s tudy o verview f indings s urvey r esults j oint urmdac
play

S TUDY O VERVIEW , F INDINGS , S URVEY R ESULTS J OINT URMDAC AND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

S TUDY O VERVIEW , F INDINGS , S URVEY R ESULTS J OINT URMDAC AND RROMAC February 15, 2017 2013 Legislative charge evaluate the long-term transportation strategies and investments needed to sustain the countys economic health and


  1. S TUDY O VERVIEW , F INDINGS , S URVEY R ESULTS J OINT URMDAC AND RROMAC February 15, 2017

  2. 2013 Legislative charge “…evaluate the long-term transportation strategies and investments needed to sustain the county’s economic health and quality of life in the coming decades”

  3. Public process shaped study • Online open houses and community briefings Public • Advised project team throughout the study Advisory Committee • Reviewed approach and analysis Agency Coordination

  4. Our Past: Growth and transition  Grew faster than predicted  Much more ethnically diverse  Land use plans responded to changing community values and economic conditions  Implemented transportation funding strategies

  5. Our Future: Urban form takes hold  Growth scenarios based on  Local plans and 2040 Growth Concept  Urban and Rural Reserves  Changing demographics and technology  Two scenarios  Current Trends  Increased Trade and Technology

  6. More people + more jobs = more urban  Population could increase 40%-55%  Growth targeted to urban centers and corridors  Employment could increase 100%-145%  More daily trips into the county than out of the county; and the share of daily trips within the county will increase

  7. More people + more jobs = more trips  Total trips increase up to 60%  Driving trips to increase by 50%  Walking and biking trips increase by nearly 100%  Transit trips increase by over 200%

  8. More trips = more traffic delay and congestion 165%  Longer travel times, 365% especially on freeways Vehicle hours of delay (PM Peak) % increase compared to 2010  Congested regional access points  Truck hours of delay, especially on freeways, increases over four-fold  More cut-through traffic

  9. Transportation Investment Packages A. Adopted Plans, Enhanced Transit and Demand Management B. Builds upon A with an Enhanced Arterial Network C. Builds upon A with New Major Roadway and Transit Capacity

  10. Centers + corridors = fewer vehicle trips  VMT per person trip continue to decline  Improved street connectivity, parking management, and commuter programs  Increase non-auto use by 50% in centers  More roads = more VMT

  11. Smart technology = better efficiency and safety  Increased efficiency with smart streets (signal and communications technology)  Improved safety, and reliability with smart cars (connected/ autonomous vehicles)  May increase VMT

  12. More people + more jobs = more transit demand  Portland transit trips more than double  Transit trips within county increase by nearly 300%  Transit demand increases an additional 20% with express service and park & ride  80% of households within ¼ mile of transit  More than 80% of low-income households within ¼ mile

  13. Improved arterials = better traffic distribution Improved arterial capacity, new connections and access management could:  Reduce traffic delay by 5%  Improve safety  Shift traffic out of neighborhoods  Limited freight and travel time improvement

  14. New roads + highway capacity = reduced delay and improved travel time  Reduce traffic delay up to 15%  Reduce cut-through traffic in urban centers by up to 14%  Improve travel times between key regional centers

  15. New road connections = reduced regional traffic on parallel routes New Northern Northern Connector Connector :  Reduces traffic on US 26, including 60% of trucks  Improves travel time to North-South Limited Access PDX and I-5 Northbound Road  Rural, community and environmental impacts

  16. New road connections = reduced regional traffic on parallel routes New North-South Northern Connector Limited Access Road :  Reduces traffic on TV Hwy and rural roads  Improves travel time North-South Limited Access between Hillsboro and Road Clackamas County  Rural, community and environmental impacts

  17. Managed highway lanes = improved travel times • Managed lanes for trucks, transit and carpool could:  Reduce delay for trucks by over 40%  Increase carpooling • Demand stills exceed capacity

  18. Pricing = reduced congestion  Tolling can help better manage traffic flow BUT May increase cut-through traffic  Road user charges (VMT charge) can reduce travel demand by as much as 15% IF Implemented as a variable fee - by time and location

  19. Complete streets + trails = improved health and safety  200% increase in walking and biking  Almost 80% of the households will have access to a complete street (with sidewalks and bike lanes) or a trail  Protected bike lanes, trails, and complete streets improve safety and access

  20. Relative costs  Costs range from Bicycle & $11 B to $26 B Pedestrian *  New revenue Transit needed Arterials Highways * Estimated costs in 2016 dollars, subject to refinement

  21. What does the public think?

  22. How did the County get input? O NLINE O PEN H OUSE • 5,319 People participated (Also, 42 participated in Spanish- language survey) • BIG INCENTIVE! R ANDOM S AMPLE P HONE S URVEY • Telephone survey among 400 Washington County residents age 18 years and older • Margin of error +-5%

  23. Transportation priorities O VERALL People support a multimodal system • • Improving traffic flow is top objective O NLINE O PEN H OUSE • Ranked transit as top priority; closely followed by new freeway lanes R ANDOM S AMPLE P HONE S URVEY • Ranked roads and highways as top priority; closely followed by transit

  24. Support for new funding sources O NLINE O PEN H OUSE • 2 out of 3 support or strongly support a gas tax, and over half support/strongly support paid parking. R ANDOM S AMPLE P HONE S URVEY 3 out of 4 people would be • willing to pay $100 per year • 48% willing to pay $300/year

  25. Other key findings  88% expect transportation will be a problem in the future.  80% support exploring ways to use smart technologies to reduce the need for widening or building new roads  Over 70% said very important to reduce freeway congestion within and connecting to Washington County  60%-70% support new limited access N-S roadways  Increased support if it reduces congestion  Decreased support if it increases GHG, impacts farm and forest

  26. What’s next? • Continued review of the findings • Collect input on next steps: – Investments – Studies – Policies – Partnership

  27. Questions

  28. Thank you! Study Contact Information www.WCTransportationFutures.org Department of Land Use and Transportation 503-846-4530

Recommend


More recommend