scaling up care for orphans in tanzania a task sharing
play

Scaling Up Care for Orphans in Tanzania: A Task-sharing Approach to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scaling Up Care for Orphans in Tanzania: A Task-sharing Approach to Mental Health Treatment Shannon Dorsey 1 , Karen ODonnell 2 , Kate Whetten 2 ; Wenfeng Gong 3; Dafrosa Itemba 4 , & Rachel Manongi 5 1 University of Washington, ; 2 Duke


  1. Scaling Up Care for Orphans in Tanzania: A Task-sharing Approach to Mental Health Treatment Shannon Dorsey 1 , Karen O’Donnell 2 , Kate Whetten 2 ; Wenfeng Gong 3; Dafrosa Itemba 4 , & Rachel Manongi 5 1 University of Washington, ; 2 Duke University; 3 Johns Hopkins University; 4 Tanzania Women Research Foundation; 5 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre NIMH R34 MH081764; 2009-2012 NIMH R01 MH96633; 2012-2017

  2. Acknowledgements  NIMH  USAID Victims of Torture Fund (funded training development)  Lui Mfangavo (coordinator, interviewer)  Simon Chudy (lay counselor)  Suzan Kitomari (lay counselor)  Bibiana Gali (lay counselor)  Leonia Rugalabamu (lay counselor)  Karthik Balasubramanian  Lillian Chinganyana  Wenfeng Gong

  3. Acknowledgements  Implementation Research Institute  Dr. Dorsey is an investigator with the Implementation Research Institute (IRI), at the George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis; through an award from the National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH080916-01A2) and the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI).

  4. Orphans in Low and Middle Income Countries  Estimated 143 million  16.6 million of these to HIV/AIDS  “More than the loss of a parent 1 …”  High rates of exposure to potentially traumatic events  Higher rate trauma exposure associated with mental health problems 1 Whetten, Ostermann, Whetten, O’Donnell & Thielman, 2011; Cluver, Fincham & Seedat, 2009

  5. Problems of Orphans: Sadness and Grief During development: “need help with children’s sadness”

  6. Low and Middle Income Countries  Significant mental health treatment gap (over 75%) 1  Scarcity: Few MH professionals 2  Inequity: MH services within and across countries 2 Lower Middle Income Low Income 1 Kohn, Saxena, Levav, & Saraceno, 2004; 2 Saraceno et al., 2007; WHO, 2008; WHO, 2009

  7. Treatment Gap: Children For each child with need… .16% receive treatment Saraceno et al., 2007

  8. LMIC: Addressing Treatment Gap Implementation Mental Strategy: “Task health Shifting/Sharing professionals Approach” Lay Counselors— Little or No Mental Health Training Patel, 2009

  9. Randomized Trials: Evidence for Evidence-based MH Interventions in LMIC  Pakistan 2  Uganda 1  Perinatal women with  Adults depression  Adolescents  Internally displaced persons  Iraq, Thailand (displaced Burmese) 4  India 3  Adults  Adults  Torture, systematic violence  Depression/Anxiety 1 Bolton et al., 2003, 2007; 2 Rahman, Malik, Sikander, Roberts, & Creed, 2008; 3 Patel et al., 2010 ; 4 Bolton et al., results forthcoming (Dorsey, involved)

  10. Modifications: Not to Core Components HOW training is conducted Local idioms and stories Simplifying terms, avoiding “clinical” terms: depression Supervision Situating within local context Patel, Chowdhary, Rahman, & Verdeli, 2011

  11. Pa Pamoja Tuna naweza TF-CBT Intervention Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) Moshi, Tanzania

  12. TF-CBT Randomized Trial (NIMH; Duke & UW; Dorsey & Whetten) Orphans: Traumatic Stress and Grief-focused Murray, Consultant TF-CBT Randomized Trial (DCOF; Johns Hopkins; Murray & Bolton) TF-CBT Feasibility Study (NIMH; Duke & UW; Whetten; Dorsey, Co-I) TF-CBT Feasibility Study Orphans: (NIMH; Johns Hopkins; Traumatic Stress and Murray) Grief-focused Sexual abuse TF-CBT Randomized Trial (NICHD; Johns Hopkins) Murray & Bolton HIV-prevention focus Dorsey: Faculty

  13. Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Entire Process is Desensitization/Exposure Baseline Assessment Sessions 1-4 5-8 9-12 P sychoeducation T rauma Narrative C onjoint Parent P arenting Skills Development and Child Sessions Processing R elaxation E nhancing I n-vivo Gradual Safety and A ffective Exposure Future Expression and Development Regulation C ognitive Coping

  14. http://tfcbt.musc.edu/

  15. TF-CBT Internationally  TF-CBT Web registrants from over 70 countries  Cohen, Mannarino & Deblinger (2006) translated into Dutch, Korean, Mandarin, & German  Currently being translated into Japanese and Polish  China, Japan, Singapore  Norway, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands  Zambia, Tanzania, Cambodia, Indonesia  South Korea (Introduction)

