single entry point financial compliance reviews
play

Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training Presentation Presented by John F. Olenberger, CPA Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC 1 Discussion Topics 1. Financial Compliance Review (FRC) Process 2. Prevalent


  1. Single Entry Point Financial Compliance Reviews Fall 2016 Training Presentation Presented by John F. Olenberger, CPA Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC 1

  2. Discussion Topics 1. Financial Compliance Review (FRC) Process 2. Prevalent issues 3. Tips for a smooth FCR process 2

  3. Financial Compliance Review (FRC) Process 1. Oversight requirement 2. Desk Reviews 3. Risk Assessment 4. On-Site Reviews 3

  4. Prevalent issues (≥5) 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA (12) 2. Payroll costs were not based on actual time worked (6) 3. Unsupported allocation methodology (6) 4. HCA split out (6) 5. Inappropriate expenditures/program overcharged (5 ) 4

  5. 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA #1 most common issue • Half of sites, including desk reviews • Many are repeat issues • No root cause on half of issues- unable • to support figure reported Other sources of problem • 5

  6. 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA (con’t) CDHCPF award letter language adjusted for SFY • 2013; some external auditors may be focusing on figures, rather than language Should report lesser of amount rec’d or amount • expended (Federal funds portion) Root cause is usually external auditor preparing • SEFA without input from SEP Agency 5 noted to date in FY ‘16- Getting better • 6

  7. 1. Incorrectly reported SEFA Examples of proper reporting Funding Expenditures Report on SEFA (1/2 of expenditures, up to Fed award) 1,000,000 1,200,000 500,000 1,000,000 900,000 450,000 7

  8. 2. Payroll costs were not based on actual time worked Present in 29% of site visits (up from • 13% in FY ’14 Hard-coding of allocation % in payroll • system; time sheets disregarded Charges based on budgetary estimates, • not trued up 8

  9. 3. Unsupported allocation methodology 29% of sites (down from 38% last year) • Vast majority could not provide support for • how a charge was derived Unsupported internal service rates • Expenses “pushed” by another department • are still SEP expenses 9

  10. 4. HCA split out 29% of sites (same as last year) • Relatively new issue (First brought up • during FY 2012 audits) SEP= state & federally funded • HCA= state funded only • Cannot use federal funds for a non • federally funded program 10

  11. 4. HCA split out (con’t) Problems with precise time tracking • New guidance allows allocation by client • counts All time incurred for initial assessments as • well as re-assessments can be charged to HCBS. Ongoing HCA case management must be charged to HCA. 11

  12. 5. Inappropriate expenditures/ program overcharged 24% of sites (down from 38% last year) • Erroneously coded to SEP • Monthly charges for IT equipment used by other • departments Reimbursement of provider charges for client medical care • Unemployment benefits charged to SEP program for non- • SEP employee with similar name. Personnel costs not based on actual time worked • Co-Mingling of HCA & HCBS expenditures • $140K in program overcharges identified, over half related • to co-mingling. 12

  13. Tips for a smooth FCR process Detailed list of expenditures should tie to • totals per general ledger. If they do not, provide a reconciliation and explanation. “Self audit”- For the selected transactions, • ensure the supporting documentation makes sense to you. If it doesn’t, determine if alternate documentation exists to support transaction. 13

  14. Tips for a smooth FCR process (cont.) Obtain support for County allocations. If you are • allocated $100/month for IT costs, how does the County arrive at this number? Is it reasonable? Support- We are looking for the minimum required to • support the transaction, allocation, and applicability to the program. We do not need a copy of the check, as we obtained • this info from the detailed transaction listing. Copies that are helpful to us: Receipt/invoice, • approval, allocation calculation 14

  15. Tips for a smooth FCR process (cont.) Need support for basis of County • allocation. If the County is allocating a $20K insurance bill, we will want to see the actual $20K bill to the County. 15

  16. Questions/Comments 16

  17. Contact Information John F. Olenberger, CPA Colorado Independent Consultants Network, LLC (303) 333-8989 jolenberger@cicn.biz www.cicn.biz 17

Recommend


More recommend