robosub 2017 2018
play

RoboSub 2017-2018 Jordan Lankford, Ryan Harty, Jake Hannafious, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RoboSub 2017-2018 Jordan Lankford, Ryan Harty, Jake Hannafious, Daniel Mansfield, Marta Camacho, Moeez Malik, Billy Phillips, Ross Dobitz, Oren Pierce, Jeremy Naeve, Nick Baron O2P/VIP Members: Kaitie Wood, Jake Harmon, Samual McCallum, Angel


  1. RoboSub 2017-2018 Jordan Lankford, Ryan Harty, Jake Hannafious, Daniel Mansfield, Marta Camacho, Moeez Malik, Billy Phillips, Ross Dobitz, Oren Pierce, Jeremy Naeve, Nick Baron O2P/VIP Members: Kaitie Wood, Jake Harmon, Samual McCallum, Angel Sanchez, Al Alothman

  2. Acknowledgements ● Advising Professor: Dr. Anthony Maciejewski Graduate Advisors: Christopher Robbiano, Megan Emmons ● Industry Advisors: Dr. Jacob Sauer and Torie Hadel with Ball Aerospace ● Distinctive Welding Inc.

  3. Budget and Finance

  4. What is the RoboSub Project? ● Competition put on by the U.S. Navy and Robonation at the TRANSDEC facility in San Diego California ● Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) must be fully autonomous No communication with the AUV is allowed ● during competition ● All teams are required to build and design the vehicle from the ground up

  5. Last Year ● Project officially started last year Researched parts ● ● First chassis design ● Thruster Testing ● Began work on vision and sensor components Propulsion & Power, Vision & Sensors, and Mechanical ● Subteams

  6. This Year’s Team ● Propulsion & Power, Vision & Sensors, Mechanical, and Controls Subteams ● 11 seniors and 5 underclassmen ● Underclassmen perform testing and validation role Semester goal was to have the AUV in the water ● and able to track a line

  7. Mechanical Subteam Ryan Harty Jake Hannafious Daniel Mansfield

  8. What We Started With Testing previous team’s design ● ○ Thermal generation and dissipation ■ Internal temperature reached hazardous levels Forward and lateral hydrodynamic drag ○ ■ Top speed was below acceptable levels Mass and buoyancy measurements ○ ■ Too heavy to compete when loaded to neutral buoyancy ■ (>160lbs, must be <125lbs) Internal volume and electronics layout ○ measurements ■ Electronics difficult to access and limited in space

  9. Where We Went from There ● Fixed Points and Focus Reduce buoyancy and mass ○ ○ Hydrodynamics Electronics layout and accessibility ○ ○ Increase thermal dissipation Improvements ● Top speed increased ○ ■ ~0.6m/s to >2m/s Net buoyancy % reduced ○ ■ ~67% to <15% Dry weight reduced ○ ■ ~110lbs to ~45lbs Thermal Dissipation ○ ■ No data yet, subjectively better

  10. Where We’re Going Next CNC machining chassis v2 ● ● New arm to adapt to new challenges Golf ball grabbing/dispensing ○ ○ Golf ball storage/transport magazine Packaged into fairings ○ ● Torpedo launcher Accuracy improvements ○ ○ Packaging into fairings Ballast system ● ○ Reduce dry weight Integrated mandatory safety system ○ ● Casting fairings for hydrodynamic improvement

  11. Testing Video

  12. Propulsion Subteam Jordan Lankford Moeez Malik Marta Camacho

  13. Propulsion System Constraints As per the Robosub Competition Rules: ● AUV must be able to: ○ Sense and maneuver in the area using on board resources Be battery powered with all batteries sealed ○ ● Open circuit voltage of any battery or battery system in the vehicle cannot exceed 60V DC All vehicles must contain a clearly marked kill switch that will remove power ● to the motors and send AUV to surface

  14. 2016 - 2017 Summary Investigating Systems - What are other teams doing? ● Major Part Selection ● ○ Motors Electronic Speed Controllers (ESC) ○ ○ Battery Testing ● ○ Motor Load Testing: Heat up and power dissipation under load ○ Underwater Motor Testing ■ Outward thrust of motors and power dissipation ● Design Battery Management System (BMS) ○ ○ Printed Circuit Board (PCB)

  15. Transfer of Knowledge - Continuing Tasks ● Battery Management System (BMS) ○ Design around the power requirements of the larger motors ○ Decided to change course due to lack of need ● Propulsion Controls and Feedback ○ Controls Subteam formation Propulsion Drive ● ○ Motor actuation and chassis mobility CAD File of BMS Circuit Layout

