risk for disinfection alternatives
play

Risk for Disinfection Alternatives Analysis May 10, 2013 Donnie - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Department of Homeland Security Regulatory Impacts on Monetizing Risk for Disinfection Alternatives Analysis May 10, 2013 Donnie Stallman Outline Trends and status of chlorine gas disinfection Drivers Safety Regulatory


  1. Department of Homeland Security Regulatory Impacts on Monetizing Risk for Disinfection Alternatives Analysis May 10, 2013 Donnie Stallman

  2. Outline • Trends and status of chlorine gas disinfection • Drivers • Safety • Regulatory • Impacts on chlorine disinfection lifecycle analyses • Example: Joint Water Commission’s Fernhill Water Treatment Plant (JWC WTP) Brown and Caldwell 2

  3. Chlorine Gas Disinfection • New/pending regulations for storage and handling of Cl 2 gas • Fewer manufacturers/suppliers of Cl 2 gas • Response to more stringent regulations • Municipalities reconsidering water/wastewater disinfection options • Cl 2 gas typically the apparent lowest cost chlorine disinfection alternative Brown and Caldwell 3

  4. Drivers and Regulatory Responses • Safety Concerns • Regulatory • Domestic accidents • Prompted by safety concerns • Potential security risks • Numerous governing agencies/bodies for Cl 2 gas • More regulation on the way? Brown and Caldwell 4

  5. Safety Drivers • Events in U.S. (Transportation and Handling) • Graniteville, SC – 2005 • Port of Tacoma, WA – 2007 • Las Vegas, NV – 2007 Brown and Caldwell 5

  6. Safety Drivers • Events in Iraq (Used as a weapon) • 2007 – over ten events where chlorine was used as a weapon. • Targeting trucks that were transporting chlorine gas. Brown and Caldwell 6

  7. Regulations What governing bodies have regulations/guidelines for transport, storage and use of chlorine? • UFC (Uniform Fire Code) and • The 10 States Standards IFC (International Fire Code) • AWWA (American Water Works • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Association) Protection Agency) • OSHA (Occupational Safety • USDOT (U.S. Department of and Health Administration) Transportation) • NIOSH (National Institute of • PHMSA (Pipeline and Occupational Safety and Hazardous Materials Safety Health) Administration) • DHS (Department of • The Chlorine Institute Homeland Security) • NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) Brown and Caldwell 7

  8. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) • Chlorine tank explosion is one of DHS national planning scenarios. • SAFETY (Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies) Act. • Created in 2002 • Incentivizes development/deployment of anti-terrorism technologies • Establishes Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT) Brown and Caldwell 8

  9. Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technology (QATT) • How to promote development/deployment of anti- terrorism technologies? • “Ensure the threat of liability does not deter potential manufacturers…” • Limited liability for claims related to an act of terrorism • Immune to punitive damages • QATT Certifications: • 2003 – 2005: six designated QATTs • Since 2005: approx. 70 more • Klorigen: Certified QATT in 2010. Brown and Caldwell 9

  10. Other Proposed Regulations • Several bills have been proposed addressing storage/use of chlorine that have not been passed into law yet (?) • Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act, 2009 • Drinking Water System Security Act, 2009 • Secure Water Facilities Act, 2010 Brown and Caldwell 10

  11. Chlorine Gas Availability • Industrial production in U.S. exceeds 15 million tons/yr • Fewer than 20 states produce • Large quantities must be transported Brown and Caldwell 11

  12. Chlorine Gas Availability • Pacific Northwest • Jones Chemical, Inc – only Cl 2 gas vendor in WA • Sierra Chemical Co. Northern CA and Southern OR. • Thatcher: MT, ID, and UT • Hypochlorite also relies on transport of Cl 2 gas • Not immune to security regulations on Cl 2 gas transport • More numerous suppliers • Subject to less regulatory pressure Brown and Caldwell 12

  13. Chlorine Gas Transport 90-ton train tanker 1-ton cylinder 150-lb NaOCl cylinders Brown and Caldwell 13

  14. Case Study: Joint Water Commission 14

  15. Joint Water Commission (JWC) • Fernhill Water Treatment Plant (JWC WTP) • Distributes finished water to Hillsboro, Forest Grove, Tualatin Valley Water District, and Beaverton • 75 MGD peak day design capacity • Chlorine Gas Disinfection: Existing JWC WTP Chlorinator Sizing and Description Unit no. Capacity, pounds per day (ppd) Primary application Control 1 1,000 Post sedimentation basin flume Flow paced 2 1,000 Clearwell Flow paced 3 150 FWPB 2 Flow paced 4 150 FWPB 1 Flow paced 5 750 Rapid mix Flow paced Total capacity 3,050 Firm capacity 2,050 15

