renewal application training for part i
play

Renewal Application Training for Part I FY2019 Continuum of Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Renewal Application Training for Part I FY2019 Continuum of Care Competition June 13, 2019 Agenda 1. Debrief from FY2018 Competition 2. New System Structure Overview: Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness 3. Point in Time Count


  1. Renewal Application Training for Part I FY2019 Continuum of Care Competition June 13, 2019

  2. Agenda 1. Debrief from FY2018 Competition 2. New System Structure Overview: Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness 3. Point in Time Count & System Performance Measures Review 4. Local Scoring Guidelines 5. Renewal Application Content 6. ZoomGrants Training 7. eSNAPS Overview 8. Questions 9. Timeline Reminder 10. Contact Information

  3. FY2018 Continuum of Care Program Competition UT-500 Collaborative Application Score CoC Scoring Summary, 2018 Overall Scores for all CoCs, 2018 Maximum Score Your CoC • Highest Score for any CoC: Scoring Category (Points) Score (Points) Part 1: CoC Structure and Governance 52 47.25 190 • Lowest Score for any CoC: Part 2: Data Collection and Quality 49 38 47.75 Part 3: CoC Performance and Strategic Planning 77 69.75 • Median Score for all CoCs: Part 4: Cross-Cutting Policies 22 22 160 • Weighted Mean Score for all CoCs: Total CoC Application Score 200 177 166.75 Overall Scores for all CoCs, 2017 CoC Scoring Summary, 2017 Maximum Score Your CoC • Highest Score for any CoC: Scoring Category (Points) Score (Points) 190.75 Part 1: CoC Structure and Governance 50 44 • Lowest Score for any CoC: Part 2: Data Collection and Quality 46 31 57 • Median Score for all CoCs: Part 3: CoC Performance and Strategic Planning 82 68 147.5 Part 4: Cross-Cutting Policies 22 11 • Weighted Mean Score for all CoCs: 3 159.75 Total CoC Application Score 200 154

  4. UT-500 Historical Scoring Overview CoC Scores post-HEARTH Act 100.00% 95.47% 95.00% 93.00% 89.62% 89.36% 88.66% 90.00% 88.00% 85.00% 82.76% 80.73% 81.41% 79.47% 80.00% 77.00% 75.52% 75.00% 70.00% 2012 2013-2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Compared to Total Points Possible Compared to High Score

  5. Statewide CoC Funding FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 Competition Competition Competition Competition Salt Lake County $7.4 million $7.3 million* $7.4 million $7.8 million CoC Balance of State $1.6 million $1.8 million* $1.8 million $1.8 million CoC Mountainlands $1 million 0.9 million $1 million $1.2 million CoC Combined Total $10 million $10.1 million $10.2 million $10.9 million * Tooele County became part of the Balance of State CoC and included the transfer of $210,000 in ARD funding

  6. SALT LAKE VALLEY COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS Assisted Living First Responders Terminally Aging Housing Ill/ Location Medically Medical Domestic Frail Respite Violence Permanent Criminal Families Technical & Supportive Dental Outreach Justice Vocational Care Communica Services Training tions Tiny Client Veterans Lived Public *Substanc Intake /Shared Experience Safety e Use Early LGBTQ Disorder Childhood Faiths Diversion Housing Funding/ Transitional *Criminal Non-HMIS First Client ESG, Etc. Justice Data Employee Physical City Food Groups Advisory Coordinat Higher Ed Education Health Governme Rapid Re- Security *Ranking Committee *PIT ed Entry / Training nts housing *Youth Count Resource Mental Legal *Applicati Trauma Centers/ Public & *Communi Health Human Defenders K-12 on Task Informed Affordable *HMIS Shelter Private ty Councils Task Group Trafficking Association Group Care Data HUD/ Community Legal Health/Wellness Best Housing Core Education Core Employment Client Focused Action/ Crisis Response Funding Engagement Rights/Safety Practices Function Core Function Core Function Core Function Function Research Core Function Activities Core Function Core Function Support Agencies Steering Committee 16 voting members , 4-6 advisory members Policy & Funding Decision *Existing group Makers: Government, STH Board, Private Funders

  7. 2019 PIT Count Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Steering Committee Meeting – June 12, 2019