  16. Propulsion Part Modifications ● ● Current Monitoring System Design ● Motor Control Direct Control: PS2 Controller ○ ○ Indirect Control: Arduino + Pi Work that was done this interfacing semester

  17. Part Modifications UAV Brushless Motor: Max 2016/17 Thruster: Max Power 430 Watts HobbyKing 60A ESC Fwd/Bkwd: about 5 lbs T200 Thruster: Fwd HobbyKing 30A ESC Max: 11 lbs Bkwd: 9 lbs M200: Max Power 350 Watts

  18. Current Monitoring ● Hall Effect sensors will sense the amount of current drawn by the motors ● Enable the Arduino to alert the Raspberry Pi to reduce the thrust to prevent the battery from ACS712 Hall Effect Sensor draining too quickly

  19. Motor Control Direct and Indirect

  20. Direct Control: Motor Control Testing with Gaming Controller Control all 6 motors ● Movements mapped to a specific ● button ● Ability to move forward/backward, left/right, up/down Roll, pitch, and yaw ● ● Allows us to record current draw for each motor as well as internal Play Station 2 Gaming temperature Controller

  21. Indirect Motor Control - Arduino + Raspberry Pi Master Arduino Mega- Slave Controller controller that receives motor Disarm (0) Motor State, state and PWM values from a PWM1,..,PWM6 Master Controller so as to: Error Clear Power ● Attach/Detach motors from Arm (1) power PWM ● Supply a PWM signal to each motor dictating motor speed Current Values Error (2) Motors 1-6

  22. Moving Forward….. PCB Layout for Raspberry Pi Propulsion Systems... Arduino Mega Hall Effect Sensor

  23. Look Ma, no hands! Spring 2018 Main Goal Complete onboard motor control and actuation with some sensor data, hall effects and Pi-Arduino communications

  24. Sensors Subteam Oren Pierce Ross Dobitz Billy Phillips

  25. Overview There are five things the AUV needs to know 1. Current location 2. Depth 3. Desired location 4. Orientation 5. Audio signals a. Next semester

  26. Sensors Hardware Nvidia Jetson TX2 Vision Processing, Primary Controller

  27. Sensors Hardware GoPro Hero 4 Black Raspberry PiCam Cameras Raspberry Pi Pressure Transducer Precision A/D Converter Depth Measurement

  28. Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Why use an IMU? ● Keep the AUV’s balance ○ Crucial for correct movement Feedback ● ○ Check to see if the commands to the motor are being executed ● Dead reckoning

  29. Dead Reckoning Knowing where you are relative to where you started How is this done? ● Take in Accelerometer and Gyroscope data Change the acceleration axis into a world view ● ○ Will not use magnetometers ● From the corrected acceleration, we can get position This is the hard part due to noise ○

  30. Vision - The Eyes of the AUV ● Software Language - Python ○ ○ Operating System - Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux) Image Processing - OPENCV ○ ○ Code is developed on the same platform the AUV will be using ● The Code Repository All code is updated to the RoboSub ○ GitHub All code is documented with Doxygen ○ ○ Used to ensure the code can be found and worked on by multiple programmers with ease

  31. Building an Object “Profile” Circle ● Object Classification Certain attributes are used to describe an ○ object An object can be a buoy, target, line, etc. ○ ● Shape and Location Detection What constitutes a shape? ○ ○ How do humans know that a circle is a Environment circle? ○ AUV uses Normalized Cross-Correlation Color Detection ● ○ To a computer, color is defined on an RGB scale ○ The average color of the object is found from the frame returned by cross-correlation

  32. What is Next for Vision Functionality for Multiple Object Types ● ○ Once code is fully functional for buoys, modify to include lines, targets, gates, etc. ● Add Recursion Current code processes only one frame ○ ○ Code will be modified to process images taken by the camera at a certain frame rate ● Tracking and Updating Objects As the AUV moves, the average color and ○ location of an object will change Has an object already been identified? ○ ○ How many different objects are in a frame at once

  33. The Role of Computer Vision ● Since the cameras and image processing units are making decisions, they have a job ● Controls tells Vision what information we need to find and return to them Vision carries out their task and returns ● feedback to controls ● Think of Controls as the Captain of a Ship and Vision as a Forward Observer

  34. ● Control System Constraints ○ How does everything fit together Controls Goals ● ● Current Work ○ How to implement our Sensors Jeremy Naeve ○ How we control the AUV Nick Baron ● Next Semester

  35. Overview ● Controls wasn’t a part of the previous year project Became a subteam this year because of progress made last year in both ● sensors and propulsion ● Necessity as controls will tie everything together in the sub ● Lots of coding necessary Have to have a functioning knowledge of both other subteams ●

Recommend


More recommend