Summary of this work p We study the hydrogen line emission from SNR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

summary of this work
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Summary of this work p We study the hydrogen line emission from SNR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On On modeling of hydrogen line emission fr from supernova remnant shocks: the effect of of Lyman an line trap apping


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • On

On modeling of hydrogen line emission fr from supernova remnant shocks: the effect

  • f
  • f Lyman

an line trap apping

Jiro Shimoda1

  • 1. Tohoku Univ.
  • Acknowledgements: Makito Abe1, Kazuyuki Omukai1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary of this work

pWe study the hydrogen line emission from SNR shocks including the effects of Lyman line trapping. pWe find that the Ha emission can be mildly absorbed by hydrogen atoms in the 2s state at the realistic SNRs. pOur calculation will explain the anomalous width

  • f Ha line with no cosmic-ray.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Balmer line emissions (especially Hα) are ubiquitously seen in collisionless shocks propagating into the ISM.

Winkler+14 Smith 97 Figures from Morlino+15

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

Supernova Remnants (SNRs)

Balmer line emissions (especially Hα) are ubiquitously seen in collisionless shocks propagating into the ISM.

Winkler+14 Smith 97

Hereafter, we focus on the

  • SNRs. (although
  • ur study is

applicable to other

  • bjects)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

Spectrum of Balmer line Emissions (Ghavamian+02, for SNR SN 1006) The lines consist of “narrow” and ”broad” components.

narrow broad

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

ü Emission Mechanism (e.g. Chevalier+80)

  • The collisionless shock is

formed by the interaction between charged particles and plasma waves rather than Coulomb collision.

  • The neutral particles (e.g.

hydrogen atoms) are not affected.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

ü Emission Mechanism (e.g. Chevalier+80)

H + p (or e) → H* + p (or e) H + p → p + H*

p Collisional Excitation p Charge Transfer

Emits “narrow” comp. Emits “broad” comp.

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Balmer Line Emissions from Collisionless Shocks

ü Emission Mechanism (e.g. Chevalier+80)

H + p (or e) → H* + p (or e) H + p → p + H*

p Collisional Excitation p Charge Transfer

Emits “narrow” comp. Emits “broad” comp.

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

ü The width of “narrow” reflects the upstream temperature of hydrogen atoms. ü The width of “broad” reflects the downstream proton temperature.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The width of narrow is “too broad”

SNR Shock velocity Narrow component (km s−1) FWHM (km s−1) Cygnus Loop 300−400 28−35 RCW 86 SW 580−660 32 ± 2 RCW 86 W 580−660 32 ± 5 RCW 86 NW 580−660 40 ± 2 Kepler D49 & D50 2000−2500 42 ± 3 0505-67.9 440−880 32−43 0548-70.4 700−950 32−58 0519-69.0 1100−1500 39−42 0509-67.5 − 25−31 Tycho 1940−2300 44 ± 4 SN 1006 2890 ± 100 21 ± 3

Sollerman+2003 ü The width of narrow component is in the 30-50 km/s range (equivalently, 2.5-5.6 eV). ü If these were the ISM equilibrium temperatures, then all of hydrogen atoms would be completely ionized! 1 eV ←→ 21 km/s

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The width of narrow is “too broad”

SNR Shock velocity Narrow component (km s−1) FWHM (km s−1) Cygnus Loop 300−400 28−35 RCW 86 SW 580−660 32 ± 2 RCW 86 W 580−660 32 ± 5 RCW 86 NW 580−660 40 ± 2 Kepler D49 & D50 2000−2500 42 ± 3 0505-67.9 440−880 32−43 0548-70.4 700−950 32−58 0519-69.0 1100−1500 39−42 0509-67.5 − 25−31 Tycho 1940−2300 44 ± 4 SN 1006 2890 ± 100 21 ± 3

Sollerman+2003 ü The width of narrow component is in the 30-50 km/s range (equivalently, 2.5-5.6 eV). ü If this were the ISM equilibrium temperature, then all

  • f hydrogen atoms

would be completely ionized!

ü The anomalous width of narrow component implies a pre-shock heating

  • f the upstream hydrogen atoms at the

vicinity of the shock (e.g. Smith+94).

