street fighting mathematics for everyone
play

Street-fighting mathematics for everyone Sanjoy Mahajan Olin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Street-fighting mathematics for everyone Sanjoy Mahajan Olin College of Engineering streetfightingmath.com sanjoy@olin.edu 21st Century Mathematics, Stockholm, 24 April 2013 Students can solve problems they dont understand Write a story


  1. Street-fighting mathematics for everyone Sanjoy Mahajan Olin College of Engineering streetfightingmath.com sanjoy@olin.edu 21st Century Mathematics, Stockholm, 24 April 2013

  2. Students can solve problems they don’t understand Write a story problem for 6 × 3 =

  3. Students can solve problems they don’t understand Write a story problem for 6 × 3 = Most common answer type in 4th and 5th grades: There were six ducks swimming in a pond. Then a while later three more ducks come so how many are there? Six times three is eighteen. That’s the answer. Grade 4 37% Grade 5 44%

  4. Students can solve problems they don’t understand There are 26 sheep and 10 goats on a ship. How old is the captain?

  5. Students can solve problems they don’t understand There are 26 sheep and 10 goats on a ship. How old is the captain? 36

  6. Rote learning is the result of most education. Instead, teach street-fighting reasoning 1. Rote learning and its consequence 2. Street-fighting tools a. lumping b. comparing

  7. Students divide without understanding An army bus holds 36 soldiers. If 1128 soldiers are being bused to their training site, how many buses are needed?

  8. Students divide without understanding An army bus holds 36 soldiers. If 1128 soldiers are being bused to their training site, how many buses are needed? incorrect division 30% All students 31 23% 70% divided 1128/36 18% 32 correctly 29% 31 R 12

  9. Using a calculator harmed students’ performance An army bus holds 36 soldiers. If 1128 soldiers are being bused to their training site, how many buses are needed? calculator paper/pencil right 18 ( 7.2 %) 59 ( 23.6 %) wrong 232 191

  10. Using a calculator harmed students’ performance An army bus holds 36 soldiers. If 1128 soldiers are being bused to their training site, how many buses are needed? calculator paper/pencil right 18 ( 7.2 %) 59 ( 23.6 %) wrong 232 191 P ( calculator helped or did no harm | data ) ≈ 10 − 7 .

  11. Students need to turn on their minds, not their calculator Estimate 3.04 × 5.3 1.6 16 160 1600 No answer

  12. Students need to turn on their minds, not their calculator Estimate 3.04 × 5.3 Age 13 1.6 28 % 16 21 160 18 1600 23 No answer 9

  13. Students need to turn on their minds, not their calculator Estimate 3.04 × 5.3 Age 13 Age 17 1.6 28 % 21 % 16 21 37 160 18 17 1600 23 11 No answer 9 12

  14. Rote learning happens at all educational levels ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k � 7 Is ln 7 ! greater than or less than ln k dk ? 1

  15. Rote learning happens at all educational levels ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k � 7 Is ln 7 ! greater than or less than ln k dk ? 1

  16. Rote learning happens at all educational levels Students reasoned using only numerical calculation: � 7 7 � ln k dk = k ln k − k 1 ≈ 7.62. � � 1 7 � ln 7 ! = ln k ≈ 8.52. 1 8.52 > 7.62 � �� � � �� � � �

  17. Rote learning combines the worst of human and computer thinking human chess computer chess 10 8 positions/second calculation 1 position/second fantastic minimal judgment

  18. Rote learning combines the worst of human and computer thinking human chess computer chess 10 8 positions/second calculation 1 position/second fantastic minimal judgment

  19. Rote learning is the result of most education. Instead, teach street-fighting reasoning 1. Rote learning and its consequence 2. Street-fighting tools a. lumping b. comparing

  20. Street fighting is the pragmatic opposite of rigor Freely, and legally, available from MIT Press—with freedom to modify or redistribute MIT Press, 2010

  21. Street fighting is the pragmatic opposite of rigor Rigor

  22. Street fighting is the pragmatic opposite of rigor Rigor mortis

  23. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping Every number is of the form:   one  × 10 n , or  few where few 2 = 10.

