stacked graphs stacked graphs evolution of stacked graphs
play

STACKED GRAPHS STACKED GRAPHS EVOLUTION OF STACKED GRAPHS Stacked - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A. Thudt | J. Walny | C. Perin | F. Rajabiyazdi | L. MacDonald | R. Vardeleon | S. Greenberg | S. Carpendale ASSESSING THE READABILITY OF STACKED GRAPHS STACKED GRAPHS STACKED GRAPHS EVOLUTION OF STACKED GRAPHS Stacked Area Chart Themeriver


  1. A. Thudt | J. Walny | C. Perin | F. Rajabiyazdi | L. MacDonald | R. Vardeleon | S. Greenberg | S. Carpendale ASSESSING THE READABILITY OF STACKED GRAPHS

  2. STACKED GRAPHS

  3. STACKED GRAPHS

  4. EVOLUTION OF STACKED GRAPHS Stacked Area Chart Themeriver Streamgraph

  5. READABILITY W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 79(387):531–554,1984.

  6. READABILITY W. S. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 79(387):531–554,1984.

  7. INFORMATION LEVELS Elementary J. Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing . Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1981.

  8. INFORMATION LEVELS Elementary Intermediate J. Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing . Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1981.

  9. INFORMATION LEVELS Elementary Intermediate J. Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing . Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1981.

  10. INFORMATION LEVELS Elementary Intermediate Global J. Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing . Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1981.

  11. INFORMATION LEVELS Elementary Intermediate Global J. Bertin. Graphics and Graphic Information Processing . Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1981.

  12. CONDITIONS

  13. STACKED AREA CHART (STACK)

  14. THEMERIVER (THEME) S. Havre, B. Hetzler, and L. Nowell. ThemeRiver: visualizing theme changes over time. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFOVIS’ 00, 2000.

  15. STREAMGRAPH (STREAM) L. Byron and M. Wattenberg. Stacked graphs–geometry & aesthetics. IEEE TVCG, 14(6):1245–52, 2008.

  16. INTERACTIVE STACKED GRAPH (INT)

  17. DATASETS Random | 30 time-series | 30 time-points 311 Calls in NYC (Calls) | 10 time-series | 35 time-points Box Office Revenue Dataset (Movies) | 300 time-series | 20 time-points

  18. TASKS

  19. I. INDIVIDUAL DISCRIMINATION Which is larger: the value of the blue time-series at A or the value of the yellow time-series at B?

  20. II. STREAM COMPARISON The following area chart represents [time-series data]. In the graph below, which stream represents the same [time-series]?

  21. III. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION Is the combined value of all time-series larger at A or at B?

  22. HYPOTHESES H1: Correctness for Aggregated Discrimination (III): STACK > > STREAM THEME INT More Correct Less Correct

  23. HYPOTHESES H2: Correctness for Individual Discrimination (I) and Stream Comparison (II): THEME > > > STACK STREAM INT More Correct Less Correct

  24. HYPOTHESES H3: Completion Time for all tasks: STACK > THEME INT STREA STREAM Faster Slower

  25. 16 PARTICIPANTS 9 male, 5 female, 2 did not specify 18–65 years various occupations

  26. STUDY SETUP

  27. STUDY DESIGN within-subjects design balanced 4x4 Latin square training with all tasks for each condition 4 cond × 3 tasks x 3 datasets = 36 trials

  28. DATA

  29. EFFECT SIZES > ¡ strong & large effect strong & small effect > >

  30. EFFECT SIZES weak & large effect ≥ ¡ weak & small effect ≥ ¡

  31. RESULTS

  32. INDIVIDUAL DISCRIMINATION

  33. INDIVIDUAL DISCRIMINATION C o r re c t n e s s STREAM INT Strong & small effect > ¡ THEME STACK More Correct Less Correct

  34. INDIVIDUAL DISCRIMINATION C o m p l e t i o n Ti m e STACK Strong & small effect > ¡ INT INT STREAM Faster Slower

  35. STREAM COMPARISON

  36. STREAM COMPARISON C o r re c t n e s s Strong & small effect > STACK INT Strong & small effect > STREAM ≥ ¡ Weak & large effect THEME More Correct Less Correct

  37. STREAM COMPARISON C o m p l e t i o n Ti m e Strong & small effect > STACK INT Weak & small effect ≥ ¡ THEME Weak & small effect ≥ ¡ STREAM Faster Slower

  38. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION

  39. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o r re c t n e s s THEME Strong & small effect STREAM > More Correct Less Correct

  40. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o r re c t n e s s THEME Strong & small effect STREAM > INT Strong & small effect > STACK More Correct Less Correct

  41. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o r re c t n e s s STREAM ≈ 100% Correctness THEME INT STACK

  42. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o m p l e t i o n Ti m e Strong & small effect THEME > STACK Faster Slower

  43. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o m p l e t i o n Ti m e > ¡ Strong & large effect STREAM Strong & small effect THEME > STACK > INT Strong & small effect Faster Slower

  44. AGGREGATE DISCRIMINATION C o m p l e t i o n Ti m e > ¡ Strong & large effect STREAM STACK > ¡ INT Strong & large effect Faster Slower

  45. IMPLICATIONS

  46. WHEN TO USE WHICH STACKED GRAPH? STREAM for elementary and global level tasks with static graph

  47. WHEN TO USE WHICH STACKED GRAPH? STREAM for elementary and global level tasks with static graph INT for intermediate and global level tasks

  48. WHEN TO USE WHICH STACKED GRAPH? STREAM for elementary and global level tasks with static graph INT for intermediate and global level tasks STACK did not provide advantage, but perceived as pleasing and easy to read

  49. OTHER IMPLICATIONS Theoretical Models can work to predict perceptual advantages do not show extent of advantages

  50. OTHER IMPLICATIONS Theoretical Models can work to predict perceptual advantages do not show extent of advantages Interaction can be used for mitigating perceptual difficulties avoid increasing memory load

  51. A. Thudt | J. Walny | C. Perin | F. Rajabiyazdi | L. MacDonald | R. Vardeleon | S. Greenberg | S. Carpendale THANK YOU! Project Page: http://j.mp/stackedgraphs

Recommend


More recommend