1 eV ←→ 21 km/s

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Possible upstream heating: (i) neutral precursor

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

H + p → p + H*

p Charge Transfer ü A part of downstream hydrogen atoms can be back to the upstream region (e.g. Smith+94). ü The leaking hydrogen can deposit some energy flux to the upstream fluid via several atomic/plasma processes.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Possible upstream heating: (i) neutral precursor

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

H + p/e → p + e + p/e

p Ionization of fast neutrals

H + p → p + H*

p Charge Transfer heat up

Emits the anomalous narrow component with the width of 30-50 km/s

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Possible upstream heating: (i) neutral precursor

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

H + p/e → p + e + p/e

p Ionization of fast neutrals

H + p → p + H*

p Charge Transfer heat up

Emits the anomalous narrow component with the width of 30-50 km/s

ü Smith+94 doubted that there is enough time for the heating until the fast protons swept up by the shock again. ü The neutral precursor scenario has been studied in the literatures: e.g. Blasi+12; Ohira 12, 13, 14, 16; Morlino+12, 13. ü Recent hybrid simulations suggested no significant broadening (Ohira 16).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Possible upstream heating: (ii) cosmic-ray precursor

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

CRs The CRs accelerating via DSA mechanism can also affect the upstream plasma (or can generate Alfvenic turbulence in the upstream region). The formation of the anomalous narrow component is similar to the neutral precursor case. heat up

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Possible upstream heating: (ii) cosmic-ray precursor

  • H

p e

upstream downstream SNR!shock!

  • Charged particles → shock heating

Hydrogen atoms → no dissipation

CRs The CRs accelerating via DSA mechanism can also affect the upstream plasma (or can generate Alfvenic turbulence in the upstream region). The formation of the anomalous narrow component is similar to the neutral precursor case. heat up

ü Morlino+13 provided the Ha emission model based on this CR-precursor scenario. ü Their model is now accepted as ”the standard model” of the Ha emission from the SNR shocks.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Possible upstream heating: (ii) cosmic-ray precursor

10-2 10-1 100

  • 100
  • 50

50 100 Hα emissivity vx [km/s] Vsh= 4000 km/s n0 = 0.1 cm-3 pmax = 50 TeV/c no CR ξinj= 3.5; ηTH= 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8

The semi-analytical model predicts the anomalous narrow component arising from the CR precursor (Morlino+13).

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Possible upstream heating: (ii) cosmic-ray precursor

20 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 pmax [TeV/c] ηTH= 0.8

Maximum Energy of CRs [TeV/c] FWHM of narrow [km/s]

FWHM of the narrow component depends on the Maximum energy of CRs (Morlino+13).

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Possible upstream heating: (ii) cosmic-ray precursor

20 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 pmax [TeV/c] ηTH= 0.8

Maximum Energy of CRs [TeV/c] FWHM of narrow [km/s]

FWHM of the narrow component depends on the Maximum energy of CRs (Morlino+13).

ü This model does not sufficiently include the effects of Lyman line trapping.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lyman line trapping Lyβ→Hα

Lyb absorbed reemitted Ha Ha 3p → 2s Ha is not absorbed by the hydrogen atoms in ground state. Lyb 3p → 1s a) A part of hydrogen atoms in n=3 emit Lyb due to 3p to 1s transition. b) The emitted Lyb is is ab absorbed by the hydrogen atoms in in ground state. c) Ev Eventually, Lyb is is converted to Ha due due to 3p p to 2s trans nsition.

Optically thin for Lyb is “Case A” Optically thick for Lyb is “Case B”

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lyman line trapping Lyβ→Hα

Lyb absorbed reemitted Ha Ha 3p → 2s Ha is not absorbed by the hydrogen atoms in ground state. Lyb 3p → 1s

When the SNR shocks are in Case B, the efficient conversion of Lyb to Ha yields “2s” hydrogen atoms, which absorb the Ha photons.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Optical thickness of Ha in the realistic SNR shocks

p The number density of “2s” hydrogen atoms:

A2s,1s ≈ 8.2 s−1

p Optical thickness of the Ha photons:

Spontaneous transition rate:

≈ C1s,2s ∼ 10−7-10−6 s−1

  • Collisional excitation rate:

nH(2s) nH(1s)C1s,2s A2s,1s ∼ 10−8-10−7 × nH(1s)

∼ τ ∼ σνnH(2s)L 0.1

  • nH(2s)

10−7 cm−3 L 1018 cm

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Optical thickness of Ha in the realistic SNR shocks

p The number density of “2s” hydrogen atoms:

A2s,1s ≈ 8.2 s−1

p Optical thickness of the Ha photons:

Spontaneous transition rate:

≈ C1s,2s ∼ 10−7-10−6 s−1

  • Collisional excitation rate:

nH(2s) nH(1s)C1s,2s A2s,1s ∼ 10−8-10−7 × nH(1s)

∼ τ ∼ σνnH(2s)L 0.1

  • nH(2s)

10−7 cm−3 L 1018 cm

  • üThe Ha photons can be

absorbed in the realistic SNR shocks.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Line shapes

Narrow line for Optically thin case Narrow line for Optically thick case

Efficient absorption around the line center Modest absorption far from the line center

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Line shapes

Narrow line for Optically thin case Narrow line for Optically thick case

Efficient absorption around the line center Modest absorption far from the line center

üThe line width of Ha can be broaden with increasing the

  • ptical thickness.
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Line shapes

Narrow line for Optically thin case Narrow line for Optically thick case

Efficient absorption around the line center Modest absorption far from the line center

