revisiting soliton contributions to perturbative processes
play

Revisiting soliton contributions to perturbative processes Andy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revisiting soliton contributions to perturbative processes Andy Royston Texas A&M University Strings, Princeton, June 26, 2014 Based on 1403.5017 and 1404.0016 with C. Papageorgakis Gong Show, Round 16 Even the Fight of the Century


  1. Revisiting soliton contributions to perturbative processes Andy Royston Texas A&M University Strings, Princeton, June 26, 2014 Based on 1403.5017 and 1404.0016 with C. Papageorgakis

  2. Gong Show, Round 16 Even the “Fight of the Century” went only 15 rounds

  3. Q & A Q: Do solitons run in loops? A: Yes, in the following sense: � � � � 2 f � d � f � � 2 Im f � � k � k k Q: • Can we compute their contribution to perturbative processes? • Is this contribution “exponentially suppressed”? (in what quantity?) 1 A: • Yes, under certain assumptions. • Usually, but not necessarily. (in the ratio R c / R S .) 1 Drukier and Nussinov (1982)..., Demidov and Levkov (2011), Banks (2012)

  4. How do we compute? Use analyticity and crossing symmetry: S S S p 1 p 2 p 2 cross k t p 1 ' S k � A pair-prod ( k 2 ) A scat ( k 2 ) � = � � p ′ 1 = − p 1 compute A scat perturbatively in soliton sector: dtH I }| k , S ( p ′ 1 − p 2 ) A scat ( k 2 ) = � S ( p 2 ) | T { e − i � δ ( k + p ′ 1 ) �

  5. Exhibiting suppression � � x − x 0 • consider class of scalar models φ ( x ) = φ S R S ; . . .

  6. Exhibiting suppression � � x − x 0 • consider class of scalar models φ ( x ) = φ S R S ; . . . • find A pair − prod ( k 2 ) vanishes faster than any power in the ratio R c / R S for k 2 above † threshold (2 M S ) 2 † need to understand threshold effects better

  7. Exhibiting suppression � � x − x 0 • consider class of scalar models φ ( x ) = φ S R S ; . . . • find A pair − prod ( k 2 ) “exponentially suppressed” in the ratio R c / R S for k 2 above † threshold (2 M S ) 2 A pair − prod ( k 2 ) � e − 2 R S / R c . . . † need to understand threshold effects better

  8. Exhibiting suppression � � x − x 0 • consider class of scalar models φ ( x ) = φ S R S ; . . . • find A pair − prod ( k 2 ) “exponentially suppressed” in the ratio R c / R S for k 2 above † threshold (2 M S ) 2 A pair − prod ( k 2 ) � e − 2 R S / R c . . . • provided R S bounded away from zero (as a function on the moduli space of soliton solutions) † need to understand threshold effects better

  9. Possible lessons for 5D MSYM • first take off the EFT glasses and suppose that 5D MSYM is a microscopic theory • ⇒ integrate over all loop momenta ( i.e. Λ UV → ∞ ) • but then, for k 2 > (2 M S ) 2 , will produce S - S pairs • R S = ρ → 0 so argument for exponential suppression breaks down, suggesting soliton contributions may compete • unfortunately approx. scheme also breaks down...need new methods

  10. Possible lessons for 5D MSYM • first take off the EFT glasses and suppose that 5D MSYM is a microscopic theory • ⇒ integrate over all loop momenta ( i.e. Λ UV → ∞ ) • but then, for k 2 > (2 M S ) 2 , will produce S - S pairs • R S = ρ → 0 so argument for exponential suppression breaks down, suggesting soliton contributions may compete • unfortunately approx. scheme also breaks down...need new methods Thank you!

  11. example with internal modulus 3 1 1 ( ∂µφ∂µφ + ∂µχ∂µχ ) − ( W 2 φ + W 2 L = χ ) 2 2 1 β χ 3 − χφ 2 − φ 3 W = χ − 3 3 � � � β 2 + 4 − β 2 + 4 + β b )2 + 4( b 2 − 1) βχ + b ( χ ⇒ φ ( χ ) = , 2  �  � � � b 2 − 1 b 2 − 1( β 2 + 4 − β ) � 2 tanh( x − x 0) + 2 b β b � χ ( x ) = − −   β 2 + 4  � � �  b 2 − 1( β 2 + 4 − β ) 2 tanh( x − x 0) + 2 b b 2 − 1 Χ Φ 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 x � x 0 0.4 � 10 � 8 � 6 � 4 � 2 2 4 0.2 � 0.5 x � x 0 � 1.0 � 10 � 8 � 6 � 4 � 2 2 4 3 BNRT (1997); Brito and de Souza Dutra (2014)

Recommend


More recommend