  24. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping How many seconds in a year? 365 days × 24 hours × 3600 seconds year day hour

  25. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping How many seconds in a year? few × 10 2 days × 24 hours × 3600 seconds year day hour

  26. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping How many seconds in a year? few × 10 2 days × few × 10 1 hours × 3600 seconds year day hour

  27. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping How many seconds in a year? few × 10 2 days × few × 10 1 hours × few × 10 3 seconds year day hour

  28. Street-fighting tool 1: Simplify using lumping How many seconds in a year? few × 10 2 days × few × 10 1 hours × few × 10 3 seconds year day hour ∼ few × 10 7 seconds year

  29. Lumping also works on graphs

  30. Pictures explain most of Stirling’s formula for n ! ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k � n ln n ! ≈ ln k dk = n ln n − n + 1 ; 1 n ! ≈ e × n n /e n .

  31. The protrusions are the underestimate ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k

  32. Each protrusion is almost a triangle ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k

  33. Doubling each triangle makes them easier to add ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k

  34. The doubled triangles stack nicely ln k ln 7 2 ln 6 ln 5 ln 4 ln 3 1 ln 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k Sum of doubled triangles = ln n

  35. The integral along with the triangles explain most pieces of Stirling’s formula for n ! n � ln n ! = ln k 1 1 n ln n − n + 1 + 2 ln n ≈ � �� � � �� � ln k ln k ln 7 ln 7 2 2 ln 6 ln 6 ln 5 ln 5 ln 4 ln 4 ln 3 ln 3 1 1 ln 2 ln 2 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 k k n n /e n × √ n n ! ≈ e × ���� √ should be 2π

  36. Rote learning is the result of most education. Instead, teach street-fighting reasoning 1. Rote learning and its consequence 2. Street-fighting tools a. lumping b. comparing

  37. Hard problems demand more street-fighting methods What is the fuel efficiency of a 747?

  38. The rote method is hopelessly difficult Equations of fluid mechanics ∂ v ∂t + ( v · ∇ ) v = − 1 ∇ p + ν ∇ 2 v ρ ∇ · v = 0 where ρ = air density p = pressure v = velocity ν = (kinematic) viscosity t = time

  39. Pull out street-fighting tool 2: Proportional reasoning v big v small What is the approximate ratio of the fall speeds v big /v small ? a. 2 : 1 b. 1 : 1 c. 1 : 2

  40. Pull out street-fighting tool 2: Proportional reasoning v big v small What is the approximate ratio of the fall speeds v big /v small ? a. 2 : 1 b. 1 : 1 Drag force is proportional to area! c. 1 : 2

  41. We need a short interlude with a symmetry principle ∼ × density ? speed ? viscosity ? drag force area ���� � �� � � �� � meters 2 kilograms × meters kilograms second 2 meter × second 2

  42. We need a short interlude with a symmetry principle ∼ × speed ? viscosity ? drag force area density × ���� � �� � � �� � � �� � meters 2 kilograms × meters kilograms meters 2 second 2 meter 3 second 2

  43. We need a short interlude with a symmetry principle × speed 2 ∼ drag force area density × ���� � �� � � �� � � �� � meters 2 kilograms × meters kilograms meters 2 second 2 meter 3 second 2

  44. Return to proportional reasoning Fuel consumption is proportional to the drag force, and drag force ∼ area × density × speed 2 . The ratio of plane-to-car fuel consumptions is therefore speed 2 density plane area plane plane consumption plane ∼ × × speed 2 car consumption area car density car car � �� � � �� � � �� � ? ? ?

  45. Return to proportional reasoning Fuel consumption is proportional to the drag force, and drag force ∼ area × density × speed 2 . The ratio of plane-to-car fuel consumptions is therefore speed 2 density plane area plane plane consumption plane ∼ × × speed 2 car consumption area car density car car � �� � � �� � � �� � 10 ? ?

  46. Return to proportional reasoning Fuel consumption is proportional to the drag force, and drag force ∼ area × density × speed 2 . The ratio of plane-to-car fuel consumptions is therefore speed 2 density plane area plane plane consumption plane ∼ × × speed 2 car consumption area car density car car � �� � � �� � � �� � 10 1/3 ?

  47. Return to proportional reasoning Fuel consumption is proportional to the drag force, and drag force ∼ area × density × speed 2 . The ratio of plane-to-car fuel consumptions is therefore speed 2 density plane area plane plane consumption plane ∼ × × speed 2 car consumption area car density car car � �� � � �� � � �� � 10 1/3 100

Recommend


More recommend