ü Morlino+13 considered “Case B”. ü They neglected the production of “2s” hydrogen atoms. ü We are now constructing the emission model including the radiative line transfer.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Emission model (preliminary)

  • 1. Rate equation for the statistical equilibrium

: the number density of hydrogen atom at the state k

  • k

[nH(k) (Pk,j + Ck,j) − nH(j) (Pj,k + Cj,k)] = 0,

[nH(k) (

) (Pk,j: the radiative transition rate for k to j + Ck,j)

: the collisional rate for k to j

Here, we only consider the collisional rate from 1s because the mean collision time is very longer than the radiative decay time.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Emission model (preliminary)

  • 1. Rate equation for the statistical equilibrium

Pk,j = Ak,j + gj gk 4πσν hν Jνdν, Pj,k = 4πσν hν Jνdν,

Jν = 1 4π

  • IνdΩ,

In order to evaluate the radiative rate, we need to calculate the mean intensity Jn , that is, the specific intensity In .

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Emission model (preliminary)

pAs the first step, we consider the radiative line transfer and the atomic population problem for the plane parallel shock.

x

Shock (x = 0) upstream downstream Outer boundary Inner boundary

z

1016 cm 5x1016 cm Fully ionized

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Emission model (preliminary)

pAs the first step, we consider the radiative line transfer and the atomic population problem for the plane parallel shock.

x

Shock (x = 0) upstream downstream Outer boundary Inner boundary

z

1016 cm 5x1016 cm Fully ionized

ü We assume the axial symmetry. ü Setting the distribution function of particles, then we can derive the population of atomic states for 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 3d, 4s, 4p, 4d and 4f.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

distribution functions @ shock rest

upstream: shifted Maxwellian with temperature T0 = 1 eV and bulk velocity Vsh ≈ 2000 km/s with assuming the temperature equilibrium.

fH,0(vH) = nH,0 mH 2πkT0 3/2 exp

  • −mH (vH − Vsh)2

2kT0

  • fp,0(vp)

= np,0 mp 2πkT0 3/2 exp

  • −mp (vp − Vsh)2

2kT0

  • fe,0(ve)

= ne,0

  • me

2πkT0 3/2 exp

  • −me (ve − Vsh)2

2kT0

  • nH,0 = np,0
slide-31
SLIDE 31

distribution functions @ shock rest

downstream:

fH,2(vH) = nH,0ξn mH 2πkT0 3/2 exp

  • −mH (vH − Vsh)2

2kT0

  • +

nH,0ξb

  • mH

2πkTp,2 3/2 exp

  • −mH (vH − u2)2

2kTp,2

  • fp,2(vp)

= np,2

  • mp

2πkTp,2 3/2 exp

  • −mp (vp − u2)2

2kTp,2

  • fe,2(ve)

= ne,2

  • me

2πkTe,2 3/2 exp

  • −me (ve − u2)2

2kTe,2

  • ξn = 0.3, ξb = 0.7, Te,2 = 0.05Tp,2
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Plane parallel → Spherical Shell

SNR shell with radius 3pc z Observer adapt

Fully ionized

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Plane parallel → Spherical Shell

SNR shell z Observer adapt

ü We synthetically observed the line emissions from spherical shell based

  • n the calculation of atomic

population.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Observed Spectrum

nH,0 = 0.025 cm-3 nH,0 = 1.500 cm-3 nH,0 = 2.500 cm-3 nH,0 = 4.500 cm-3

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

  • 40
  • 20

20 40 Intensity [a.u.] hydrogen velocity [km s-1] 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

  • 40
  • 20

20 40 Intensity [a.u.] hydrogen velocity [km s-1]

Hb Ha

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FWHM: vs. Observations (Ha)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 2 3 4 5 FWHM [km s-1] nH,0 [cm-3] Ha Hb

SNR Shock velocity Narrow component (km s−1) FWHM (km s−1) Cygnus Loop 300−400 28−35 RCW 86 SW 580−660 32 ± 2 RCW 86 W 580−660 32 ± 5 RCW 86 NW 580−660 40 ± 2 Kepler D49 & D50 2000−2500 42 ± 3 0505-67.9 440−880 32−43 0548-70.4 700−950 32−58 0519-69.0 1100−1500 39−42 0509-67.5 − 25−31 Tycho 1940−2300 44 ± 4 SN 1006 2890 ± 100 21 ± 3

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FWHM: vs. Observations (Ha)

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 2 3 4 5 FWHM [km s-1] nH,0 [cm-3] Ha Hb

The anomalous narrow component comes from the atomic processes without CR acceleration!

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Summary of this work

pWe study the hydrogen line emission from SNR shocks including the effects of Lyman line trapping. pWe find that the Ha emission can be mildly absorbed by hydrogen atoms in the 2s state at the realistic SNRs. pOur calculation will explain the anomalous width

  • f Ha line with no cosmic-ray.