  16. 16

  17. Alternatives Analysis Alterna nati tive Type/S /Strength trength Chlorine Gas Ton containers Bulk Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite 12% delivered Onsite Generation (low strength) 0.8% Onsite Generation (high strength) 12.5% Brown and Caldwell 17

  18. Level of Service Considerations • operator safety • public safety • ability to meet 2028 design conditions • 70 mgd average, 135 mgd peak • ease of expansion to meet 2047 design conditions • 91 mgd average, 175 mgd peak • maintenance and energy costs • risk of supply chain interruptions Brown and Caldwell 18

  19. Lifecycle Cost Analysis • 20 year analysis • Components: • Capital, O&M, R&R, risk • Assumptions: • Greenfield construction • Intermediate ozonation per master plan • Existing Cl 2 gas scrubber could be used • Caustic savings included for hypochlorite alternatives Brown and Caldwell 19

  20. Lifecycle Cost Analysis Major Cost Estimation Components Bulk Liquid Sodium Chlorine Gas Onsite Hypo Generation (0.8%) Onsite Hypo Generation (12.5%) Hypochlorite Capital • Chlorinators • Storage tanks • Onsite generation equipment • Onsite generation equipment • New building • Metering and transfer pumps • New building • New building • New building • Storage tanks • Storage tanks • Metering and transfer pumps • Metering and transfer pumps O&M • Delivery of ton • Delivery of liquid hypo • Salt • Salt containers • Caustic • Power for electrolyzers • Power for electrolyzers • Caustic • General maintenance • Caustic • Caustic • General maintenance • General maintenance • General maintenance Assumptions • $465/Cl 2 gas ton • $0.79/gallon delivered liquid • $0.033/lb of salt • $0.033/lb of salt container sodium hypochlorite • $414/ton of caustic • $414/ton of caustic • $414/ton of caustic • $414/ton of caustic • 28 percent reduction in caustic • 28 percent reduction in • Existing Cl 2 scrubber • 28 percent reduction in caustic per RTW modeling caustic per RTW modeling can be used per RTW modeling • $0.10/kilowatt hour (kWh) • $0.10/kWh Brown and Caldwell 20

  21. Monetizing Risk • Supply chain interruption • No access to Cl 2 gas deliveries for 1 week each year • Liquid hypochlorite delivered at an inflated rate as emergency measure • Truck rental/demurrage and metering pump rental costs Cost st Item Annual al Risk Cost ($/yr yr) Inflated Bulk Liquid Hypochlorite $56,000 Truck Rental/Demurrage $21,000 Metering Pumps $5,000 Tot otal al $82,000 00 Brown and Caldwell 21

  22. Net Present Value Results Chlorine Disinfection Alternatives Net Present Value Capital cost, O&M cost, R&R cost, Risk cost, Alternative Description NPV present value present value present value present value 1 Chlorine Gas $2.77 million $11.6 million $265,000 $1.56 million $16.2 million Bulk Liquid Sodium 2 $2.31 million $12.1 million $336,000 - $14.8 million Hypochlorite (12%) 3 Onsite Hypo Generation (0.8%) $7.32 million $9.76 million $1.48 million - $18.6 million 4 Onsite Hypo Generation (12.5%) $9.86 million $11.8 million $1.84 million - $23.5 million Chlorine Disinfection Alternatives Net Present Value Capital cost, O&M cost, R&R cost, Risk cost, Alternative Description NPV present value present value present value present value 1 Chlorine Gas $2.77 million $11.6 million $265,000 - $14.6 million Bulk Liquid Sodium 2 $2.31 million $12.1 million $336,000 - $14.8 million Hypochlorite (12%) 3 Onsite Hypo Generation (0.8%) $7.32 million $9.76 million $1.48 million - $18.6 million 4 Onsite Hypo Generation (12.5%) $9.86 million $11.8 million $1.84 million - $23.5 million Brown and Caldwell 22

  23. Conclusions • Safety and regulatory drivers are motivating municipalities to reconsider disinfection options. • Establishment of QATTs by DHS telling example of how regulating bodies are looking at chlorine gas. • There are significant risk costs to be considered when evaluating chlorine gas as a disinfection alternative. • Delivered liquid sodium hypochlorite was determined to be the lowest long-term cost solution for the JWC WTP. Brown and Caldwell 23

  24. Questions?

Recommend


More recommend