srdjan mihaljevic cto tas
play

Srdjan Mihaljevic CTO TAS Band Sub-band Frequency Wavelength - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Srdjan Mihaljevic CTO TAS Band Sub-band Frequency Wavelength HF 3-30 MHz decametric waves VHF 30-300 MHz metric waves Low Band VHF 30-50 MHz Mid band VHF 72-75 MHz High Band VHF 138-174 MHz 220 MHz 216-220 MHz UHF 300-3000 MHz


  1. Srdjan Mihaljevic CTO TAS

  2. Band Sub-band Frequency Wavelength HF 3-30 MHz decametric waves VHF 30-300 MHz metric waves Low Band VHF 30-50 MHz Mid band VHF 72-75 MHz High Band VHF 138-174 MHz 220 MHz 216-220 MHz UHF 300-3000 MHz decimetric waves 450 MHz 420-470 MHz 758-768, 788-798 MHz IMT 700 MHz 769-775 , 799-805 MHz NB 806-824 MHz 800 MHz 851-869 MHz SHF 3-30 GHz centimetric waves 4 940-4 990 MHz 4.9 GHz

  3.  Ground-Wave Propagation  Sky-Wave Propagation

  4. HF Ground-Wave Propagation

  5. HF Sky-Wave Propagation

  6. HF NEAR-VERTICAL INCIDENCE SKY-WAVE EFFECT

  7. ANTENNA  Wavelength and Frequency  Resonance  Polarization  Classification

  8. POLARIZATION

  9. V,H & C POLARIZATION

  10. ANTENNA CLASSIFICATION

  11. ANTENNA GROUND EFFECTS

  12. • Short Wave – SW (100 m – 10 m) • oil pipeline, public safety, airlines • 30 km – low-powered, man-pack • 100 km – high-powered vehicle • thousands in cases of skip • one day may work and not the next

  13. • 11- year sunspot cycle • peak year 2012 – interference high • limited number of manufacturers • cost premiums • similar equipment on both sides • minimum power to maintain comm.

  14. • antenna systems are large • ¼ wavelength radiator – 50 m • Marconi antenna – very tall • Hertz antenna – extend many m • not easy to move • 250,000 $ multi-frequency rotatable

  15. • Low loss of transmission lines • Power-handling capability of line • RFI can travel over very great distances • link budget – no prediction • No formula for propagation – daily • Coverage is spotty – day-to-day basis • Noise floor will and can be heard 1000

  16. • Licensing – few restrictions • No data and non-voice comm. • Only available medium for tragedies • Predominant among first responders • Price are now decreasing • Size of equipment limitations • Best range – few sites – backup for all

  17.  Coverage of very large geographic area  A minimum use of tower sites  Limited equipment availability  Signal can travel up to 200 km and still be useful  Skip => 1000 km stronger signal than 20 km away  Power range 100-watt  No walkie-talkie radios  Antennas ~3 m long or loading coil to shorten  Little loss in transmission lines => smaller lines

  18.  RF interference  impulse-type noise  Electrical contacts making or breaking - arcing  Automotive distributors and spark plugs  Thunderstorms within 200 km from a system  Radio planning without problems except intrf.  Very few new low-band systems  Data and non-voice comm. are limited  Licensing is usually very easy

  19.  Generally used to connect fixed up to 200 km  only base stations allowed – no subscribers  Restricted - TV channels 4 and 5 are neighbors  The ERP levels from 25 - 100 W  The antennas are Omni directional or directional  Large antenna but slightly shorter than LB VHF  Little loss in transmission lines => smaller lines  Backhaul link between stations and other FX

  20.  Limited number of users - protection TV  RF interference little except skip  Link budget predictable  It is intended for distance 120-200 km  Noise floor is low  Licensing is relatively easy – low demand  Data and non-voice comm. are allowed  Mainly use for voice traffic

  21.  The most popular band for LMR use  Excellent range, propagation characteristics  Availability of low cost equipment  Ideal for urban and rural environments  Predominant band for public safety  Trunking, data and other non-voice traffic  All power levels  All types of antenna configurations and rather large  The signal loss in the transmission lines is acceptable

  22.  The potential for RF interference is big problem  Lightning, static discharge, and man-made issues  The very large number of VHF stations – high NF  Almost every electrical device -> interference  The electrical noise found on many building tops  The licensing of VHF systems is difficult  Long coverage range and crowding  Narowbanding 25 kHz to 12.5 kHz and 6.25 kHz.

