roadmap best use of real world evidence to address
play

ROADMAP: Best use of Real World Evidence to address specific - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ROADMAP: Best use of Real World Evidence to address specific healthcare challenges The state of Alzheimers disease in Europe innovation, value and challenges for HTA Alzheimer Europe Conference, 4 October, 2017 Catherine Reed , Lilly


  1. ROADMAP: Best use of Real World Evidence to address specific healthcare challenges The state of Alzheimer’s disease in Europe – innovation, value and challenges for HTA Alzheimer Europe Conference, 4 October, 2017 Catherine Reed , Lilly www.roadmap-alzheimer.org I 1 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org @IMI2_ROADMAP

  2. Objectives for this presentation  What is real world evidence (RWE) and what is it used for?  What are the challenges for RWE in AD and will the goals of ROADMAP address these?  What input from individuals and caregivers can benefit the ROADMAP deliverables? I 2 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  3. Real World Evidence (RWE)  E.g. medical records, insurance data, cohort studies  One form of evidence (along with RCT*, health economics studies, etc.) taken from primary or secondary/existing real world data sources for the purpose of providing insights, on diseases, medicines, patient populations and healthcare practices, that will inform decision making  RWE potentially better informs regulators (on effectiveness and safety), payers and healthcare providers (cost effectiveness), industry (pricing and manufacturing), and scientists (mechanisms and diagnostic/treatment pathways) to assist decision-making on new and existing treatments. I 3 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org *RCT: Randomized Clinical Trials

  4. Challenges for AD RWE Available data sources to inform the real world trajectory and impact of AD are limited  Lack of consensus on study design and endpoints in real world data sources  Lack of AD-related outcomes in medical records relevant across the spectrum of disease  Lack of clarity on how best to model of natural history of the disease using real world data sources Severe AD Prodromal/MCI Mild AD Pre-clinical Moderate AD AD Dementia Dementia due to AD Dementia Positive Amyloid PET Imaging Scan and/or A β CSF/ Tau changes Asymptomatic/ Multi-domain Severe cognitive Memory impairment potential slight memory deficit impairment impairment No functional Some impairment of Functional impairment complex function (iADLs) impairment Behavioural symptoms Nursing home/ Some assistance full time care I 4 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  5. Opportunities Leverage existing large data set to perform pilots Harmonize collation methods and analytical tools I 5 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  6. What is ROADMAP? Real world Outcomes across the AD spectrum for better care: Multi- modal data Access Platform (ROADMAP)  ROADMAP is a private-public partnership (PPP) to explore the usability of all available data sources in the decision-making process  Goal is to bring data together for the benefit of individuals with AD and their caregivers This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 116020 (“ROADMAP”). This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA. I 6 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  7. ROADMAP Consortium Public partners EFPIA partners Associated Data Providers EMA- National/Regional NICE/HTA/payers Health Authorities Qualification Pilot to comprise an Expert use of RWE in AD Advisory Group (EXAG led by NICE): Related projects (1) HTA bodies/payers from different archetypes (2) Regulators (3) Patient Associations I 7 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  8. ROADMAP Structure WP1 – Project Management Executive Committee (UOXF, EMC, NOVARTIS, Eli Lilly, BIOGEN, NICE, SYNAPSE) √ WP2 – Outcome Definition WP8 – Ethical, Legal and WP6 – Regulatory and Social Implications (ELSI) HTA Engagement WP3 – Identification, Mapping and Integration of RWE WP4 – Disease Modelling and Simulation √ √ WP5 – Health Economics √ WP7 – Communication and Patient/Healthcare/ Provider Engagement I 8 √ 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org Patient association involvement

  9. Objectives  Develop and implement a communication strategy focussing on the needs of patients and professionals – Involve national patient groups/Alzheimer associations to further disseminate and communicate project results and achievements at a national level – Special attention will be paid to outreach activities that align with patient and carer needs and interests and synergies with other IMI projects. – Engagement with policy makers at EU and national level and interact with the European Alzheimer’s Alliance to promote a RWE approach and the findings of the project. – Establish a group of interest for the second phase of the project, especially involving scientists, companies, individuals with AD and carers, Alzheimer associations and general public. I 9 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  10. Objectives  Define and catalogue scales and consensus-based methodologies for identifying AD outcomes from routinely collected data e.g. in cognition, dependency, caregiver impact – Input on the most important measures from partners in Alzheimer Europe via patients, carers and associated charities who are willing and able to: • provide input to survey content • contribute to survey feedback • participate in outcome prioritisation workshops I 10 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  11. Objectives  Develop guiding principles and recommendations from HTA/payers/regulators for the development and incorporation of RWE into clinical and market access development plans for AD – Attending meeting alongside regulator and payers stakeholders to evaluate and inform on ROADMAP plans and output I 11 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  12. Objectives  Develop an ELSI* framework with extensive patient involvement for the development and application of RWE in AD – Participation of AE in the ethics advisory board – Input into areas of re-purposing data, prioritizing outcomes and defining clinically relevant progression – Participation in focus groups to collect patient attitudes towards the specific platform and data integration proposed by ROADMAP I 12 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org *ELSI: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications

  13. Impact of ROADMAP  More transparent, open and widely accepted outcomes in AD will aid more streamlined decision making for access to new therapies.  Data integration requirements for improved understanding of AD progression and treatment benefits.  Establish consensus across industry and public consortium with stakeholder engagement. I 13 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

  14. THANK YOU I 14 10-Oct-17 www.roadmap-alzheimer.org

Recommend


More recommend