school accountability systems
play

School Accountability Systems Chris Domaleski Center for Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Establishing Performance Standards for School Accountability Systems Chris Domaleski Center for Assessment National Conference on Student Assessment San Diego, CA June 27, 2018 Accountability Ratings: Meaning Matters How can we help


  1. Establishing Performance Standards for School Accountability Systems Chris Domaleski Center for Assessment National Conference on Student Assessment San Diego, CA June 27, 2018

  2. Accountability Ratings: Meaning Matters • How can we help stakeholders understand, interpret, and make good decisions based on school ratings? • Whether these ratings are points, stars, letters, or something else, establishing and communicating the ratings thoughtfully is an important part of accountability. Performance Standards in Accountability 2 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  3. Everyone knows what an ‘A’ means, right? • Credit Ratings – S&P describes an “A” as, “strong capacity to meet financial commitments” a s distinguished from AAA “extremely strong” or AA “very strong” – In August 2011 S&P downgraded the U.S. from AAA to AA+ stating in part, “the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened.” – Does the letter grade alone tell you what you need to know to inform a buy or sell decision? • New York Department of Health restaurant grades – “A letter grade of A indicates the a restaurant received 13 or fewer health code violations in their last inspection … violations are likely to be technicalities or non- critical infractions” – Does the letter grade alone provide the information you need to make a decision about where to dine? Performance Standards in Accountability 3 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  4. The meaning of a rating matters • Other interesting ratings: – Rotten Tomatoes Movie ratings: • Fresh = Tomatometer of at least 60% positive reviews • Certified Fresh = 75% positive reviews. – Hurricanes: • Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale rates a hurricane's intensity using wind speed and storm surge. • Category 5 is characterized by 155+ wind speeds and storm surges above 18 feet – Collectables: • Typical scale: mint, near mint, excellent, very good, good, poor. • For example, a “very good” baseball card can have scratches, stains, creases, and fading. • The point is: meanings matter! – Should you spend your money on a movie that isn’t ‘Certified Fresh’? – Should you go outside in a category 3 hurricane? – Can you expect a baseball card in ‘good’ condition to have value? Performance Standards in Accountability 4 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  5. Performance Standards in Accountability • Given the importance of accountability ratings, it is reasonable to require evidence that the rating has a high degree of validity for the intended uses and purposes • A substantial part of that validity argument is the design and implementation of sound process for establishing standards that credibly reflects the state’s vision and policy priorities • While there is a research base for assessment standard setting, accountability standards are often overlooked and are defined arbitrarily or tautologically • Ultimately, the intent is to improve the clarity and usability for stakeholders Performance Standards in Accountability 5 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  6. Principles • Rationale, procedure, and results should be well documented • The process should be designed to allow well- qualified policy-makers, experts, and/or stakeholders an opportunity to inform the decisions • Participants should be provided information associated with relevant consequences and criteria Performance Standards in Accountability 6 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  7. How to define ‘Good Enough’ Performance? • Decisions of policy-makers and leaders, which are often reflected in law, rules, guidance, or vision statement – SEA long-term goals and measures of interim progress – ESSA high school graduation rate criterion of 67% • Based on normative data – E.g. top 10% receive an ‘A’ – Analyses of legacy data to determine rate of improvement that can be expected • Expert judgment • Relationship to external criteria Performance Standards in Accountability 7 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  8. Promising Practices • Develop policy descriptors for each level • Develop school performance level descriptors • Convene panel or other group (e.g. task force, advisory group) to: – Evaluate school profiles with respect to descriptors – Review data on achievement patterns – Set Indicator thresholds and overall thresholds • Evaluate • Document • Produce material to support interpretation and use Performance Standards in Accountability 8 CCSSO NCSA 2018

  9. State Illustrations • Today we will hear from two states that implemented a systematic process to set meaningful performance expectations for their school accountability system • The intent is to learn from their experiences to identify challenges and opportunities to inform the work in your state Performance Standards in Accountability 9 CCSSO NCSA 2018

Recommend


More recommend