  8. The homeless count increased 2%, driven by a more accurate count of unsheltered individuals Count of homeless individuals 2,500 2,176 2,047 1,891 Total individuals 1,844 2,000 1,804 2,086 1,886 1,834 Sheltered 1,500 1,668 1,651 individuals 1,000 500 Unsheltered 193 161 136 90 57 individuals - 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  9. The count of individuals in households with children decreased for the second straight year Count of homeless individuals 1,500 1,341 1,346 1,315 in households 1,260 without children 1,182 1,000 830 699 631 620 526 in households with children 500 in households 7 0 0 2 3 - of only children 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  10. Due to the improved accuracy of the count and more local resources available to homeless youth, the count of unaccompanied youth under 24 increased Count of homeless youth under 24 Unaccompanied 144 150 youth under 24 112 110 100 77 72 50 Children of 33 30 28 parenting youth 26 18 under 24 28 24 22 Parenting youth 14 13 - under 24 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  11. The count of homeless veterans decreased 16% from 2018 and is down 45% since 2015 Count of homeless veterans 288 300 275 187 200 177 157 Veterans 100 - 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  12. The chronically homeless count is nearly unchanged from 2018 to 2019 Count of chronically homeless individuals Count with 382 383 400 new method 300 227 Count with old method 182 200 164 143 100 - 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  13. 2019 System Performance Measures Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Steering Committee Meeting – June 12, 2019

  14. There was an increase in sheltered persons of 5% between FFY17 and FFY18. Reported by an annual HMIS sheltered count (SPM) and a single night sheltered and unsheltered count (PIT). 9,000 SPM: Sheltered homeless 9,534 9,332 9,081 persons. Federal Fiscal Year 8,624 (FFY), October 1 to September 7,000 30. 5,000 PIT: Sheltered 3,000 2,176 2,047 1,891 1,844 1,804 and unsheltered persons on a 1,000 single night in January. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 SPM: Federal Fiscal Year/PIT: Year of January Count

  15. The Average Length Of Time Homeless decreased by 10%. Average Length Of Time Homeless. 100 94 90 Persons in Emergency Shelter and 77 80 74 Transitional 70 Housing. 70 67 Persons in 66 60 Emergency 61 60 Shelter 50 FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 FFY 2018 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  16. Total Returns to Homelessness remained constant. Returns to Homelessness as a percentage. 50% 42% 42% 41% Total returns 39% 40% in 2 years. 30% Less than 6 25% 23% 22% months 20% 20% 11% 10% 10% 9% 6 to 12 months 10% 9% 13 to 24 months 8% 8% 8% 0% FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 FFY 2018 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  17. The number of people exited to a Permanent Housing destination increased by 3% Percent of exits from Emergency Shelter, Transitional Housing and Rapid Rehousing projects to Permanent Housing. 50% 41% 40% 31% 29% 28% 38% State of 30% Utah 20% 23% Salt Lake 20% County CoC 17% 10% 0% FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 FFY 2018 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  18. People in Permanent Housing projects are either exiting to Permanent Housing or Retaining their housing status at steady levels. Percent of Permanent Housing exits to Permanent Housing destinations, or retention of Permanent Housing. 100% 95% 94% 94% 94% Salt Lake 93% County CoC 92% 92% State of 92% 90% Utah 89% 85% FFY 2015 FFY 2016 FFY 2017 FFY 2018 Data questions? hmis@utah.gov

  19. Scoring Guidelines • Part of ZoomGrants Reference CATEGORY & WEIGHT Project Effectiveness Budget Library Data Quality Performance & Need – And posted to County website Data Quality 10% – http://slco.org/homeless- Budget 10% services/fy2019-coc-competition/ • Project Effectiveness, Budget, Data Quality (50%) Performance & Need Project 50% Effectiveness – Scored by Ranking Committee 30% • Performance & Need (50%) – Scored by SLCO

  20. • Alignment with USICH Federal Strategic Plan – Ensure homelessness is rare, brief and a one-time experience • Alignment with State Strategic Plan • Connect System Level reporting to program level performance and evaluation Graphic Source: State of Utah Annual Report on Homelessness 2018

  21. Changes from 2018 Scoring • Program Best Practices – Question added: Agency clearly defines and gives clear examples of how the project funding supports making episodes of homelessness rare, brief and one-time • Integrated Network: Partnerships – Question added about participation in Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness • Budget – Removed question related to % of HUD budget used for housing (rent, leasing, operations) • Need & Performance – Decreased weight of income related elements • Stayers and leavers considered separately – Increased weight of exits to Permanent Housing/retention of Permanent Housing

  22. Estimated Funding Available • $7,673,145 – CoC’s Annual Renewal Demand • Fund renewals and any new projects created through reallocation • $71,328 available for Reallocation • Bonus Funding: Unknown until NOFA release – 2018 Amounts • DV Bonus: $493,127 • Bonus Projects: $428,764

Recommend


More recommend