  23.  Unpopular for most users  There are power, height, and other restrictions  The lack of low-priced equipment  Similar to HF band  No base antennas above 150 m  Marketplace’s reluctance - peripheral equipment  Antennas are large  Mobile & portable not available  Primarily for telemetry by the utility  Also for transportation industries.

  24.  Represent best of both world  Absolutely perfect for use in urban environments,  Conventional, trunking and networked systems  Very large areas of communication coverage  The variety of equipment and the good range  Well-suited for almost every application  very broad range of choices for antennas  range of transmission lines and other design

  25.  RFI from other systems  Link budget and coverage are very accurate  building penetration exceptional  Signal is mostly LOS but also more  The narrowbanding is requirement  Intermodulation is concern  Trunked system – intermodulation pairings  Mitigation by proper filtering

  26.  South America - for European TETRA (TDMA)  380-385 MHz and 390-395 MHz – emergency sys.  385-390 MHz and 395-400 MHz – civil systems  410-430 MHz and 450-460 MHz - civil systems  GOTA systems which is based on CDMA 450

  27.  15 years for public safety  Digital dividend  RF coverage in this band is excellent  There are two separate types of channels for 700  Broadband allocation of 20 MHz for IMT  Narrowband allocation of 12 MHz (6.25kHz)  769- 775 and 799-805 MHz  Abundance of equipment with advanced features

  28.  Line of sight – urban and suburban areas  Rural rarely – many towers  Wideband conventional and trunking systems  900 MHz extension of 800 MHz  all band can be mixed to accommodate fleet

  29.  public safety  Base, mobile or portable operations anywhere  there are no regulated individual channels  co-ordination obligatory between users  video and high-bandwidth data  backhaul  Utilities

  30. IMT A TRANSITION IS UNDERWAY IN EMEREGENCY COMMUNICATIONS • Emergency responders • Enhanced awarenes • PPDR industry

  31. IMT STANDARD NETWORK COMPONENTS

  32. IMT TERMINALS Car Embedded modules Handheld computers modem

  33. IMT NETWORK AVAILABILITY AND MONITORING

  34. IMT SOLUTION IN PRACTICE

  35. IMT APPLICATIONS

  36. IMT SERVICES

  37. IMT for PPDR questions: • Application range • Role of video in UL and DL • Type of terminals • Profile of users • Sharing of network • QoS

  38. Resolution 646 (Rev. WRC-12) Public protection and disaster relief ITU Region 1 380-385 390 -395 Region 2 746-806 806-869 4940-4990 Region 3 406.1-430 440-470 806-824 4940-4990 5850-5925

  39. BAND FOR IMT APPLICATION Band Footnotes identifying the (MHz) band for IMT 450-470 5.286AA 698-960 5.313A, 5.317A 1 710-2 025 5.384A, 5.388 2 110-2 200 5.388 2 300-2 400 5.384A 2 500-2 690 5.384A 3 400-3 600 5.430A, 5.432A, 5.432B, 5.433A

  40. Frequency arrangement for PPDR using IMT  PPDR Systems are outside of scope of Rec. ITU-R M.1036-4  Large coverage area and possible interoperabilities 700/800

  41. Frequency arrangements in the band 698-960 MHz Paired arrangements Un-paired arrangeme Frequency nts Base arrangemen Mobile (e.g. for Centre station Duplex ts station TDD) separation gap transmitte transmitter (MHz) (MHz) r (MHz) (MHz) (MHz) A4 698-716 12 728-746 30 716-728 776-793 13 746-763 30 A5 703-748 10 758-803 55 None A6 None None None 698-806

  42. IMT Arrangement in Region 2 MHz 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 760 770 780 790 800 810 MS Tx BS Tx BS Tx MS Tx A4 Un-paired or TDD or TDD or TDD or TDD 698 716 728 746 763 776 793 M.1036-03-A4 Mexico – No any reservation for Public Safety MHz MHz 690 690 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 780 780 790 790 800 800 5 10 MHz 3 MHz MHz A5 45 MHz 45 MHz 698 806 MHz MHz M.1036-03-A5

  43. IMT Arrangement in USA & Region 2

  44. IMT Arrangement in Mexico and Ecuador

  45. Worldwide Research Programs Public Safety Communications Research – PSCR – US Department of Commerce & Boulder Laboratories Public Safety Communication Europe Forum – PSCE – EU funded

  46. Gracias Srdjan Mihaljevic CTO TAS

Recommend


More recommend