , z , not all zero. ◮ This is the only general nonexistence result known for symmetric designs.

  13. The BRC theorem Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (1950) If a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design exists then ◮ if v is even, then k − λ is square; and ◮ if v is odd, then x 2 = ( k − λ ) y 2 + ( − 1 ) ( v − 1 ) / 2 λ z 2 has a solution for integers x , y , z , not all zero. ◮ This is the only general nonexistence result known for symmetric designs. ◮ In 1991 Lam, Thiel and Swiercz proved there is no ( 111 , 11 , 1 ) -design using heavy computation.

  14. The BRC theorem Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (1950) If a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design exists then ◮ if v is even, then k − λ is square; and ◮ if v is odd, then x 2 = ( k − λ ) y 2 + ( − 1 ) ( v − 1 ) / 2 λ z 2 has a solution for integers x , y , z , not all zero. ◮ This is the only general nonexistence result known for symmetric designs. ◮ In 1991 Lam, Thiel and Swiercz proved there is no ( 111 , 11 , 1 ) -design using heavy computation.

  15. BRC proof

  16. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.

  17. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0              

  18. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise. b 1       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0              

  19. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise. b 2       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0              

  20. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0              

  21. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0               The inner product of two distinct rows is λ .

  22. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0             point x 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   The inner product of two distinct rows is λ .

  23. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0             point x 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   The inner product of two distinct rows is λ .

  24. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0             point x 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   The inner product of two distinct rows is λ . The inner product of a row with itself is k = λ ( v − 1 ) k − 1 .

  25. BRC proof The incidence matrix M of a symmetric ( v , k , λ ) -design is a v × v matrix whose ( i , j ) entry is 1 if point i is in block j and 0 otherwise.       point x 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0             point x 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   The inner product of two distinct rows is λ . The inner product of a row with itself is k = λ ( v − 1 ) k − 1 .

  26. BRC proof

  27. BRC proof If M is the incidence matrix of a symmetric design, then MM T looks like k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ   λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ   k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    k  λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     k . λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ   k  λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ     k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ

  28. BRC proof If M is the incidence matrix of a symmetric design, then MM T looks like k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ   λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ   k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    k  λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     k . λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ λ λ   k  λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ    λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ λ λ     k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ     λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ k λ k λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ The BRC theorem can be proved by observing that

Recommend


More recommend