revision of drgs regarding multiple significant trauma
play

Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, 486, 486O and 487) MDC 21 Nils Oddvar Skaga, MD PhD Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry Oslo University Hospital, Ullevl Oslo - Norway Objectives Oslo University


  1. Revision of DRGs regarding Multiple significant trauma (484, 485, 486, 486O and 487) – MDC 21 Nils Oddvar Skaga, MD PhD Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål Oslo - Norway

  2. Objectives • Oslo University Hospital (OUH) trauma service – brief introduction • The trauma registry at OUH (TR-OUH) • Scoring of anatomic injury in trauma • What is the DRG-problem in trauma? • Our suggestions nosk_2015 2

  3. OUH Trauma Service • Major trauma centre, Oslo (600,000) • Trauma referral centre, health regions East and South of Norway (2.7 million) • 1,800 trauma admissions each year • Severe injury (ISS >15) 600 patients/yr (40%) ISS = Injury Severity Score nosk_2015 3

  4. Trauma service activity Trauma team activations 2000 - 2014 OUH-TR, Ullevål 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 nosk_2015 4

  5. Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry • Operative since August 2000 • Nearly 17.000 patients included • Document trauma service activity and quality • Research • DRG revision – potential financial gain for the hospital nosk_2015 5

  6. What is the DRG-problem in trauma? nosk_2015 6

  7. Formal request MDC21

  8. Formal request for MDC21 • principal diagnosis from the group Fresh trauma or fresh trauma related diagnosis (principal diagnosis property 00P21) (1011 diagnoses) • two or more diagnoses indicating significant trauma in more than one body region (24X10 – 24X81) OR • a diagnosis indicating injuries in multiple areas of the body (diagnosis property 24X90)

  9. Present DRG • a good description of the field • necessary to do a revision of the diagnosis properties – in order to make the system more consistent and more logical • “Significant injury” • “Not significant injury” nosk_2015 9

  10. International classification of traumatic injury 1350 codes Severity score 1 to 6: • AIS code 1 Minor • AIS code 2 Moderate • AIS code 3 Serious • AIS code 4 Severe • AIS code 5 Critical • AIS code 6 Maximum nosk_2015 10

  11. Suggestion Focus on 5 categories 1) Columna injuries 2) Large blood vessels 3) Open wounds 4) Nerve damage in arms and legs 5) Other diagnosis nosk_2015 11

  12. Suggestions • Marked “IN” – should be reclassified as significant • Marked “OUT” – should be reclassified as not significant nosk_2015 12

  13. Columna nosk_2015 13

  14. Inconsistency? • Diagnosis included (significant) today: • Must be included: nosk_2015 14

  15. Injuries on large blood vessels nosk_2015 15

  16. Open wounds nosk_2015 16

  17. Nerve damage in arms and legs nosk_2015 17

  18. Other injuries nosk_2015 18

  19. Other injuries, continued nosk_2015 19

  20. Severe Injury TR-OUS 2009 – 2013 DRG-groups Injury Severity Score > 15 • 483 476 patients (17,0%) • 484 116 patients (4.1%) • 485 13 patients (0.5%) • 486 454 patients (16.2%) • 487 279 patients (10.0%) Number of patients with ISS > 15: 2803 Number of patients in actual DRG groups: 1338 (47,7%)

  21. Severe injury – international convention • Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 – Range 1 (small) to 75 (lethal) • ISS = AIS 2 + AIS 2 + AIS 2 • ISS = 4 2 + 3 2 + 3 2 = 34 nosk_2015 21

  22. Conclusion • A trauma rigistry is a unique tool for quality assurance • The present DRG groups give a good description of the field • demanding to do a revision of the diagnosis properties – to make the system more consistent and more logical nosk_2015 22

Recommend


More recommend