stochastic cosmological background study with 3g
play

Stochastic Cosmological Background Study with 3G Gravitational Wave - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stochastic Cosmological Background Study with 3G Gravitational Wave Detectors : Probing the Very Early Universe Second Year PhD Progress Report Ashish Sharma , , 1 Gran Sasso Science


  1. Stochastic Cosmological Background Study with 3G Gravitational Wave Detectors : Probing the Very Early Universe Second Year PhD Progress Report Ashish Sharma 𝟐,πŸ‘ π›π¨πž πŠπ›π¨ πˆπ›π¬π§π­ 𝟐,πŸ‘ 1 Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), Iβˆ’67100 LAquila, Italy 2 INFN, Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Iβˆ’67100 Assergi, Italy

  2. Outline β€’ Motivation β€’ Stochastic background β€’ Cosmological source of GWs β€’ Best-fit subtraction β€’ Projection method β€’ Results β€’ Conclusion 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 2

  3. Motivation β€’ A GW stochastic background may be next class signal detected. β€’ It would be a statistical detection, confidence level will grow with the observation time. β€’ Produced very shortly after big bang. β€’ Carry Information to study early universe phenomenon not accessible by EM ways. β€’ signals will help us to understand the characteristics of the primordial signals, the fundamental physics and the evolution of the Universe. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 3

  4. Stochastic Background β€’ An incoherent superposition of large number of resolved and unresolved sources defined by statistical properties, isotropic, unpolarized, stationary and Gaussian. ? , 𝜍 = = > = ? @ A Ξ© /0 𝑔 = 3 64 78 4 5 6 9: ; BC/ β€’ Uncorrelated gravitational wave sources can be of astrophysical or cosmological sources. β€’ Cosmological: Signal of Early Universe β€’ Inflationary epoch β€’ Phase transitions β€’ Cosmic Strings β€’ Astrophysical β€’ Supernovae β€’ Magnetars β€’ Binary Objects (BH, NS) 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 4

  5. Energy Spectra of SCGW Backgrounds LVC, Nature 460 , 990-994 (2009) 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 5

  6. BBH Background Spectrum LVC, PRL 119, 029901 (2017) 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 6

  7. Sensitivity Level for GW Detectors T. Regimbau et al, PRL 118 (2017) 15, 151105 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 7

  8. Luminosity Distance and Binary mass Distribution 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 8

  9. Subtraction- Noise Projection Method β€’ This method is based on a geometrical interpretation of matched filtering and allows to access the weak signals like a stochastic GW background, irrespective of the residual noise in the data. β€’ How we used this method β€’ Injections: Generated a frequency domain strain containing the instrumental noise and signal for 1000 binary black-holes (BH). β€’ Subtraction: Performing the parameter estimation to best-fit waveform, which will give us residual noise data after subtraction β€’ Projections: Using residual noise data and Fisher matrix to perform the projection method to project out the residual noise data and search for stochastic background. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 9

  10. Fisher Matrix : Signal Model and It’s derivatives Ξ“ EF = πœ– E π‘ˆ I πœ– F π‘ˆ I 𝑒𝑔 𝑆𝑓(πœ– E π‘ˆ I 𝑔 πœ– F π‘ˆ Iβˆ— 𝑔 ) L Ξ“ EF = 2 J 𝑇 T (𝑔) K β€’ π‘ˆ I represent the signal model depending on πœ‡ E parameters used to analyse the data. β€’ Fisher matrix defined the manifold of all physical waveform of binary objects. β€’ Normalized Fisher matrix and Inverse Fisher matrix are computed to define the subtraction noise projection operator. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 10

  11. Projection of Subtraction Errors 𝑄 = 1 βˆ’ Ξ“ EF πœ– E 𝐼 βŸ¨πœ– F 𝐼 | Projection operator Projected data stream π‘„π‘ˆ [\]^6_`a (𝑔) = π‘ˆ [\]^6_`a (𝑔) βˆ’ Ξ“ EF πœ– F π‘ˆ I π‘ˆ [\]^6_`a πœ– E π‘ˆ I (𝑔) 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 11

  12. Overlap Reduction Function And Optimal Filter β€’ Quantify the instrumental influence on the correlation strength of detector outputs. Ξ³ xy f = 5 Ξ©e xβ‚¬β€’β€šβ€’ Ζ’ . βˆ†β€¦ J dβ€’ ~ (β€’ ~ (β€’ † F 3 8Ο€ } Ξ©)F € Ξ©) ~ Ξ© 1 ‰ β€’ β€ΉΕ’ = e β€ΉΕ’ Ε  βˆ’ 𝑍 β€’ β€’ ‰ ~ ` π‘Œ ^ ` 𝑍 Ε  𝐺 Ξ© = 𝑓 `Ε  Ξ© d x 2 π‘Œ ^ ^ ^ ^ β€’ The choice of filter depends upon the statistical properties of stochastic background and location and orientation of detectors. ? 𝑅 ^β€’ (𝑔) = β€˜ ; Ζ’ 78 (;)@ A ; ’ β€œ ” (;)β€œ β€’ (;) 12 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma

  13. Detector Sensitivity After Subtraction-Noise Projection 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 13

  14. Conclusion β€’ Subtraction noise projection method is effective in reducing the residual noise data. β€’ Geometrical Interpretation of matched filtering and parameter estimation easy and realistic approach for such a method. β€’ Increasing the possibility of detecting a cosmological background signal with third generation gravitational wave detectors. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 14

  15. Plan for Following Year β€’ Testing efficiency of projection method on low-SNR CBC signals. β€’ Check compatibility of subtraction-noise projection methods with arbitrary waveforms and compare the dependence of the subtraction and projection on the model for search. β€’ Injection of different types of primordial backgrounds into data and assess their detectability with 3G networks, sensitivity of 3G detectors network towards stochastic backgrounds with and without the projection. β€’ Comparing the projection method with alternative approaches (computationally expensive full Bayesian analysis of a CBC foreground + primordial background). β€’ Implementing the projection pipeline in existing LIGO/Virgo codes. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 15

  16. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 16

  17. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 17

  18. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 18

  19. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 19

  20. 10/10/19 Ashish Sharma 20

Recommend


More recommend