rehabilitation following scr and rtsa
play

REHABILITATION FOLLOWING SCR AND RTSA 2017 Ortho Summit December 9, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

REHABILITATION FOLLOWING SCR AND RTSA 2017 Ortho Summit December 9, 2017 Ellen Shanley PhD, PT, OCS I (and/or my co-authors) have nothing to disclose. Detailed disclosure information is available through the Orthopedic Summit The Paradigm


  1. REHABILITATION FOLLOWING SCR AND RTSA 2017 Ortho Summit December 9, 2017 Ellen Shanley PhD, PT, OCS

  2. I (and/or my co-authors) have nothing to disclose. Detailed disclosure information is available through the Orthopedic Summit

  3. The Paradigm PROCEDURE PROBLEM TREATMENT IMPAIRMENT GOALS PATHOLOGY

  4. rTSA compared to SCR

  5. Influence on Choice & Progression Cuff Deficient ⇣ Function Shoulder Pseudo Pain Paralysis

  6. Our Responsibility… Managing Expectations Appropriate For Each Patient

  7. Implications for Rehabilitation Young ⇡ Age GOALS IMPAIRMENT Function vs Pain PATHOLOGY Massive RCT

  8. Intra operative findings- rTSA  Type of implant/component  Humeral bone quality,  Deltoid status  Integrity of remaining RC,  Concomitant RC repair  Overall component stability.

  9. Common complications RTSA  Scapular notching  Component Failure/ disassociation  Dislocation  Infection  Acromial Stress fracture

  10. Key Concepts- rTSA  3 Key Rehab Concepts: 1. Joint protection 2. Deltoid function a. Remainder of RTC 3. Est appropriate functional goals a. ROM

  11. Priorities AROM & ant ROM- 90º FE; Adv strength deltoid Strength 20º-ER Limit cycles No body wgt Submax Iso’s protect stability Limit cycles of & Limit stress Scapular Ex ROM Hold vs. cycles….

  12. rTSA  rTSA higher risk for dislocation vs. conventional TSA (Boudreau et al., 2007)  Dislocation typically occurs in IR, adduction and extension (reaching behind back)

  13. Early expectations 3-4 weeks….

  14. DC Outcomes

  15. Implications for Rehabilitation Young ⇡ Age GOALS IMPAIRMENT Function vs Pain PATHOLOGY Massive RCT

  16. SCR Implications for Rehab  Allograft  Best tissue @ day 1 post-op  “soft tissue rTSA ” (Thay Lee, PhD)  Augmented massive RCR  Rotational stress  Tenodesis effect of subscapularis & infraspinatus  Long axis stress  Gravity  ”distraction” (Mihata et al AJSM ’16)

  17. Intra-operative Findings- Expectations  Restoration of PROM  Amt Subscap/ Infra  Remaining Tissue  Mobilization  Position  AROM- Amount of native tissue

  18. SCR Treatment Pathway  Massive RCR Pathway  Failure of Massive RCR- 98% in 1 st 6 months  Repairs of tears > 4cm fail < 12 wks ( Miller et al AJSM ‘11) ☐ Increased risk of “re-tear/non healing” with early AROM ☐ < 3cm early 1.63x ☐ > 3m early 2.5x ☐ > 5cm 6x

  19. Priorities Education Protect Joint 5 weeks- healing tissue Protection distal UE & Protection ROM only Care Functional Box ER then FE- Mobility ROM ADL’s

  20. Protected ROM Rehabilitation plan to match the surgery and the patient Graft type • Other cuff status • Patient goals/context •

  21. Goals • Work • Sport Loading • Position • Reps Demands

  22. Controlled Loading for Function >50% 40-60% 25-50% • All suggested exercises < 40% rotator cuff EMG

  23. Great < 90 then Fight Gravity Restore Force Couple

  24. Patient Outcome Expectation n=9 n=8

  25. AROM Return After SCR

  26. The real story on AROM return n= 22 n=12

  27. Return to Function ➔ No heavy lifting 4-6 months ➔ Sport progressions o Golf > 20 weeks o Tennis >26 weeks o Swimming >26 weeks (Fealy S et al. ’02; McKee MD et al. 00; Ellman et al ‘86; Charousset et al ‘08)

  28. Healing Time to Function

Recommend


More recommend