  16. http://ctg.musc.edu/

  17. Qualitative Study (DIME Procedures 1 ): Orphan Problems in Tanzania Qualitative Study with Orphans and Guardians  Many needs related to education, food, clothing, and shelter  Mental health problems still in the running: mentioned by guardians AND children JHU Applied Mental Health Research group; Bolton, 2001

  18. Qualitative Study (DIME Procedures): Orphan Problems in Tanzania  Tabia Mbaya (Bad Behavior)  Unyanyasaji (humiliation/treated badly)  Kuathirika kisaikologia (psychological problems)  Kutopendwa (not feeling/being loved)  Msongo wa mawazo (stress; overthinking)

  19. Feasibility study Can lay counselors deliver the intervention with fidelity? TF-CBT with Orphans in Tanzania Is the model acceptable with children/adolescents, guardians, and counselors? ID any needed modifications for local delivery * guardian support

  20. Partnership with Local CBO  Tanzania Women Research Foundation

  21. Study Design  N = 64 children (7-13)  Half urban; half rural Assessment  Pre-treatment  Post-treatment  3-month follow-up  12-month follow-up

  22. Focus Group Feedback TF-CBT Intervention Single sex groups Divide by age: 7-10; 11-13 Tea and snacks to start

  23. TF-CBT Intervention  12 groups; Child and guardian  TF-CBT components AND four grief-specific components  3 individual visits for individual Imaginal Exposure  At home or community location (e.g., school)  12-session agenda: Collaboratively developed with lay counselors post-training  Revised iteratively

  24. Adherence Monitoring: Groups

  25. Monitoring Individual Child and Guardian Response

  26. Completed Pilot; 8 groups ( N = 64) Current Study Status All data collected (12 mo. to be analyzed) High satisfaction: guardian exit interviews  Completed all 8 groups ( N = 64) Good attendance  All end of treatment and 3-months post-treatment data collected  One-year follow up data still to be collected for groups 7 & 8  High levels of satisfaction with the group, reported in guardian exit interviews  Good attendance

  27. PTSD Outcomes 50 45 40 35 PTSD Symptoms 30 25 Caregiver 20 Child 15 10 5 0 Baseline End of Treatment 3 Month FU Panel Regression: BL-ET: Caregiver β = 11.19, p < .001; Child β = 15.38, p < .001

  28. Traumatic Grief Outcomes 30 25 20 15 Child 10 5 0 Baseline End of Treatment 3-month FU Panel Regression: BL-ET: Child β = 8.46, p < . 001

  29. Summary and Implications  TF-CBT: feasible and acceptable  Guardians requested additional group meetings  Lay Counselors: High fidelity  Loved the intervention  Outcomes appear promising Limitations  Small sample size  No control group

  30. TF-CBT: RCT in Eastern Africa  Moshi, Tanzania  Bungoma, Kenya  RCT: TF-CBT compared to usual care (UC) supports  Lay Counselors from NIMH R34 assist with training of new providers in both sites  Provide supervision, under supervision themselves  12 counselors (6 in each country)  20 groups in each country (320 youth: TF-CBT; 320 UC)

  31. Training Model: Murray, Dorsey et al., 2011

  32. Apprenticeship Model: Lay Counselors Murray, Dorsey, et al., 2011

  33. Apprenticeship Model: Lay Counselors Murray, Dorsey, et al., 2011

  34. R34 Counselors:

  35. Partners

  36. Outcomes of Interest Clinical Outcomes  PTSD Symptoms  Traumatic Grief  Depression  Child Functioning Implementation Outcomes  Fidelity (BRs; self-reported; via coded audiotapes)  Child/Guardian attendance  Acceptability  Provider Knowledge  Supervisory Relationship

  37. Outcomes of Interest Clinical Outcomes  PTSD Symptoms  Traumatic Grief  Depression  Child Functioning Implementation Outcomes  Fidelity (BRs; self-reported; via coded audiotapes)  Child/Guardian attendance  Acceptability  Provider Knowledge  Supervisory Relationship

  38. To Date…  October 2012: Training  Administered Modified Practice Attitudes Scale  Independent ratings of overall counselor fidelity post- training  Similar pattern ratings across counselors; with “expert”  Knowledge pre and post-test

  39. Possibilities for Broad Scale Up… Remote Behavioral Rehearsal and Supervision

  40. Lay Counselors as Co-Trainers & Supervisors Adherence “Step Sheets” guide practice Adherence =Following the recipe

  41. Lay Counselors as Co-Trainers & Supervisors Competence: List developed collaboratively: “ What do You SAY in feedback ?” Spicing it up: Flexibility within Fidelity

  42. Task-shifting/ Task-sharing “… however, the biggest barrier to scaling up may be the perception held by mental health specialists about the risks of non- specialist health workers delivering [psychological treatments] …” Patel et al., 2011, p. 527

Recommend


More recommend