Slope Stability Monitoring Impedance Imaging
through
Alistair Boyle, Paul Wilkinson, Jonathan Chambers, Nolwenn Lesparre, Andy Adler
a collaboration between
Slope Stability Monitoring through Impedance Imaging a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Slope Stability Monitoring through Impedance Imaging a collaboration between Alistair Boyle, Paul Wilkinson, Jonathan Chambers, Nolwenn Lesparre, & Andy Adler Spain 1998: Los Frailes Tailings Dam, Minas de Aznalcllar 1.5M m
Alistair Boyle, Paul Wilkinson, Jonathan Chambers, Nolwenn Lesparre, Andy Adler
a collaboration between
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
2
1.5M m³ tailings solids + 5.5M m³ acidic tailings water
Image: http://www.cerm3.mining.ubc.ca/Images/LosFrailes.jpg
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
3
Image & report: http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/2013/r13e0069/r13e0069.asp
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
4
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
5
water content slope stability
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
6
slope stability
water content
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
7
March 2009 September 2008
[Paul Wilkinson et al.,”Geoelectrical Landslide Tracking”, EAGE2010]
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
8
1) uniform initial σ est. based on best-fit, also used as fixed background σ 2) apparent resistivity = measurements scaled for geometry and stimulus
3) log σ: conductivity Jacobian (negativity constraint) 4) movement Jacobian by perturbation; alternate electrode sites in model 5) 2.5D: fine 3D fwd model, coarse 2D inv model, fitted to electrode pos. 6) absolute iterative Gauss-Newton solution
RTK: Real Time Kinematic; a differential GPS technology (± 1 - 4 cm absolute, 5mm relative to base station)
J ln σ=∂σ= ∂b ∂lnσ = ∂b ∂σ ∂σ ∂lnσ = ∂b ∂σ σ=J σσ
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
9
scaled adjoint Jacobian calculation In conductivity electrode perturbation downslope electrode perturbation cross-slope
T
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
10
rearranges stimulus and measurements to minimize matrix
user) optimization.
3.75 minutes for rearrangement + 15 seconds per solution ... run times were two orders of magnitude faster
N el=32, DDoF=2, PM≈37000 Timings on an Intel Xeon 2.6GHz, 8 cores, 64GB memory
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
11
20 − 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 y [m] background=32.1 Ohm.m z [m] resistivity + electrode movement (U: down slope, scaled x10) at time B − 15 30 45 60 Ohm.m
WMF SSF
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
12
– Regularization and constraints for movement – Conjugate Gradient solver versus Gauss-Newton – Better iterative solver line search
Alistair Boyle, Paul Wilkinson, Jonathan Chambers, Nolwenn Lesparre, Andy Adler
a collaboration between
through
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potash Image: http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/subcommittees/emr/usgsweb/photogallery/
April 2014
Slope Stability Monitoring
through Impedance Imaging
15
WMF: Whitby Mudstone Formations SSF: Staithes Sandstone and Cleveland Ironstone [Chambers et al. “Three-dimensional geophysical anatomy of an active landslide in Lias Group mudrocks, Cleveland Basin, UK” Geomorphology 125 (4) Feb 2011, p472–484]